Chapter 3: Problem 3
Give all possible values of \(x\) that can result from executing (define \(x\) 10) (parallel-execute (lambda () (set! \(x(* x x))\) ) (lambda () (set! \(x(* x x x))\) )) Which of these possibilities remain if we instead use serialized procedures: (define \(x\) 10) (define s (make-serializer)) (parallel-execute (s (lambda () (set! \(x(* x x))\) )) )) (s (lambda () (set! \(x(* x x x))\) )
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Understanding Parallel Execution
Calculating Squaring Operation
Calculating Cubing Operation
Analyzing Parallel Outcomes
Understanding Serialized Execution
Result of Serialized Execution
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Serialization
This is essential when tasks can interfere with each other, such as updating the same variable in our example. By using serialization, like the 'make-serializer' in the exercise, we prevent the tasks of squaring and cubing the variable from running simultaneously, reducing unpredictability. It ensures the results are consistent and reliable, by forcing one task to complete before the next one begins. This method is crucial when you need to maintain a specific state or outcome.
- Controls sequence execution
- Prevents simultaneous task interference
- Ensures consistent results
Non-Determinism
In the given exercise, multiple outcomes for the variable 'x' arise because the squaring and cubing operations are executed in parallel. The end value may differ because the order in which each operation occurs can change from one execution to another. This unpredictable behavior is called non-determinism. It leads to situations where you cannot be certain of what the final result will be without additional control, such as serialization.
- Unpredictable execution order
- Different outcomes possible
- Requires control for consistency
Operations Sequencing
In programming, the order of operations can significantly affect output, particularly when they modify a shared variable. In our exercise, this is evident when considering the sequence of squaring followed by cubing versus cubing followed by squaring. These different sequences can yield different results unless a mechanism like serialization is in place to enforce a specific order. Hence, understanding and controlling the sequence is vital to ensure a program behaves as intended.
- Directs task order
- Affects program outcome
- Critical in concurrent settings
Mutable State
This mutability is both powerful and precarious. It allows for dynamic data changes but also risks unintended side effects if multiple operations change the state simultaneously. In concurrent programming, handling mutable states delicately is crucial since overlapping updates can lead to incorrect or unexpected program behavior. Serialization helps manage these mutable states by ensuring changes occur in a controlled sequence, thereby maintaining integrity and predictability.
- Data can be changed
- Allows flexibility but can introduce hazards
- Requires careful handling in concurrent environments