Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose the relationship between income and consumption is such that higher incomes are associated with higher consumption of a similar amount. How can the relationship be represented on a graph ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Graph the relationship as a straight line with income on the x-axis and consumption on the y-axis, showing a positive slope.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Relationship

Begin by recognizing that the relationship between income and consumption is direct and positive. This means that as income increases, consumption also increases in a linear manner.
02

Choosing Axes for the Graph

To graph this relationship, plot 'Income' on the horizontal (x) axis and 'Consumption' on the vertical (y) axis. This standard layout will help in visualizing how changes in income affect consumption.
03

Plotting Points on the Graph

For a clearer representation, choose several income levels and their corresponding consumption amounts. Because the relationship is linear and direct, for each increase in income, plot a proportionate increase in consumption on the graph.
04

Drawing the Line

Use the plotted points to draw a line. Since the relationship is linear, this line will be straight and will slope upwards from left to right, illustrating that with every unit increase in income, there is a proportional increase in consumption.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Direct Relationship between Income and Consumption
In economics, a direct relationship between two variables means that they move together in the same direction. The relationship between income and consumption is an excellent example of this. When income rises, consumption typically rises too, indicating a positive and direct connection. This means that as people earn more money, they tend to spend more as well.

This is fundamentally due to increased purchasing power. People are more likely to buy goods and services as their income increases. The direct relationship suggests that the rate of spending is constant in relation to income.

This connection is crucial for understanding consumer behavior and for economic policy-making. Policymakers and businesses study this relationship to predict changes in economic cycles and to make informed decisions about marketing and production strategies.
Understanding a Linear Graph
A linear graph is a type of graph that represents a relationship between two variables with a straight line. This happens when the relationship between the variables is proportional.

In the context of income and consumption, the linear graph will show a diagonal line. As you move along the line, an increase on the x-axis (income) results in a corresponding increase on the y-axis (consumption). This consistent pattern is what makes the graph linear.
  • The straight line is an indication that the relationship between income and consumption is constant and predictable.
  • The slope of the line indicates the rate of change. A steeper slope means a higher rate of consumption increase per unit of income.
Understanding linear graphs is essential for visualizing data trends and making economic predictions.
Axes Selection for Graphing Economic Relationships
When graphing relationships like income and consumption, choosing the correct axes is critical. Typically, in economics, we place the independent variable on the x-axis and the dependent variable on the y-axis.

In this case, income is the independent variable because it's assumed to cause changes in consumption, which is the dependent variable. Therefore, income is plotted on the horizontal (x) axis while consumption is plotted on the vertical (y) axis.

This standard form allows for a clear understanding of how changes in income levels lead to changes in consumption. When setting up your graph:
  • Ensure both axes have clear labels and include appropriate units of measurement.
  • Use a consistent scale to maintain the accuracy and readability of the graph.
This arrangement helps economists and students alike to visually interpret data and comprehend economic concepts more effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table below shows unemployment rates in the capital (London) and the rest of the country. One-third of the national population lives in the capital. Construct an index of national unemployment, treating 2000 as 100 . What weights did you use for the two unemployment rates? Why? $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Unemployment } \\ \text { (\%) } \end{array} & 1997 & 1998 & 1999 & 2000 & 2001 & 2002 & 2003 \\ \hline \text { London } & 7 & 6 & 5 & 4 & 6 & 5 & 4 \\ \hline \text { Rest of country } & 10 & 9 & 8 & 8 & 9 & 8 & 8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

When we use economic data to test an economic theory, we must choose how high to set the bar in our test. If we say that whenever the data depart at all from the prediction of the theory, we will reject most of our theories, which were only approximations in the first place. Conversely, if we only reject a theory when the data are a long way away from the prediction of the theory, we will hardly ever reject any theory. Which of these two possible mistakes is more dangerous ?

Following the introduction of a congestion charge for driving into Central London, traffic levels initially fell by 20 per cent. Over the next few years, traffic reverted almost to its original level. Does this show that the congestion charge failed to reduce congestion ? Even if it did, might it still be a good idea ?

Why are these statements wrong ? (a) The purpose of a theory is to let you ignore the facts. (b) Economics cannot be a science since it cannot conduct controlled laboratory experiments. (c) People have feelings and act haphazardly. It is misguided to reduce their actions to scientific laws.

Suppose the relationship between the price of a car and its quantity demanded, other things equal, is graphed as a downward-sloping straight line. Suppose the income of consumers increases and the demand for cars increases. What happens to the downward-sloping straight line when demand for cars increases owing to an increase in consumers' income ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free