Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Memoization (also called tabulation) is a technique that enables a procedure to record, in a local table, values that have previously been computed. This technique can make a vast difference in the performance of a program. A memoized procedure maintains a table in which values of previous calls are stored using as keys the arguments that produced the values. When the memoized procedure is asked to compute a value, it first checks the table to see if the value is already there and, if so, just returns that value. Otherwise, it computes the new value in the ordinary way and stores this in the table. As an example of memoization, recall from section \(1.2 .2\) the exponential process for computing Fibonacci numbers: \(\begin{aligned}(\text { define }(f i b ~ n)& \\\\(\text { cond }((=\mathrm{n})&0) \\ &((=\mathrm{n} 1)&1) \\ &(e l s e(+(f i b(-\mathrm{n} 1))\\\ & &(f i b(-\mathrm{n}&2))))) \end{aligned}\) The memoized version of the same procedure is \(\begin{aligned}&\text { (define memo-fib } \\\&\text { (memoize (lambda ( } \mathrm{n} \text { ) } \\\&\begin{array}{rll}\text { (cond } & ((=\mathrm{n} & 0) & 0) \\ & ((=\mathrm{n} & 1) & 1)\end{array} \\\& & (\text { else (+ (memo-fib (-n 1)) } \\\& & \end{aligned}\) where the memoizer is defined as (define (memoize f) (let ((table (make-table))) (lambda (x) (let ((previously-computed-result (lookup x table))) (or previously-computed-result (let ((result (f x))) (insert! x result table) result)))))) Draw an environment diagram to analyze the computation of (memo-fib 3 ). Explain why memo-fib computes the \(n\)th Fibonacci number in a number of steps proportional to \(n\). Would the scheme still work if we had simply defined memo-fib to be (memoize fib)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
`memo-fib` operates linearly, checking previously computed values in a table. Redefining would cause inefficiency due to independent lambda environments.

Step by step solution

01

Setup Environment

Begin by initializing the environment for the execution of the `memo-fib` function. This includes creating a memory table to store computed results and binding the `memo-fib` name to the memoized Fibonacci function.
02

memo-fib Initialization

The `memo-fib` function is defined using a lambda expression that takes an argument \( n \). The computation is wrapped in a memoizer that handles caching results.
03

Evaluate (memo-fib 3)

When `(memo-fib 3)` is called, the memoizer first checks the table for a pre-computed result for \( n = 3 \). Since the table is initially empty, the computation proceeds.
04

Compute memo-fib(2)

The computation requires evaluating `(memo-fib 2)`. Again, the table is checked and found empty for \( n = 2 \), so it proceeds to compute this value.
05

Base Cases Computation

To find `(memo-fib 2)`, both base cases `(memo-fib 1)` and `(memo-fib 0)` need evaluation. These are base cases: `(memo-fib 1)` returns 1 and `(memo-fib 0)` returns 0, as per the Fibonacci sequence.
06

Insert Result into Table

The result of `(memo-fib 2)` is calculated as 1 by adding results from `(memo-fib 1)` and `(memo-fib 0)`. It is then stored in the table to avoid recalculating in future calls.
07

Compute memo-fib(3) Completion

With the result of `(memo-fib 2)` stored, computing `(memo-fib 3)` involves adding the results of `(memo-fib 2)` and `(memo-fib 1)` (which is already known). The result is 2, storing it in the table for future reference.
08

Memoization Efficiency

Analysis of `memo-fib` shows that each new computation checks the table first, performing actual computation only for not-yet-computed values. This makes the process linear, with steps proportional to \( n \), rather than exponential.
09

Redefining memo-fib Analysis

If `memo-fib` were defined as `(memoize fib)`, it would indeed work, though it would still recompute values for each call because the table within `memoize` would not share values across separate instances of the lambda function.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Fibonacci Sequence
The Fibonacci Sequence is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones, often starting with 0 and 1. This pattern is easy to understand but becomes exponentially intensive to compute as the series progresses using naive recursion.
This is because each function call generates two more calls until base cases are reached. Imagine computing \( F(n) \):
  • For each \( F(n) \), you compute \( F(n-1) \) and \( F(n-2) \).
  • Each \( F(n-1) \) requires \( F(n-2) \) and \( F(n-3) \), and so on.
  • This branching results in a tree structure where calculations overlap extensively.
To gain efficiency, memoization preserves previously computed values, thereby transforming this exponential task into a linear one. As demonstrated, using memoization with the Fibonacci sequence, you reduce redundant computations, storing results to reuse later in the process.
Functional Programming
Functional Programming is a paradigm focused on writing functions that avoid changing state and mutable data. It's all about composing pure functions and using higher-order functions such as `map`, `filter`, and `reduce`.
Key Characteristics:
  • Immutable State: No variables that can be changed.
  • Pure Functions: Given the same input, they always return the same output without side effects.
  • Higher-Order Functions: Functions are first-class citizens. They can be passed as arguments or returned from other functions.
In our exercise, the use of `lambda` within the `memo-fib` function is a testament to the power of functional programming. It encapsulates the Fibonacci calculation function without relying on external state changes, and it pairs well with memoization to efficiently manage state and computation.
Algorithm Optimization
Algorithm Optimization involves making your code more efficient, reducing resource consumption, or improving execution speed. Memoization is a standout technique for optimizing recursive algorithms like the Fibonacci sequence.

