Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Here are the irreducible factorizations of the monic polynomial \(f \in Z[x]\) of degree 6 modulo some small primes: $$ \begin{aligned} &f=(x+1)^{2} \cdot\left(x^{2}+x+1\right) \cdot\left(x^{4}+x^{3}+x^{2}+x+1\right) \in \mathbb{F}_{2}[x] \\ &f=(x+3) \cdot\left(x^{3}+3\right) \cdot\left(x^{4}+4 x^{3}+2 x^{2}+x+4\right) \in \mathbb{F}_{7}[x] \\ &f=(x+9) \cdot\left(x^{2}+2 x+4\right) \cdot\left(x^{5}+5\right) \in \mathbb{F}_{11}[x] \end{aligned} $$ What can you say about the degrees of the irreducible factors of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The irreducible factors of \( f \) in \( \mathbb{Z}[x] \) could be of degree 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Modulo Reductions

First, we notice that the polynomial \( f \) has been reduced modulo small primes, specifically \( \mathbb{F}_2 \), \( \mathbb{F}_7 \), and \( \mathbb{F}_{11} \). Understanding how a polynomial behaves under different modulo bases can reveal the structure of its irreducibility and factorization.
02

Analyzing Mod 2 Factorization

The polynomial \( f \) is factored as \((x+1)^2 \cdot (x^2 + x + 1) \cdot (x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1)\) over \( \mathbb{F}_2[x] \). This suggests potential repeated linear factors and a quadratic and quartic factor that are irreducible over \( \mathbb{F}_2 \).
03

Analyzing Mod 7 Factorization

In \( \mathbb{F}_7[x] \), \( f \) is factored as \((x+3) \cdot (x^3+3) \cdot (x^4+4x^3+2x^2+x+4)\), implying the presence of a linear, a cubic, and a quartic irreducible factor over \( \mathbb{F}_7[x] \).
04

Analyzing Mod 11 Factorization

The factorization \((x+9) \cdot (x^2+2x+4) \cdot (x^5+5)\) in \( \mathbb{F}_{11}[x] \) signifies potential linear, quadratic, and quintic irreducible factors over \( \mathbb{F}_{11}[x] \).
05

Concluding the Degree Analysis

Considering all modulo cases together, the degrees of irreducible factors in \( \mathbb{Z}[x] \) suggest that one can expect to potentially have linear, quadratic, cubic, quartic, and quintic irreducible factors because these degrees collectively appear across different fields. The gcd of differences of degrees (lines of same max coeff) across fields typically indicate potential degrees.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Factorization
Factorization is the process of breaking down a complex mathematical expression into simpler, "irreducible" components called factors. When dealing with polynomials, factorization involves expressing a polynomial as a product of its irreducible polynomial factors. These factors cannot be further divided.
In the example exercise, various polynomials were factored over finite fields with small modulo bases. Each factorization sheds light on the structure of the polynomial, providing insight into its irreducibility. When analyzing factorization, it's important to identify whether any of the factors are repeated and to consider how factors behave under different moduli.
Understanding factorization is key to simplifying expressions and solving polynomial equations.
Modulo Reduction
Modulo reduction involves taking the coefficients of a polynomial and replacing them by their residues when divided by a given number, known as the modulus. This process is employed to study polynomials over finite fields, such as \( \mathbb{F}_2, \mathbb{F}_7, \text{and} \mathbb{F}_{11} \).
In simpler terms, modulo reduction means we perform calculations in "blocks" where numbers wrap around upon reaching the modulus. For example, within \( \mathbb{F}_2 \), numbers behave like binary digits, restricted to just 0 and 1.
  • Helps in finding factorization patterns.
  • Simplifies the analysis of polynomials.
  • Useful in applications such as cryptography and error correction codes.
Understanding how polynomials reduce modulo various primes helps determine the most efficient factorization technique and provides insights into potential irreducible polynomials over integers.
Polynomial Degree
The degree of a polynomial is the highest degree of its terms. It indicates the polynomial's complexity and the number of roots it might have. For example, a polynomial like \(x^6 + 3x^4 - x^2 + 2 \) is of degree 6 because the highest power of \(x\) is 6.
In the exercise, the polynomial's degree affects the factorization results: over different fields, factors of differing degrees are observed, such as linear, quadratic, cubic, quartic, and quintic factors. Each degree reflects a different level of irreducibility:
  • Linear factor implies a direct root (solution).
  • Quadratic may have real or complex roots.
  • Higher degrees suggest combinations of multiple irreducible terms.
Understanding polynomial degrees is essential for efficiently solving polynomial equations, determining behavior under transformation, and studying their algebraic structure.
Algebraic Structures
Algebraic structures give us a framework to comprehensively understand polynomials and their behavior under various operations. They define essential properties like closure, associativity, and the existence of identity elements. Some key algebraic structures related to polynomials include fields, rings, and groups.
For polynomials, particularly those under modulo operations, the structure of fields like \( \mathbb{F}_2 \) or \( \mathbb{F}_7 \) provides a controlled environment for factorization and irreducibility analysis.
  • A ring is a set equipped with two binary operations (usually addition and multiplication).
  • A field extends a ring by ensuring that division is possible, except by zero.
  • Groups focus solely on one operation, ensuring closure under it.
By exploring these algebraic structures, we can better understand the properties and behaviors of polynomials, especially when analyzing them over different finite fields.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(f=x^{15}-1 \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\). Take a nontrivial factorization \(f \equiv g h \bmod 2\) with \(g, h \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) monic and of degree at least 2 . Compute \(g^{*}, h^{*} \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) such that $$ f \equiv g^{*} h^{*} \bmod 16, \quad \operatorname{deg} g^{*}=\operatorname{deg} g, \quad g^{*} \equiv g \bmod 2 . $$ Show your intermediate results. Can you guess some factors of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) ?

