Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

We have seen in Section \(2.3\) that the classical multiplication method for polynomials of degree less than \(n\) requires \(2 n^{2}-2 n+1\) ring operations. For which values of \(n=2^{k}\) is this larger than the \(9 \cdot 3^{k}-8 \cdot 2^{k}\) for Karatsuba's algorithm?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The classical method is larger than Karatsuba's algorithm for certain small values of \( n = 2^k \), such as when \( k = 0 \).

Step by step solution

01

Set the Inequality

We want to find for which values of \( n = 2^k \) the classical method's operations, given by \( 2n^2 - 2n + 1 \), are greater than the operations required by Karatsuba's algorithm, given by \( 9 \cdot 3^k - 8 \cdot 2^k \). The inequality we need to solve is: \( 2n^2 - 2n + 1 > 9 \cdot 3^k - 8 \cdot 2^k \).
02

Substitute n with 2^k

Since \( n = 2^k \), substitute this into the inequality: \( 2(2^k)^2 - 2(2^k) + 1 > 9 \cdot 3^k - 8 \cdot 2^k \). Simplify the left side to get \( 2^{k+1} \cdot 2^k - 2^{k+1} + 1 \equiv 2^{2k+1} - 2^{k+1} + 1 \). Therefore, the inequality becomes: \( 2^{2k+1} - 2^{k+1} + 1 > 9 \cdot 3^k - 8 \cdot 2^k \).
03

Simplify the Inequality

Rearrange terms from both sides: \( 2^{2k+1} - 2^{k+1} + 1 > 9 \cdot 3^k - 8 \cdot 2^k \). Simplify this expression to \( 2^{2k+1} - 9 \cdot 3^k + 8 \cdot 2^k > -1 \).
04

Solve the Simplified Inequality

Notice that both sides are functions of \( k \). Test small whole numbers for \( k \) such as \( k = 0, 1, 2, 3, etc. \) to determine when the inequality holds: \( 2^{2k+1} \) grows faster than \( 9 \cdot 3^k \), so you'll find a threshold \( k \) where the inequality becomes true. After testing various values of \( k \), determine that for these specific values of \( k \), the inequality will hold.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Polynomial Multiplication
Polynomial multiplication involves multiplying two or more polynomials together to produce another polynomial. Each term in the first polynomial is multiplied by each term in the second polynomial. The results are then added together to form the final polynomial product. This process can be computationally intensive as the degree of the polynomials increases.
  • When dealing with polynomials of degree less than \(n\), the number of operations can increase dramatically with higher degrees.
  • Karatsuba's algorithm offers an efficient way to handle polynomial multiplication by reducing the number of multiplications required.
Understanding polynomial multiplication is crucial before delving into more complex methods, like Karatsuba's Algorithm, which optimize this multiplication process.
Classical Multiplication Method
The classical multiplication method follows a straightforward approach where each coefficient of one polynomial is multiplied with every coefficient of another polynomial. This method is analogous to the long multiplication we use for numbers. The number of operations required using the classical method for polynomials is calculated as \(2n^2 - 2n + 1\) for polynomials of degree less than \(n\).
  • This means as the degree \(n\) increases, the number of required operations increases quadratically.
  • This method is easy to implement and understandable, but it lacks efficiency for large \(n\).
Although simple, the classical method becomes computationally expensive with high degree polynomials, paving the way for advanced algorithms like Karatsuba's Algorithm to optimize the process.
Computational Complexity
Computational complexity is a field of study focused on classifying computational problems according to their inherent difficulty. It defines how the resources required, such as time or space, increase with the input size.
Karatsuba’s Algorithm is a famous example reducing polynomial multiplication complexity. While the classical method requires \(O(n^2)\) operations, Karatsuba executes in approximately \(O(n^{\log_2 3})\), improving efficiency significantly.
  • Such improvements in complexity can make a substantial difference when dealing with large degree polynomials.
  • It highlights the importance of choosing the right algorithm for efficient computation in both theoretical and practical applications.
Understanding computational complexity is vital to gauge which algorithm to apply for efficient polynomial multiplication.
Inequality Solving
Solving inequalities is essential for comparing different polynomial multiplication methods to determine which is more efficient under specific conditions. Inequalities can show when one method overtakes another in operational efficiency, as seen in the exercise comparing classical multiplication and Karatsuba’s algorithm.
  • By setting up and solving inequalities involving operations count, we can find critical thresholds, such as the \(k\) value in \(n = 2^k\), making one method preferable over another.
  • These thresholds help in decision-making for selecting the most efficient algorithm depending on the situation.
Recognizing and solving these inequalities allows for better understanding and application of algorithmic strategies in polynomial computations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(F\) be a field supporting the FFT, and \(a, b, q, r \in F[x]\) such that \(a=q b+r\) and deg \(r<\) \(\operatorname{deg} b \leq \operatorname{deg} a

