Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why should several estimation techniques be used to produce a cost estimate for a large, complex software system?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Multiple estimation techniques improve accuracy, reduce risk, and provide comprehensive insights for complex software cost estimates.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Complexity

Large, complex software systems often require extensive planning and resources due to the many interconnected parts and functionalities they encompass. Estimating the cost of developing such a system is challenging because the work involves multiple teams, technologies, and potentially unknown variables that can influence the project costs significantly.
02

Different Approaches Provide Different Insights

Each estimation technique often emphasizes different aspects of a project. For instance, analogous estimation uses similar past project data for predictions, while parametric estimation relies on statistical data and algorithms. Expert judgment takes advantage of experience and knowledge specific to the project intricacies. Using these varied techniques can provide insights into different cost elements and help balance optimism with reality.
03

Reducing Risk and Increasing Accuracy

Combining multiple estimation techniques helps to mitigate risks associated with using a single method, which might overlook certain aspects or lead to significant errors. By cross-verifying results from different methods, estimates can be fine-tuned for accuracy, considering best-case, worst-case, and most likely scenarios.
04

Adapting to Change

Large projects inevitably face changes in scope, technology, market conditions, or stakeholder requirements. Multiple estimation methods enable teams to more effectively respond to these changes by providing a comprehensive view of potential cost impacts and necessary adjustments.
05

Stakeholder Confidence and Communication

Presenting estimates derived from multiple techniques can increase stakeholder confidence as it shows a thorough and careful planning process. It also aids in transparent communication, allowing stakeholders to understand and compare different cost projection scenarios.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Large Software Projects
Large software projects are like vast jigsaw puzzles with many pieces. They involve numerous teams, each working on different functionalities. This includes architects crafting the design, developers writing code, and testers ensuring everything works perfectly.
Coordinating all these teams requires extensive planning. As projects grow larger, the complexities multiply due to interdependencies among parts. Such projects might integrate various technologies, need extended timelines, and usually face more changes along the way.
  • More people are involved, increasing communication requirements.
  • There are diverse technologies that need to work together.
  • Project timelines can span several months to years.
Understanding and managing these complexities is crucial for successful large software project execution.
Estimation Techniques
In software development, properly estimating project costs is crucial. Different estimation techniques allow teams to look at the project from various angles.
Each method brings unique strengths:
  • **Analogous Estimation**: Uses historical data from similar projects to predict costs.
  • **Parametric Estimation**: Employs statistical models and variables to forecast expenses.
  • **Expert Judgment**: Relies on the insights and experiences of seasoned professionals.
By combining these techniques, a more balanced, well-rounded estimation can be achieved. This aids in capturing diverse factors impacting the project cost and prevents reliance on a single method, which might not cover all bases.
Stakeholder Communication
Engaging stakeholders effectively is vital in any project, especially large software projects. When multiple estimation techniques are used, it can lead to more substantive discussions with stakeholders.
Transparency in presenting cost estimates is achieved by:
  • Showing comparisons across different estimation techniques.
  • Discussing potential risks and uncertainties uncovered by varied methods.
  • Aligning stakeholders' expectations with multiple scenarios.
Such comprehensive communication fosters trust and reassurance among stakeholders, as they see robust planning in action.
Project Complexity
Project complexity is a common feature of large software projects. It refers to the many interconnected components and possible challenges that a project might face. Factors increasing complexity include:
  • Integration of various technologies, potentially from different vendors.
  • Varying stakeholder requirements that may evolve over time.
  • Challenges in coordinating large teams.
Dealing with this complexity requires thoughtful planning and estimation practices. Multiple estimation techniques help navigate these intricacies by offering a broader view of potential issues and deviations, thus allowing more informed decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cost estimates are inherently risky irrespective of the estimation technique used. Suggest four ways in which the risk in a cost estimate can be reduced.

Some very large software projects involve writing millions of lines of code. Suggest how useful the cost estimation models are likely to be for such systems. Why might the assumptions on which they are based be invalid for very large software systems?

Describe two metrics that have been used to measure programmer productivity. Comment briefly on the advantages and disadvantages of each of these metrics.

Explain how the algorithmic approach to cost estimation may be used by project managers for option analysis. Suggest a situation where managers may choose an approach that is not based on the lowest project cost.

A software manager is in charge of the development of a safety-critical software system that is designed to control a radiotherapy machine to treat patients suffering from cancer. This system is embedded in the machine and must run on a special-purpose processor with a fixed amount of memory (8 Mbytes). The machine communicates with a patient database system to obtain the details of the patient and, after treatment, automatically records the radiation dose delivered and other treatment details in the database. The COCOMO method is used to estimate the effort required to develop this system and an estimate of 26 person-months is computed. All cost driver multipliers were set to 1 when making this estimate. Explain why this estimate should be adjusted to take project, personnel, product and organisational factors into account. Suggest four factors that might have significant effects on the initial COCOMO estimate and propose possible values for these factors. Justify why you have included each factor.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free