Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which of the following finite subsets of \(\mathbb{Q}[x, y, z]\) are Gröbner bases with respect to \(\prec=\prec\) lex? Which are minimal or even reduced? (i) \(\left\\{x+y, y^{2}-1\right\\}\) for \(x \succ y\), (ii) \(\left\\{y+x, y^{2}-1\right\\}\) for \(y \succ x\), (iii) \(\left\\{x^{2}+y^{2}-1, x y-1, x+y^{3}-y\right\\}\) for \(x \succ y\), (iv) \(\left\\{x y z-1, x-y, y^{2} z-1\right\\}\) for \(x \succ y \succ z\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Sets (i) and (ii) are reduced Gröbner bases; (iii) and (iv) are not.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze polynomial set (i)

The set \( \{ x+y, y^2-1 \} \) is for order \( x \succ y \). Check leading terms. The leading term of \( x+y \) is \( x \), and for \( y^2-1 \) it's \( y^2 \). Since they involve different variables sequentially ordered in \( x \succ y \), they form a Gröbner basis. Verify minimality: both polynomials are needed for the leading terms. To check if it's reduced, the polynomials have no monomial that's redundant beyond leading terms.
02

Analyze polynomial set (ii)

The set \( \{ y+x, y^2-1 \} \) is for order \( y \succ x \). The leading term of \( y+x \) is \( y \), and for \( y^2-1 \) it's \( y^2 \). After dividing terms, \( y \) complements \( y^2 \) as needed, maintaining a Gröbner basis. To check the minimality, similar reasons confirm its minimal and checking reduced idx shows no derivations indicate redundancy with term coefficients.
03

Analyze polynomial set (iii)

The set \( \{ x^2+y^2-1, xy-1, x+y^3-y \} \) sets \( x \succ y \). The leading term of each polynomial \( x^2, xy, \) and \( x \), covers terms sufficiently diverse to form a Gröbner basis. Check minimality by examining unnecessary polynomials. \( xy-1 \) and \( x \), check reduced by analyzing no cancels of similar monomials unless lead terms.
04

Analyze polynomial set (iv)

The set \( \{ xyz-1, x-y, y^2z-1 \} \) for order \( x \succ y \succ z \). The leading term of each \( xyz, x, y^2z \) maintains diversity for a potential Gröbner basis. Testing implies S-polynomial reduction validation may hold leading terms diverse and disjoint. Verify terms have no common factor leading to unnecessary elements, confirming reduced form is already simplified.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Polynomials
Polynomials are mathematical expressions involving variables and coefficients, joined together using operations like addition and multiplication.
They can have one or more terms, such as \( x^2 + y + 1 \) being a polynomial with three terms. In the context of Gröbner bases, polynomials serve as building blocks for forming ideals in a polynomial ring.

When dealing with polynomials in this context, we often use complex algebraic structures like multivariate polynomials, which involve more than one variable. This allows us to explore behaviors and interactions between different variables.
  • Each term in a polynomial is made up of a product of coefficients and variables raised to some power.
  • The degree of a polynomial is determined by the term with the highest total exponent.
  • Understanding how polynomials are structured helps in categorizing and solving polynomial systems.
They are fundamental in both pure and applied mathematics, appearing in everything from solving equations to modeling real-world phenomena.
Leading Terms in Polynomials
The concept of the *leading term* in a polynomial is crucial when dealing with Gröbner bases. The leading term of a polynomial is defined as the term with the highest degree based on a specified ordering in its variables.
This term exhibits the polynomial's "dominant" behavior in computations and simplifications, particularly when considering polynomial division.
The leading term often guides decision-making in algebraic processes, for instance:
  • Identifying key factors in polynomial identities.
  • Determining ordering in a reduction or simplification process.
  • Playing a pivotal role in the reduction of polynomial systems into Gröbner bases.
For a polynomial like \( x^2 + 3xy + y^2 \), if variables are ordered with \( x \succ y \), the leading term is \( x^2 \). This dictates the main term against which others are compared during various operations, mainly when checking membership in an algebriac ideal.
Lexicographic Order in Polynomials
Lexicographic order is a way to arrange the terms of polynomials, similar to how words are ordered in a dictionary.
This ordering is significant in forming Gröbner bases, where choosing the correct term order can drastically simplify calculations and derivations.