Suppose that the monic polynomial \(f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) has degree 8 , and \(p\) is a prime so that \(f\) mod \(p=g_{1} g_{2} g_{3}\) factors into three irreducible and pairwise coprime polynomials \(g_{1}, g_{2}, g_{3} \in \mathbb{F}_{p}[x]\) with \(\operatorname{deg} g_{1}=1\), \(\operatorname{deg} g_{2}=2\), and \(\operatorname{deg} g_{3}=5\). (i) What can you say about the possible factorizations of \(f\) modulo \(p^{100}\) ? (ii) What can you say about the possible factorizations of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\) ? (iii) Suppose \(q\) is another prime for which \(f \bmod q=h_{1} h_{2}\) with \(h_{1}, h_{2} \in \mathbb{F}_{q}[x]\) irreducible and deg \(h_{1}=\) deg \(h_{2}=4\). What can you say about the possible factorizations of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\), using all this information?

Compute the coefficients of the Swinnerton-Dyer polynomial $$ f=(x+\sqrt{-1}+\sqrt{2})(x+\sqrt{-1}-\sqrt{2})(x-\sqrt{-1}+\sqrt{2})(x-\sqrt{-1}-\sqrt{2}) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] $$ and its factorizations modulo \(p=2,3,5\). Prove that \(f\) is irreducible.

Let \(N=p_{1} \cdots p_{s}\) be a product of \(s\) distinct primes, and \(f \in \mathbb{Z}_{N}[x]\) be monic and squarefree. (i) Let \(g_{1} \in \mathbb{Z}_{p_{1}}[x]\) be irreducible, and \(g \in \mathbb{Z}_{N}[x]\) with \(g \equiv g_{1} \bmod p_{1}\) and \(g \equiv 1 \bmod p_{i}\) for \(i \geq 2\). Prove that \(g\) is irreducible in \(\mathbb{Z}_{N}[x]\). (ii) Assume that we have factored \(f\) modulo each \(p_{i}\). Determine the factorization of \(f\) into irreducible polynomials in \(\mathbb{Z}_{N}[x]\). How many irreducible factors are there, in terms of the numbers of irreducible factors modulo each \(p_{i}\) ? (iii) How many irreducible factors does \(x^{3}-x\) have modulo 105 ? Find four of them.

A partition of a positive integer \(n\) is a sequence \(\lambda=\left(\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{r}\right)\) of positive integers such that \(\lambda_{1} \geq \cdots \geq \lambda_{r}\) and \(n=\lambda_{1}+\cdots+\lambda_{r} ; r\) is the length of the partition. For example, if \(F\) is a field and \(f \in F[x]\) of degree \(n\), then the factorization pattern of \(f\), with the degrees of the factors in descending order, is a partition of \(n\). If \(\lambda=\left(\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{r}\right)\) and \(\mu=\left(\mu_{1}, \ldots, \mu_{s}\right)\) are two partitions of \(n\), then we say that \(\lambda\) is finer than \(\mu\) and write \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \mu\) if there is a surjective map \(\sigma:\\{1, \ldots, r\\} \longrightarrow\\{1, \ldots, s\\}\) such that \(\mu_{i}=\sum_{\sigma(j)=i} \lambda_{j}\) for all \(i \leq s\). For example, \(\lambda=(4,2,1,1)\) is finer than \(\mu=(5,3)\), as furnished by \(\sigma(1)=\sigma(3)=1\) and \(\sigma(2)=\sigma(4)=2\). (The function \(\sigma\) need not be unique.) In particular, \((n)\) is the coarsest and \((1,1, \ldots, 1)\) is the finest partition of \(n\). (i) Prove that if \(f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) has degree \(n\) and \(p \in \mathbb{N}\) is prime, \(\mu\) is the factorization pattern of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\), and \(\lambda\) is the factorization pattern of \(f \bmod p\) in \(\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]\), then \(\mu \succcurlyeq \lambda\). (ii) Show that \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \lambda, \lambda \preccurlyeq \mu \Longrightarrow \neg(\mu \preccurlyeq \lambda)\), and \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \mu \preccurlyeq \nu \Longrightarrow \lambda \preccurlyeq \nu\) holds for all partitions \(\lambda\), \(\mu, \nu\) of \(n\), so that \(\preccurlyeq\) is a partial order on the set of all partitions of \(n\). (iii) Enumerate all partitions of \(n=8\), and draw them in form of a directed graph, with an edge from \(\lambda\) to \(\mu\) if \(\mu\) is a direct successor of \(\lambda\) with respect to the order \(\preccurlyeq\), so that \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \mu, \lambda \neq \mu\), and \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \nu \preccurlyeq \mu \Longrightarrow \lambda=\nu\) or \(\nu=\mu\) for all partitions \(\nu\). (iv) Use (iii) to show that there exist partitions \(\lambda, \mu\) of 8 that do not have a supremum with respect to \(\preccurlyeq\). (Thus the partitions do not form a "lattice" in the sense of order theory, not to be confused with the \(\mathbb{Z}\)-module lattices in Chapter 16.) (v) Let \(a_{n, r}\) denote the number of partitions of \(n\) of length \(r\). Thus \(a_{n, 1}=a_{n, n}=1\) and \(a_{n, r}=0\) for \(1 \leq n

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free