Consider the following very simple relationship between aggregate savings
\(S_{t}\) and aggregate income \(Y_{t}\) :
9.55 \(S_{t}=\alpha+\beta Y_{t}+\varepsilon_{t}, \quad t=1, \ldots, T\).
For some country this relationship is estimated by OLS over the years
1956-2005 \((T=50)\). The results are given in Table 9.17.
Table 9.17 Aggregate savings explained from aggregate income; OLS results
\begin{tabular}{lccr}
\hline Variable & Coefficient & Standard error & \(t\)-ratio \\
\hline constant & \(38.90\) & \(4.570\) & \(8.51\) \\
income & \(0.098\) & \(0.009\) & \(10.77\) \\
\hline\(T=50\) & \(s=22.57\) & \(R^{2}=0.93\) & \(d w=0.70\) &
\end{tabular}
Assume, for the moment, that the series \(S_{t}\) and \(Y_{t}\) are stationary.
(Hint: if needed, consult Chapter 4 for the first set of questions.)
(a) How would you interpret the coefficient estimate of \(0.098\) for the income
variable?
(b) Explain why the results indicate that there may be a problem of positive
autocorrelation. Can you give arguments why, in economic models, positive
autocorrelation is more likely than negative autocorrelation?
(c) What are the effects of autocorrelation on the properties of the OLS
estimator? Think about unbiasedness, consistency and the BLUE property.
(d) Describe two different approaches to handle the autocorrelation problem in
the above case. Which one would you prefer?
From now on, assume that \(S_{t}\) and \(Y_{t}\) are nonstationary \(I(1)\) series.
(e) Are there indications that the relationship between the two variables is
'spurious'?
(f) Explain what we mean by 'spurious regressions'.
(g) Are there indications that there is a cointegrating relationship between
\(S_{t}\) and \(Y_{t}\) ?
(h) Explain what we mean by a 'cointegrating relationship'.
(i) Describe two different tests that can be used to test the null hypothesis
that \(S_{t}\) and \(Y_{t}\) are not cointegrated.
(j) How do you interpret the coefficient estimate of \(0.098\) under the
hypothesis that \(S_{t}\) and \(Y_{t}\) are cointegrated?
(k) Are there reasons to correct for autocorrelation in the error term when we
estimate a cointegrating regression?
(1) Explain intuitively why the estimator for a cointegrating parameter is
superconsistent.
\((\mathrm{m})\) Assuming that \(S_{t}\) and \(Y_{t}\) are cointegrated, describe
what we mean by an error-correction mechanism. Give an example. What do we
learn from it?
(n) How can we consistently estimate an error-correction model?