Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(f=x^{15}-1 \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\). Take a nontrivial factorization \(f \equiv g h \bmod 2\) with \(g, h \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) monic and of degree at least 2 . Compute \(g^{*}, h^{*} \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) such that $$ f \equiv g^{*} h^{*} \bmod 16, \quad \operatorname{deg} g^{*}=\operatorname{deg} g, \quad g^{*} \equiv g \bmod 2 . $$ Show your intermediate results. Can you guess some factors of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Factors modulo 16 are achieved via Hensel's lemma. Potential factors in \( \mathbb{Z}[x] \): \( x^3 - 1 \) and its components.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Polynomial Modulo 2

First, we need to determine the polynomial \( f \equiv x^{15} - 1 \pmod{2} \). Since \(-1\equiv 1\pmod{2}\), we have \( f \equiv x^{15} + 1 \equiv x^{15} + 1 \equiv x^{15} - 1 \pmod{2} \). The expression simplifies to \( f \equiv x^{15} + 1 \equiv x^{15} + 1 \equiv x^{15} - 1 \pmod{2} \).
02

Identify Nontrivial Factorization Modulo 2

We need to do a nontrivial factorization of \( x^{15} - 1 \equiv (x^3 - 1)(x^{12} + x^9 + x^6 + x^3 + 1) \pmod{2} \). Here \( g = x^3 - 1 \equiv (x+1)(x^2 + x + 1) \pmod{2} \) and \( h = x^{12} + x^9 + x^6 + x^3 + 1 \) are both monic polynomials.
03

Lift the Factorization from Modulo 2 to Modulo 4

We begin lifting this solution from modulo 2 to modulo 4, determining corrections for \( g \) and \( h \) such that \( g^* h^* \equiv x^{15} - 1 \pmod{4} \). We adjust \( g = x^3 - 1 + 2A(x) \) and \( h = x^{12} + x^9 + x^6 + x^3 + 1 + 2B(x) \).
04

Solve Lifting using the Hensel's Lemma

To apply Hensel's Lemma, we solve \( x^{15} - 1 \equiv (x^3 - 1 + 2A(x))(x^{12} + x^9 + x^6 + x^3 + 1 + 2B(x)) \pmod{4} \). Simplifying this modulo 4 gives equations for \( A(x) \) and \( B(x) \) which we solve sequentially.
05

Lift the Solution to Modulo 8 and 16

Similarly, we can continue using Hensel's lemma to lift our factorization, increasing the power of 2 in the modulus step-by-step: modulo 8 and then to modulo 16. Each step involves finding appropriate \( A(x) \) and \( B(x) \) to satisfy the congruence at higher moduli.
06

Finalize Monic Polynomial Factors Modulo 16

After lifting steps, ensure that \( g^*, h^* \) remain monic and meet the criteria: \( f \equiv g^*h^* \equiv 0 \pmod{16} \), \( \operatorname{deg} g^{*} = 3 \), and \( g^* \equiv g \equiv x^3 - 1 \pmod{2} \).
07

Guess Factors of Polynomial in Integer Polynomials

Since \( x^3 - 1 = (x-1)(x^2+x+1) \) and \( x^{12} + x^9 + x^6 + x^3 + 1 \) is another factor, they can be candidates for the factors of polynomial \( f = x^{15} - 1 \) in \( \mathbb{Z}[x] \). These patterns often repeat, suggesting potential cyclotomic polynomial factors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hensel's Lemma
Hensel's Lemma is a powerful tool used to lift solutions of polynomial congruences from a lower modulus to a higher modulus. This technique is particularly useful when dealing with polynomial factorization problems in modular arithmetic. The lemma provides a systematic way to refine approximations in steps, allowing us to construct solutions
with an increasing modulus until we achieve the desired precision.

In the context of factorizing polynomials, Hensel's Lemma helps ensure that if a polynomial can be factored modulo a small prime (like 2), this factorization can be lifted to a power of that prime (such as 4, 8, 16, etc.).
This enables us to maintain the factorization in a larger ring, which can be crucial for understanding the structure of polynomials in integer rings.

The typical process involves finding integers or polynomials \(A(x)\) and \(B(x)\) such that corrections satisfy the congruence. Each lifting step often requires solving specific equations to ensure the factorization holds as the modulus increases. This provides a practical approach to solving complex polynomial congruences.
Lifting Techniques
Lifting Techniques refer to the process of elevating a solution from a simpler, smaller modulus problem to a more complex, larger modulus one. The purpose is to achieve a more precise solution by incrementally resolving additional detail at each lifting stage.

When applying these techniques in polynomial factorization, one begins by factoring the polynomial under a small modulus. After achieving a factorization like \(f \equiv gh \pmod{2}\), adjustments are made to account for higher moduli (for example, 4, 8, or 16). This means tweaking the factors, usually by adding polynomials multiplied by the higher modulus factor.

The process employs recursive corrections, typically represented by polynomials \(A(x)\) and \(B(x)\), which adjust initial factors to maintain the congruence across the desired modulus levels. This meticulous approach ensures that the factorization is not only preserved but refined in higher precision domains, crucial for applications involving complex integer polynomials.
Modulo Arithmetic
Modulo Arithmetic is a mathematical system dealing with integers and their remainders after division by a number (the modulus). It simplifies calculations by focusing only on residue classes.

