Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The police research department wants to study whether the level of crime is affected by the unemployment rate. (a) How would you test this idea ? What data would you want ? (b) What 'other things equal' problems would you bear in mind \(?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Conduct a correlational study using historical crime and unemployment data, controlling for confounding factors to test the relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Hypothesis

The hypothesis here is that the level of crime may be influenced by the unemployment rate. In other words, there is a suspected causal relationship between unemployment and crime levels.
02

Determine the Type of Study

To test the hypothesis, you would conduct a correlational study to examine the relationship between unemployment rates and crime levels. A regression analysis could be useful to quantify the relationship between these variables.
03

Identify the Data Required

You would need historical data on both unemployment rates and crime levels. This data should be collected over the same time period and from the same regions to ensure that the data sets are comparable.
04

Consider Other Factors ("Other Things Equal")

While analyzing, consider other variables that might affect crime rates, such as economic conditions, changes in law enforcement practices, population density, and socioeconomic factors. These factors, if uncontrolled, could confound the relationship between unemployment and crime.
05

Mitigate Confounding Variables

Use statistical techniques, such as multiple regression analysis, to control for these other variables, isolating the effect of unemployment on crime. Ensure that data is collected consistently and variables are operationally defined.
06

Formulate Conclusions

After conducting the analysis, you'd assess whether there is a statistically significant relationship between unemployment rates and crime levels. Conclusions should be drawn carefully, acknowledging any limitations or assumptions made.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlational Study
A correlational study is an essential tool for understanding the relationship between two variables. In this case, crime rates and unemployment levels are the focus. The primary goal is to determine if there is a systematic association between these variables. By examining past data on crime and unemployment, researchers can identify patterns or trends.

Correlational studies do not imply causation. This means that even if two variables move together, one does not necessarily cause the other. For instance, while high unemployment may accompany higher crime rates, it doesn’t mean unemployment directly causes crime. Instead, there might be other underlying factors influencing both these variables.

To conduct a correlational study, researchers would
  • Collect data on crime rates and unemployment levels over the same periods and locations.
  • Use statistical methods to measure the strength of the association, typically using a correlation coefficient.
  • Interpret the results, keeping in mind that correlation does not equal causation.
Such studies provide valuable insights but should be complemented by further analysis to draw definitive conclusions.
Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is a powerful statistical method used to understand relationships between dependent and independent variables. In our scenario, the crime rate is considered the dependent variable, while unemployment is an independent variable.

By employing regression analysis, researchers can:
  • Quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between unemployment and crime.
  • Make predictions about crime rates based on unemployment levels.
  • Control for other factors and identify how they affect the primary variables of interest.
In this process, data is fitted to a model, often a line in simple linear regression. The equation of this line helps in predicting the dependent variable. For example, if you have a regression equation like \( y = mx + c \), then \( y \) would represent predicted crime levels, \( x \) the unemployment rate, \( m \) the slope, and \( c \) the y-intercept.

Effective regression analysis accounts for variances and provides a clearer picture of complex relationships that may not be immediately apparent.
Confounding Variables
Confounding variables are those other factors that could potentially influence the results of a study, besides the variables being directly examined. In this scenario, while studying the relationship between unemployment and crime, other elements like economic changes, law enforcement policies, or population density could skew the results.

These variables can create false impressions of relationships or mask true relationships.

To manage these confounders, researchers should:
  • Identify possible confounding variables beforehand through literature review or expert consultation.
  • Use statistical techniques, like multiple regression, to control for these confounders during analysis.
  • Carefully design the study to minimize the impact of these variables, such as using matched samples.
Recognizing and adjusting for confounding variables is vital to ensure that the conclusions drawn from the study are accurate and reliable. In doing so, the integrity of the research is preserved, providing better insights into the true nature of the relationship between unemployment and crime.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table below shows car prices and house prices for the years 2011 and 2012 . Calculate the absolute change and the percentage change in the prices of cars and houses between the years 2011 and 2012 . $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|} \hline & 2011 & 2012 \\ \hline \text { Car prices ( } £) & 10000 & 9600 \\ \hline \text { House prices }(£) & £ 200000 & £ 192000 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Suppose the relationship between the price of a car and its quantity demanded, other things equal, is graphed as a downward-sloping straight line. Suppose the income of consumers increases and the demand for cars increases. What happens to the downward-sloping straight line when demand for cars increases owing to an increase in consumers' income ?

The table below shows unemployment rates in the capital (London) and the rest of the country. One-third of the national population lives in the capital. Construct an index of national unemployment, treating 2000 as 100 . What weights did you use for the two unemployment rates? Why? $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Unemployment } \\ \text { (\%) } \end{array} & 1997 & 1998 & 1999 & 2000 & 2001 & 2002 & 2003 \\ \hline \text { London } & 7 & 6 & 5 & 4 & 6 & 5 & 4 \\ \hline \text { Rest of country } & 10 & 9 & 8 & 8 & 9 & 8 & 8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Following the introduction of a congestion charge for driving into Central London, traffic levels initially fell by 20 per cent. Over the next few years, traffic reverted almost to its original level. Does this show that the congestion charge failed to reduce congestion ? Even if it did, might it still be a good idea ?

When we use economic data to test an economic theory, we must choose how high to set the bar in our test. If we say that whenever the data depart at all from the prediction of the theory, we will reject most of our theories, which were only approximations in the first place. Conversely, if we only reject a theory when the data are a long way away from the prediction of the theory, we will hardly ever reject any theory. Which of these two possible mistakes is more dangerous ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free