Benefits of memoization:
  • Reduces Time Complexity: By storing results of expensive function calls and returning the cached result when the same inputs recur, the time complexity for the Fibonacci sequence calculation becomes linear, \( O(n) \), from exponential, \( O(2^n) \).
  • Increases Efficiency: By avoiding unnecessary recalculations, the overall efficiency of the algorithm increases substantially.
To effectively optimize a recursive algorithm, focus on:
  • Identifying overlapping subproblems that can benefit from cached results.
  • Implementing a storage strategy (a dictionary or table) to hold previously calculated outputs.
Algorithm optimization, using techniques like memoization, is crucial for making systems more robust, scalable, and responsive, especially for tasks involving intensive computations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Alyssa P. Hacker is designing a system to process signals coming from physical sensors. One important feature she wishes to produce is a signal that describes the zero crossings of the input signal. That is, the resulting signal should be \(+1\) whenever the input signal changes from negative to positive, \(-1\) whenever the input signal changes from positive to negative, and 0 otherwise. (Assume that the sign of a 0 input is positive.) For example, a typical input signal with its associated zero-crossing signal would be $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllllllll} \ldots & 1 & 2 & 1.5 & 1 & 0.5 & -0.1 & -2 & -3 & -2 & -0.5 & 0.2 & 3 & 4 & \ldots \\ \ldots & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & \ldots \end{array} $$ In Alyssa's system, the signal from the sensor is represented as a stream sensedata and the stream zero-crossings is the corresponding stream of zero crossings. Alyssa first writes a procedure sign-change-detector that takes two values as arguments and compares the signs of the values to produce an appropriate 0,1 , or \(-1\). She then constructs her zero-crossing stream as follows: (define (make-zero-crossings input-stream last-value) (cons-stream (sign-change-detector (stream-car input-stream) last-value) (make-zero-crossings (stream-cdr input-stream) (stream-car input-stream)))) (define zero-crossings (make-zero-crossings sense-data 0 )) Alyssa's boss, Eva Lu Ator, walks by and suggests that this program is approximately equivalent to the following one, which uses the generalized version of stream-map from exercise 3.50: (define zero-crossings (stream-map sign-change-detector sense-data (expression))) Complete the program by supplying the indicated \langleexpression \(\rangle .\)

When we defined the evaluation model in section 1.1.3, we said that the first step in evaluating an expression is to evaluate its subexpressions. But we never specified the order in which the subexpressions should be evaluated (e.g., left to right or right to left). When we introduce assignment, the order in which the arguments to a procedure are evaluated can make a difference to the result. Define a simple procedure \(f\) such that evaluating (+ (f 0) ( \(f\) ) ) will return 0 if the arguments to \(+\) are evaluated from left to right but will return 1 if the arguments are evaluated from right to left.

Define a procedure partial-sums that takes as argument a stream \(S\) and returns the stream whose elements are \(S_{0}, S_{0}+S_{1}, S_{0}+S_{1}+S_{2}, \ldots\) For example, (partial-sums integers) should be the stream \(1,3,6,10,15, \ldots\)

In software-testing applications, it is useful to be able to count the number of times a given procedure is called during the course of a computation. Write a procedure make-monitored that takes as input a procedure, \(f\), that itself takes one input. The result returned by make-monitored is a third procedure, say mf, that keeps track of the number of times it has been called by maintaining an internal counter. If the input to \(\mathrm{mf}\) is the special symbol how-many-calls?, then \(\mathrm{mf}\) returns the value of the counter. If the input is the special symbol reset-count, then \(m f\) resets the counter to zero. For any other input, \(m f\) returns the result of calling \(f\) on that input and increments the counter. For instance, we could make a monitored version of the sqrt procedure: (define s (make-monitored sqrt)) \((\mathrm{s} 100)\) 10 \(\left(\mathrm{~s}^{\prime}\right.\) hou-many-calls?) 1

The procedures to be run during each time segment of the agenda are kept in a queue. Thus, the procedures for each segment are called in the order in which they were added to the agenda (first in, first out). Explain why this order must be used. In particular, trace the behavior of an and-gate whose inputs change from 0,1 to 1,0 in the same segment and say how the behavior would differ if we stored a segment's procedures in an ordinary list, adding and removing procedures only at the front (last in, first out).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free