Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Modify fixed-point so that it prints the sequence of approximations it generates, using the newline and display primitives shown in exercise \(1.22\). Then find a solution to \(x^{x}=1000\) by finding a fixed point of \(x \mapsto \log (1000) / \log (x)\). (Use Scheme's primitive \(\log\) procedure, which computes natural logarithms.) Compare the number of steps this takes with and without average damping. (Note that you cannot start \(\mathrm{fixed}\)-point with a guess of 1 , as this would cause division by \(\log (1)=0\).)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Without damping requires more steps; with damping, convergence is faster.

Step by step solution

01

Modify the Fixed-Point Procedure

First, let's modify the fixed-point procedure to print each approximation it generates. We will assume that there is a recursive function `fixed-point` that continues to compute until convergence is achieved. We will add a step to output each approximation using `display` and `newline`. This allows us to see how close each step brings the approximation to the correct solution.
02

Define the Function for Fixed Point Iteration

Define the function based on the transformation function you need for the fixed-point method. Here, the transformation is given by \( f(x) = \frac{\log(1000)}{\log(x)} \). Make sure to define this in a Scheme function suitable for use in the `fixed-point` method.
03

Choose an Initial Guess

Select a reasonable starting guess for the initial approximation. Since \(x = 1\) would cause division by zero (in the transformation function's denominator), choose a different starting guess, such as \(x = 2\).
04

Apply the Fixed-Point Method Without Average Damping

Run the modified fixed-point method with the chosen initial guess without average damping. Record the sequence of approximations displayed to track how quickly the method reaches a solution.
05

Implement Average Damping

To potentially improve convergence, apply average damping to the iteration. Modify the transformation function to include damping, using the formula: \( ext{damped ext{-}f}(x) = rac{x + f(x)}{2} \).
06

Apply the Fixed-Point Method With Average Damping

Run the fixed-point iteration again using the damped version of your transformation function. Again, track the sequence of approximations displayed to see if damping reduces the number of iterations needed compared to without damping.
07

Conclusion: Compare the Results

After running both approaches (with and without damping), compare the number of iterations needed in each case. You will likely find that average damping results in fewer steps to converge to the solution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Approximation Sequence
When solving equations using iterative methods, an approximation sequence is a series of progressively improved guesses that converge towards the actual solution. In the context of fixed-point iteration, we begin with an initial guess and apply a function repeatedly to get closer to the desired value.

It's essential to visualize this sequence because:
  • It helps us understand how rapidly the method converges.
  • It allows us to check the reliability of our approximations over iterations.
In our exercise, we modified the fixed-point method to print each step of the approximation sequence. By observing this output, students can see each approximation progressing toward solving the equation \( x^x = 1000 \). Implementing such modifications not only aids in debugging but is also essential for educational purposes by making the abstract iterative process tangible.
Average Damping
Average damping is a technique used to stabilize and speed up convergence in iterative methods. It involves averaging the current approximation and the next transformation's value. The formula for average damping is:\[ \text{damped-}f(x) = \frac{x + f(x)}{2} \]By incorporating this formula in the iteration process, the transformation function's output is smoothed, reducing oscillations and potentially leading to faster convergence. This approach is particularly effective when initial guesses cause divergence or when the transformation function has high sensitivity near the solutions.
The exercise demonstrates applying average damping to the fixed-point iteration for the equation \( x^x = 1000 \). By comparing results with and without damping, students get a practical insight into the utility of damping techniques in numerical methods. In many cases, damping can drastically reduce the number of iterations needed, saving computational resources and time.
Natural Logarithms
Natural logarithms are logarithms with the base \( e \), where \( e \approx 2.718 \). The natural logarithm of a number \( x \) is denoted as \( \log(x) \) or \( \ln(x) \). Natural logarithms are integral to various mathematical operations, especially those related to exponential growth, decay, and solving equations involving exponentiation.
In fixed-point iterations, transforming functions often utilize natural logarithms because they inherently handle multiplicative relationships due to their inverse nature concerning exponentials. For example, in the exercise, the transformation function \( f(x) = \frac{\log(1000)}{\log(x)} \) uses natural logarithms to manage the power equation \( x^x = 1000 \), facilitating the process of finding a fixed point solution. By leveraging natural logarithms, complex exponential problems become linear, simplifying iterative solutions and increasing computational efficiency.
Understanding the toolbox of natural logarithms in numerical methods lays a crucial foundation for tackling a wide array of mathematical problems efficiently.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The exponentiation algorithms in this section are based on performing exponentiation by means of repeated multiplication. In a similar way, one can perform integer multiplication by means of repeated addition. The following multiplication procedure (in which it is assumed that our language can only add, not multiply) is analogous to the expt procedure: (define (* a b) (if \((=b \quad 0)\) 0 \((+a(* a(-b \quad 1)))))\)

Alyssa P. Hacker doesn't see why if needs to be provided as a special form. "Why can't I just define it as an ordinary procedure in terms of cond?" she asks. Alyssa's friend Eva Lu Ator claims this can indeed be done, and she defines a new version of if: (define (new-if predicate then-clause else-clause) (cond (predicate then-clause) (else else-clause))) Eva demonstrates the program for Alyssa: (new-if (=2 3) 0 5) 5 (new-if (= 1 1) 0 5) 0 Delighted, Alyssa uses new-if to rewrite the s (define (sqrt-iter guess \(x\) ) (new-if (good-enough? guess \(x\) ) $$ \begin{array}{l}\text { guess } \\ \text { (sqrt-iter (improve guess } x \text { ) } \\ x) \text { ) }\end{array} $$ What happens when Alyssa attempts to use this to compute square roots? Explain.

Let \(f\) and \(g\) be two one-argument functions. The composition \(f\) after \(g\) is defined to be the function \(x \mapsto f(g(x))\). Define a procedure compose that implements composition. For example, if inc is a procedure that adds 1 to its argument, ((compose square inc) 6) 49

The sine of an angle (specified in radians) can be computed by making use of the approximation \(\sin x \approx x\) if \(x\) is sufficiently small, and the trigonometric identity \(\sin x=3 \sin \frac{x}{3}-4 \sin ^{3} \frac{x}{3}\) to reduce the size of the argument of \(\sin\). (For purposes of this exercise an angle is considered "sufficiently small" if its magnitude is not greater than \(0.1\) radians.) These ideas are incorporated in the following procedures: (define (cube \(x\) ) \((* x x x)\) ) (define (p \(x\) ) \((-(* 3 x)(* 4(\) cube \(x)))\) ) (define (sine angle) (if (not (> (abs angle) 0.1)) angle (p (sine (/ angle 3.0))))) a. How many times is the procedure \(\mathrm{p}\) applied when (sine 12.15) is evaluated? b. What is the order of growth in space and number of steps (as a function of \(a\) ) used by the process generated by the sine procedure when (sine a) is evaluated?

Several of the numerical methods described in this chapter are instances of an extremely general computational strategy known as iterative improvement. Iterative improvement says that, to compute something, we start with an initial guess for the answer, test if the guess is good enough, and otherwise improve the guess and continue the process using the improved guess as the new guess. Write a procedure iterative-improve that takes two procedures as arguments: a method for telling whether a guess is good enough and a method for improving a guess. Iterative-improve should return as its value a procedure that takes a guess as argument and keeps improving the guess until it is good enough. Rewrite the sqrt procedure of section \(1.1 .7\) and the fixed-point procedure of section \(1.3 .3\) in terms of iterative-improve.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free