Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Ben Bitdiddle and Alyssa P. Hacker disagree over the importance of lazy evaluation for implementing things such as unless. Ben points out that it's possible to implement unless in applicative order as a special form. Alyssa counters that, if one did that, unless would be merely syntax, not a procedure that could be used in conjunction with higher-order procedures. Fill in the details on both sides of the argument. Show how to implement unless as a derived expression (like cond or let), and give an example of a situation where it might be useful to have unless available as a procedure, rather than as a special form.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Implement `unless` as a special form to avoid evaluating all expressions, and use as a procedure for higher-order flexibility.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Applicative Order

In programming, applicative order refers to evaluating all arguments before applying the function. This would mean `unless`, if implemented in this way, would always evaluate both the condition and result expressions regardless of the condition. As a special form, `unless` ensures only one part is evaluated based on its condition.
02

Implementing Unless as a Special Form

For `unless` as a special form, we can mimic `if` constructs in languages like Scheme. If the condition is false, it would execute the consequent: ``` (define-syntax unless (syntax-rules () ((_ condition body) (if (not condition) body)))) ``` This way, `unless` allows conditional evaluation more suited for expression-based constructs, even in applicative order.
03

Discussing Alyssa's Perspective

Alyssa argues for `unless` as a higher-order procedure capable of being passed around and applied. Higher-order procedures allow more flexibility, such as composing new behavior by passing `unless` as a parameter or returning it from another function, enabling abstractions over control flow logic.
04

Implementing Unless as a Procedure

To make `unless` a regular procedure, we need lazy evaluation so that arguments are not prematurely evaluated. Using languages supporting higher-order procedures (like Python or functional paradigms), you can define `unless` to accept procedures or lambdas as parameters, deferring the evaluation until necessary.
05

Example of Using Unless as a Procedure

Consider a scenario where `unless` is needed within a control function that applies different strategies based on conditions evaluated on demand, preventing unnecessary computation early on. Passing `unless` as a higher-order function lets it integrate into and tailor broader control strategies across varying conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Applicative Order
In programming, the term "applicative order" describes a strategy where all arguments of a function are evaluated before the function itself executes. This is the standard evaluation mode in many programming languages.

Imagine you have a function `unless`. If it's implemented using applicative order, both the condition and the consequent would be evaluated at once, even before checking if the condition is true or false. This doesn't sit well with conditional expressions because it can lead to unnecessary computations.

The advantage of using applicative order lies in its predictability. By evaluating everything strictly in order, there’s no confusion about what’s been calculated and when.

However, for conditionals, this behavior can be inefficient. Using special forms can help because they allow selective evaluation based on conditions before applying any action.
Special Forms
Special forms in programming languages are constructs that don’t follow the default evaluation rules. Unlike regular functions, they choose when, or even if, to evaluate their arguments.

Take the `unless` statement as an example. When implemented as a special form, `unless` only evaluates the "body" if the "condition" is false. You can imagine it similar to an `if` statement:

  • It first checks if the condition is true.
  • If it's not true (or false), it then evaluates the body part.
This controlled evaluation ensures efficiency by executing only necessary parts, avoiding needless calculations or side effects.

In the context of special forms, `unless` isn’t a regular procedure but more of a syntax rule. This means it directs how expressions are evaluated in its scope, differing from typical function execution.
Higher-Order Procedures
Higher-order procedures are functions that can take other functions as arguments or return them as results. This gives programmers powerful tools to build flexible and reusable code.

With these procedures, you can start treating code as data, organize application flow, or create new forms of control structures. For example, consider using `unless` as a higher-order procedure. Instead of a fixed syntax, `unless` can be used flexibly within different contexts, thanks to its ability to receive and return other functions.

This capability allows dynamic programming techniques, such as:

  • Composing new operations by passing `unless` to various functions.
  • Creating callback functions that decide behavior based on the situation.
Moreover, higher-order procedures facilitate functional-style programming, enriching code with abstractions without getting bogged down in implementation details.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Ben Bitdiddle has missed one meeting too many. Fearing that his habit of forgetting meetings could cost him his job, Ben decides to do something about it. He adds all the weekly meetings of the firm to the Microshaft data base by asserting the following: (meeting accounting (Monday 9am)) (meeting administration (Monday 10am)) (meeting computer (Wednesday 3pm)) (meeting administration (Friday 1pm)) Each of the above assertions is for a meeting of an entire division. Ben also adds an entry for the company-wide meeting that spans all the divisions. All of the company's employees attend this meeting. (meeting whole-company (Wednesday \(4 \mathrm{pm}\) )) a. On Friday morning, Ben wants to query the data base for all the meetings that occur that day. What query should he use? b. Alyssa P. Hacker is unimpressed. She thinks it would be much more useful to be able to ask for her meetings by specif ying her name. So she designs a rule that says that a person's meetings include all whole-company meetings plus all meetings of that person's division. Fill in the body of Alyssa's rule. (rule (meeting-time ?person ?day-and-time) \(\langle\) rule-body \(\rangle\) ) c. Alyssa arrives at work on Wednesday morning and wonders what meetings she has to attend that day. Having defined the above rule, what query should she make to find this out?

Define a rule that says that a person is a "big shot" in a division if the person works in the division but does not have a supervisor who works in the division.

By giving the query (lives-near ?person (Hacker Alyssa P)) Alyssa P. Hacker is able to find people who live near her, with whom she can ride to work. On the other hand, when she tries to find all pairs of people who live near each other by querying (lives-near ?person-1 ?person-2) she notices that each pair of people who live near each other is listed twice; for example, (lives-near (Hacker Alyssa P) (Fect Cy D)) (lives-near (Fect Cy D) (Hacker Alyssa P)) Why does this happen? Is there a way to find a list of people who live near each other, in which each pair appears only once? Explain.

In this exercise we implement the method just described for interpreting internal definitions. We assume that the evaluator supports let (see exercise 4.6). a. Change lookup-variable-value (section 4.1.3) to signal an error if the value it finds is the symbol *unassigned*. b. Write a procedure scan-out-defines that takes a procedure body and returns an equivalent one that has no internal definitions, by making the transformation described above. c. Install scan-out-defines in the interpreter, either in make-procedure or in procedure-body (see section 4.1.3). Which place is better? Why?

Solve the following "Liars" puzzle (from Phillips 1934): Five schoolgirls sat for an examination. Their parents-so they thoughtshowed an undue degree of interest in the result. They therefore agreed that, in writing home about the examination, each girl should make one true statement and one untrue one. The following are the relevant passages from their letters: \- Betty: "Kitty was second in the examination. I was only third." \- Ethel: "You'll be glad to hear that I was on top. Joan was second." \- Joan: "I was third, and poor old Ethel was bottom." \- Kitty: "I came out second. Mary was only fourth." \- Mary: "I was fourth. Top place was taken by Betty." What in fact was the order in which the five girls were placed?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free