In lexicographic ordering, variables are prioritized according to a preset hierarchy. For example, if we decide \( x \succ y \succ z \), any polynomial term involving \( x \) will always precede those only involving \( y \) or \( z \). This results in:
  • Order decisions that inform polynomial reduction and simplification strategies.
  • Ensuring consistency across computations within Gröbner bases.
  • Guiding the algebraic algorithm in checking polynomial independence.
Using lexicographic ordering aligns the polynomial terms against an objective rule, aiding in establishing fair comparisons in complex algebraic systems. Understanding this ordering ensures that students use the same assumptions in polynomial manipulation.
Redundancy in Polynomials
Redundancy in polynomials refers to unnecessary or repetitive terms or factors within a set of polynomials.
The idea is to simplify polynomial expressions or bases by removing redundant elements that do not contribute unique information.
This becomes particularly important in the context of Gröbner bases, as maintaining a minimal set of polynomials ensures efficiency in computations.

When a polynomial set is free of redundancy, it implies that no polynomial can be removed without losing the generation ability of the basis.
  • Assess each polynomial's necessity in terms of contributing to the leading coefficients and terms of the basis.
  • Ensure that no polynomial is a combination of others in the set.
  • Verify that reduction processes uphold a basis's properties without unnecessary complexity.
By minimizing redundancy, students and mathematicians alike ensure that they work with the simplest and most efficient model of a polynomial system, maximizing performance in solving algebraic problems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Besides the usual Cartesian coordinates \((u, v)\) with \(u, v \in \mathbb{R}\), we represent the points of the plane by polar coordinates \((r, \varphi)\) with \(r \in \mathbb{R}\) and \(0 \leq \varphi<2 \pi\). This representation is not unique; for example, when \(\varphi<\pi\) then \((r, \varphi)\) and \((-r, \varphi+\pi)\) represent the same point. We obtain the polar coordinates from the Cartesian ones by the formulas \(u=r \cos \varphi\), and \(v=r \sin \varphi\). Now consider the curve \(C=\\{(r, \varphi): 0 \leq \varphi<2 \pi\) and \(r=\sin 2 \varphi\\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{2}\), and let \(I=\left\langle\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right)^{3}-4 x^{2} y^{2}\right\rangle \subseteq \mathbb{R}[x, y]\). (i) Create a plot of \(C\). (ii) Using the addition formulas for sine and cosine, show that \(C \subseteq V(I)\). (iii) Prove that also the reverse inclusion \(V(I) \subseteq C\) holds (be careful with the signs).

Show that for each \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) there exists a monomial ideal \(I \subseteq \mathbb{Q}[x, y]\) such that every basis of \(I\) has at least \(n\) elements.

Let \(<\) be an order on a set \(S\). Prove that \(\alpha<\beta\) implies \(\beta \nless \alpha\) for all \(\alpha, \beta \in S\).

Let \(F\) be a field, \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), and \(A=\left(a_{i j}\right)_{1 \leq i, j \leq n} \in F^{n \times n}\) a square matrix. Moreover, let \(G_{A}=\) \(\left\\{\sum_{1 \leq j \leq n} a_{i j} x_{j}: 1 \leq i \leq n\right\\} \subseteq F\left[x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n}\right]\) be the set of linear polynomials corresponding to the rows of \(A\) and \(I_{A}=\left\langle G_{A}\right\rangle\). Then \(V\left(G_{A}\right)=V\left(I_{A}\right)\) is equal to ker \(A\), the set of solutions \(v \in F^{n}\) of the linear system \(A v=0\). Prove: (i) \(I_{L A}=I_{A}\) if \(L \in F^{n \times n}\) is nonsingular. (ii) Assume that there exists a nonsingular matrix \(L \in F^{n \times n}\) such that $$ U=L A=\left(\begin{array}{cc} I_{r} & V \\ 0 & 0 \end{array}\right) $$ where \(r\) is the rank of \(A, I_{r}\) is the \(r \times r\) identity matrix, and \(V \in F^{r \times(n-r)}\) (this means that no column exchange is necessary when applying Gaussian elimination to \(A\) ). Prove that \(G_{U}\) is a reduced Gröbner basis of \(I_{A}\) with respect to any monomial order \(\prec\) such that \(x_{1} \succ x_{2} \succ \cdots \succ x_{n}\). (iii) What is the reduced Gröbner basis of \(I_{A}\) if \(A\) is nonsingular, with respect to an arbitrary monomial order?

Let \(F\) be a field and \(x, y\) indeterminates. Prove that the two ideals \(\langle x, y\rangle\) and \(\langle\operatorname{gcd}(x, y)\rangle\) in \(F[x, y]\) are distinct, and conclude that \(F[x, y]\) is not Euclidean.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free