Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Classify the following taxes as progressive or regressive: (a) a higher tax on luxury goods than on necessities, (b) taxes in proportion to the value of owneroccupied houses, (c) a tax on beer, (d) a tax on champagne.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Progressive, (b) Slightly suggests progressive, (c) Regressive, (d) Progressive.

Step by step solution

01

Define Progressive and Regressive Taxes

A progressive tax imposes a higher percentage rate on higher income earners, usually aiming to reduce inequality by taxing richer individuals more heavily. A regressive tax, on the other hand, takes a larger percentage of income from low earners than from high earners, often impacting the less wealthy disproportionately.
02

Analyze Higher Tax on Luxury Goods than on Necessities

Luxury goods are typically non-essential and bought by those with more disposable income. A higher tax on luxury goods compared to necessities is a progressive tax because it targets higher earners who are more likely to purchase luxury items.
03

Analyze Taxes in Proportion to the Value of Owneroccupied Houses

A tax that is based on the value of owner-occupied houses is usually proportional. However, in practice, since wealthier individuals typically own higher-valued homes, this tax slightly resembles a progressive system, but not strongly enough to call it distinctly progressive without more context.
04

Analyze Tax on Beer

A tax on beer is generally considered regressive because it imposes a flat rate that affects lower-income consumers more severely in terms of their overall income proportion than higher-income consumers.
05

Analyze Tax on Champagne

Similar to the luxury goods tax, a tax on champagne is typically progressive. Champagne is considered a luxury good, usually consumed by wealthier individuals, so the tax targets those who can presumably afford it.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Progressive Tax
A progressive tax is structured to impose a larger tax burden on individuals with higher incomes. The idea is to address economic inequality by redistributing wealth. Think of it as a way to balance the scales, asking those who earn more to contribute more to society's overall budget. For instance, income taxes in many countries are progressive by design. As you earn more, not only does the amount you pay increase, but the rate at which you pay also goes up.

The justification for this system is rooted in fairness. People with more financial resources can handle higher tax rates without compromising their standard of living. These funds are then used to provide public services and benefits which ideally benefit everyone, particularly lower-income groups.
Regressive Tax
Conversely, a regressive tax is one where the tax rate decreases as the income of the taxpayer increases. This means that low-income earners pay a higher percentage of their income compared to high-income earners. Sales taxes are commonly regressive because everyone, regardless of income, pays the same rate when purchasing goods.

This can create a greater financial strain on those with less income, as a larger portion of what they have goes to taxes. Imagine you have two people buying the same item, but one earns significantly less. The impact of that tax is heavier on the person with the lower income.
Does it sound fair? That's why regressive taxes often face criticism for exacerbating economic inequality.
Luxury Goods Taxation
Luxury goods taxation involves imposing higher taxes on goods that are deemed non-essential and often expensive. Items such as high-end cars, designer clothing, and champagne fall into this category. These goods are typically consumed by individuals with higher disposable incomes.

Such taxes are progressive in nature because they mainly affect individuals who can afford to spend more lavishly. By taxing luxury items more heavily, governments aim to extract revenue from those most capable of paying, while sparing those who only purchase necessities.
This kind of taxation reflects a belief that those who spend more on luxury items should contribute more significantly to the public coffers.
Economic Inequality
Economic inequality refers to the extent of the wealth gap between the rich and the poor in a society. The means through which wealth and resources are distributed can greatly influence this gap.

Taxes play a pivotal role in either mitigating or exacerbating economic inequality. Progressive taxation is often seen as a tool to reduce inequality by ensuring that wealthier individuals pay a fairer share. On the other hand, regressive taxes could potentially widen the gap as they take a larger bite from lower incomes.
Governments strive to balance these effects through careful tax policy design, ensuring that the tax system supports social equity. The goal is to create a societal structure where resources are more evenly shared, improving access to opportunities for all.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following are public goods: (a) the fire brigade, (b) clean streets, (c) refuse collection, (d) cable television, (e) social tolerance, \((\mathrm{f})\) the postal service?

Common fallacies Why are these statements wrong? (a) If the government spends all its revenue, taxes are not a burden on society as a whole. (b) Taxes always distort markets. (c) Political economy is just an excuse to waffle, and cannot be made rigorous.

How would you apply the principles of horizontal and vertical equity in deciding how much to tax two people, each capable of doing the same work, but one of whom chooses to devote more time to sunbathing and therefore has a lower income?

A firm that produces steel is polluting the air. Assume that the marginal cost of producing steel is constant at \(£ 4\). The inverse market demand for steel is \(P=44-\) \(2 \mathrm{Q}\), where \(P\) is the price of steel and \(Q\) is the 1 quantity of steel. The air pollution associated with steel production is creating an externality given by \(£ 2 \mathrm{Q}\). Assuming that the market for steel is competitive, what is the profit- maximizing level of steel when only marginal private costs are taken into account? The marginal social costs are given by the sum of the marginal private costs plus the externality. What is the social level of steel output? Show your solution graphically. What is the social loss associated with the externality? How can we solve this externality problem using taxation?

Hypothecation is the promise to use tax revenue from a product to achieve benefits for the group who bear the tax, for example using the London congestion charge to improve London's public transport or using tobacco taxes to build health centres for smokers. (a) Why are politicians attracted by hypothecation and (b) why are economists not attracted by hypothecation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free