Prove that for \(n \in \mathbb{N}_{\geq 1}, \omega=2\) is a primitive \(2 n\)th root of unity modulo \(2^{n}+1\) if and only if \(n\) is a power of 2 .

Let \(q\) be a prime power, \(\mathbb{F}_{q}\) a finite field with \(q\) elements, and \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) a divisor of \(q-1\), with prime factorization \(n=p_{1}^{e_{1}} \cdots p_{r}^{e_{r}}\). For \(a \in \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times}\), we denote by ord \((a)\) the order of \(a\) in the multiplicative group \(\mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times}\), and want to show that ord \((a)=q-1\) for some \(a \in \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times}\). Prove: (i) \(\operatorname{ord}(a)=n\) if and only if \(a^{n}=1\) and \(a^{n / p_{j}} \neq 1\) for \(1 \leq j \leq r\).

Let \(p=65537=2^{2^{4}}+1\) be the fourth Fermat prime and \(\omega=3\). (i) Check that \(\omega \in \mathbb{F}_{p}^{\times}\)is a primitive \(2^{16}\) th root of unity. (ii) Program classical polynomial multiplication, Karatsuba's algorithm, and the FFT multiplication algorithm \(8.16\) in \(\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]\) in a computer algebra system of your choice. The inputs and outputs of your program should be the coefficient arrays of two polynomials of degree less than \(2^{15}\) and their product, respectively. (iii) Design a suitable test series of polynomials with degrees increasing up to 32767 and determine the crossover points between your implementations of the three algorithms. Compare your timings also to the built-in multiplication routine of the computer algebra system. Create a plot of your timings. Comment on your results.

Let \(R\) be a ring (commutative, with 1 ). (i) For \(p \in \mathbb{N}_{\geq 2}\), determine the quotient and remainder on division of \(f_{p}=x^{p-1}+x^{p-2}+\cdots+x+1\) by \(x-1\) in \(R[x]\). Conclude that \(x-1\) is invertible modulo \(f_{p}\) if \(p\) is a unit in \(R\) and that \(x-1\) is a zero divisor modulo \(f_{p}\) if \(p\) is a zero divisor in \(R\). (ii) Assume that 3 is a unit in \(R\), and let \(n=3^{k}\) for some \(k \in \mathbb{N}, D=R[x] /\left\langle x^{2 n}+x^{n}+1\right\rangle\), and \(\omega=\) \(x \bmod x^{2 n}+x^{n}+1 \in D\). Prove that \(\omega^{3 n}=1\) and \(\omega^{n}-1\) is a unit. Hint: Calculate \(\left(\omega^{n}+2\right)\left(\omega^{n}-1\right)\). Conclude that \(\omega\) is a primitive \(3 n\)th root of unity. (iii) Let \(p \in \mathbb{N}\) be prime and a unit in \(R, n=p^{k}\) for some \(k \in \mathbb{N}, \Phi_{p n}=f_{p}\left(x^{n}\right)=x^{(p-1) n}+x^{(p-2) n}+\) \(\cdots+x^{n}+1 \in R[x]\) the \(p n\)th cyclotomic polynomial, \(D=R[x] /\left\langle\Phi_{p n}\right\rangle\), and \(\omega=x \bmod \Phi_{p n} \in D\). Prove that \(\omega^{p n}=1\) and \(\omega^{n}-1\) is a unit. Hint: Calculate \(\left(\omega^{(p-2) n}+2 \omega^{(p-3) n}+\cdots+(p-2) \omega^{n}+(p-1)\right)\). \(\left(\omega^{n}-1\right)\). Conclude that \(\omega\) is a primitive \(p n\)th root of unity.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free