Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

When emergency changes have to be made to systems, the system software may have to be modified before changes to the requirements have been approved. Suggest a model of a process for making these modifications that will ensure that the requirements document and the system implementation do not become inconsistent.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Develop a process that includes temporary implementation, expedited review, and updating requirements to avoid inconsistencies.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Need for Change

When an emergency change is required, quickly evaluate and clearly document the reason and necessity for the change. This step involves gathering all relevant information about the incident or situation prompting the need for modification.
02

Implement the Emergency Change Temporarily

Without waiting for full documentation approval, implement the required system software modifications temporarily to address the emergency. This allows for immediate resolution while preparing for a thorough review and approval process.
03

Document the Change Proposal

Draft a detailed change proposal that includes the modifications made, the rationale, the potential impacts, and any associated risks. This documentation should adhere to existing templates and provide a basis for future formal requirements updates.
04

Review and Approve the Change

Submit the change proposal to an expedited review board responsible for emergency changes. The review process should ensure that the change aligns with the overall system objectives and that all impacted areas have been considered.
05

Update the Requirements Document

Once the change is reviewed and approved, align the requirements document with the new system implementation. Both the documentation and the system should reflect the changes consistently.
06

Finalize and Implement Permanent Changes

Integrate the changes permanently into the system after validating that the emergency modifications meet the approved requirements. Conduct thorough testing to ensure no inconsistencies remain.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Change Management
Change management is a structured approach to shifting or transitioning individuals, teams, and organizations from a current state to a desired future state. It involves managing the people-side of change, ensuring that changes are smoothly implemented, and lasting benefits are achieved. Within the context of systems engineering, change management helps in organizing, tracking, and implementing changes efficiently.

Key Aspects of Change Management include:
  • Clear Communication: Change management requires clear communication about why changes are necessary and the benefits they will bring.
  • Planning: Develop detailed plans that outline how each change will be managed and implemented.
  • Stakeholder Involvement: Engage all stakeholders to ensure that their concerns and inputs are considered.
  • Assessment: Regular reviews of change impact and success post-implementation to learn and adapt.
Effective change management minimizes disruptions during transitions and ensures long-term success.
Handling Emergency Changes
Emergency changes are alterations that need to be implemented immediately due to unforeseen circumstances, often to address a critical issue. While these changes are necessary, they can challenge regular processes, such as approvals or thorough documentation, due to their urgent nature.

Best Practices for Managing Emergency Changes:
  • Document Immediately: Record the change as soon as possible, detailing what was done and why.
  • Assess Risks: Quickly evaluate the potential risks associated with the emergency change and mitigate them.
  • Temporary Solutions: Implement temporary measures to manage the effects of the emergency change until a permanent fix can be established.
  • Post-Assessment: Once the situation stabilizes, thoroughly review the emergency change to decide on permanent integration.
This approach ensures that while emergencies are dealt with promptly, they maintain alignment with organizational goals and system integrity.
The Role of System Documentation
System documentation is a comprehensive record of the system's architecture, design, functionality, interfaces, and operations. It serves as a reference guide for developers, testers, and stakeholders, ensuring consistency and understanding across the board.

Importance of System Documentation:
  • Clarity: Provides clear guidance on system processes and structures for current and future team members.
  • Consistency: Ensures everyone is on the same page regarding system functionalities and operations.
  • Maintenance: Aids in system maintenance by offering a detailed breakdown, which can speed up troubleshooting and updates.
  • Compliance: Helps in meeting regulatory requirements by documenting processes and changes accurately.
Thorough system documentation supports consistency, educates new team members, and facilitates smoother transitions and upgrades.
Navigating the Review and Approval Process
A review and approval process is essential to ensure that any changes made to a system are vetted and aligned with organizational goals. This process involves evaluating the proposed changes, considering their implications, and obtaining the necessary approvals from stakeholders.

Components of an Effective Review and Approval Process:
  • Expedited Review Boards: For emergency changes, have a dedicated review board that can quickly assess and approve urgent modifications.
  • Criteria-Based Approval: Only approve changes that meet predefined criteria regarding expected outcomes and risks.
  • Feedback Loop: Incorporate feedback from various stakeholders to refine and improve the change proposal.
  • Formal Records: Keep detailed records of reviewed changes and the decision-making process for accountability and learning.
This structured approach ensures changes are consistent, well-documented, and beneficial to the organization and its systems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Identify and briefly describe four types of requirement that may be defined for a computerbased system.

Discover ambiguities or omissions in the following statement of requirements for part of a ticket-issuing system: An automated ticket-issuing system sells rail tickets. Users select their destination and input a credit card and a personal identification number. The rail ticket is issued and their credit card account charged. When the user presses the start button, a menu display of potential destinations is activated, along with a message to the user to select a destination. Once a destination has been selected, users are requested to input their credit card. Its validity is checked and the user is then requested to input a personal identifier. When the credit transaction has been validated, the ticket is issued.

You have taken a job with a software user who has contracted your previous employer to develop a system for them. You discover that your company's interpretation of the requirements is different from the interpretation taken by your previous employer. Discuss what you should do in such a situation. You know that the costs to your current employer will increase if the ambiguities are not resolved. However, you have also a responsibility of confidentiality to your previous employer.

Using your knowledge of how an ATM is used, develop a set of use cases that could serve as a basis for understanding the requirements for an ATM system.

Suggest how an engineer responsible for drawing up a system requirements specification might keep track of the relationships between functional and non-functional requirements.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free