In the realm of polynomial factorization, modulo arithmetic allows us to explore the properties of polynomials over integers by examining them under different moduli. This simplification is particularly handy when trying to determine factorizations by reducing the complexity of operations and, subsequently, problems.

Understanding modulo arithmetic is key when employing techniques like Hensel's Lemma and lifting techniques since these rely heavily on the arithmetic properties of congruences. For example, when calculating \(f \equiv x^{15} - 1 \pmod{2}\), it's essential to handle operations correctly under the modulus to progress toward the final goal. Practicing such problems sharpens one's ability to handle equations across modular systems, which is a common requirement in many advanced fields such as cryptography and error correcting codes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here are the irreducible factorizations of the monic polynomial \(f \in Z[x]\) of degree 6 modulo some small primes: $$ \begin{aligned} &f=(x+1)^{2} \cdot\left(x^{2}+x+1\right) \cdot\left(x^{4}+x^{3}+x^{2}+x+1\right) \in \mathbb{F}_{2}[x] \\ &f=(x+3) \cdot\left(x^{3}+3\right) \cdot\left(x^{4}+4 x^{3}+2 x^{2}+x+4\right) \in \mathbb{F}_{7}[x] \\ &f=(x+9) \cdot\left(x^{2}+2 x+4\right) \cdot\left(x^{5}+5\right) \in \mathbb{F}_{11}[x] \end{aligned} $$ What can you say about the degrees of the irreducible factors of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) ?

Compute the coefficients of the Swinnerton-Dyer polynomial $$ f=(x+\sqrt{-1}+\sqrt{2})(x+\sqrt{-1}-\sqrt{2})(x-\sqrt{-1}+\sqrt{2})(x-\sqrt{-1}-\sqrt{2}) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] $$ and its factorizations modulo \(p=2,3,5\). Prove that \(f\) is irreducible.

Suppose that the monic polynomial \(f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) has degree 8 , and \(p\) is a prime so that \(f\) mod \(p=g_{1} g_{2} g_{3}\) factors into three irreducible and pairwise coprime polynomials \(g_{1}, g_{2}, g_{3} \in \mathbb{F}_{p}[x]\) with \(\operatorname{deg} g_{1}=1\), \(\operatorname{deg} g_{2}=2\), and \(\operatorname{deg} g_{3}=5\). (i) What can you say about the possible factorizations of \(f\) modulo \(p^{100}\) ? (ii) What can you say about the possible factorizations of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\) ? (iii) Suppose \(q\) is another prime for which \(f \bmod q=h_{1} h_{2}\) with \(h_{1}, h_{2} \in \mathbb{F}_{q}[x]\) irreducible and deg \(h_{1}=\) deg \(h_{2}=4\). What can you say about the possible factorizations of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\), using all this information?

A partition of a positive integer \(n\) is a sequence \(\lambda=\left(\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{r}\right)\) of positive integers such that \(\lambda_{1} \geq \cdots \geq \lambda_{r}\) and \(n=\lambda_{1}+\cdots+\lambda_{r} ; r\) is the length of the partition. For example, if \(F\) is a field and \(f \in F[x]\) of degree \(n\), then the factorization pattern of \(f\), with the degrees of the factors in descending order, is a partition of \(n\). If \(\lambda=\left(\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{r}\right)\) and \(\mu=\left(\mu_{1}, \ldots, \mu_{s}\right)\) are two partitions of \(n\), then we say that \(\lambda\) is finer than \(\mu\) and write \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \mu\) if there is a surjective map \(\sigma:\\{1, \ldots, r\\} \longrightarrow\\{1, \ldots, s\\}\) such that \(\mu_{i}=\sum_{\sigma(j)=i} \lambda_{j}\) for all \(i \leq s\). For example, \(\lambda=(4,2,1,1)\) is finer than \(\mu=(5,3)\), as furnished by \(\sigma(1)=\sigma(3)=1\) and \(\sigma(2)=\sigma(4)=2\). (The function \(\sigma\) need not be unique.) In particular, \((n)\) is the coarsest and \((1,1, \ldots, 1)\) is the finest partition of \(n\). (i) Prove that if \(f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) has degree \(n\) and \(p \in \mathbb{N}\) is prime, \(\mu\) is the factorization pattern of \(f\) in \(\mathbb{Q}[x]\), and \(\lambda\) is the factorization pattern of \(f \bmod p\) in \(\mathbb{F}_{p}[x]\), then \(\mu \succcurlyeq \lambda\). (ii) Show that \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \lambda, \lambda \preccurlyeq \mu \Longrightarrow \neg(\mu \preccurlyeq \lambda)\), and \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \mu \preccurlyeq \nu \Longrightarrow \lambda \preccurlyeq \nu\) holds for all partitions \(\lambda\), \(\mu, \nu\) of \(n\), so that \(\preccurlyeq\) is a partial order on the set of all partitions of \(n\). (iii) Enumerate all partitions of \(n=8\), and draw them in form of a directed graph, with an edge from \(\lambda\) to \(\mu\) if \(\mu\) is a direct successor of \(\lambda\) with respect to the order \(\preccurlyeq\), so that \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \mu, \lambda \neq \mu\), and \(\lambda \preccurlyeq \nu \preccurlyeq \mu \Longrightarrow \lambda=\nu\) or \(\nu=\mu\) for all partitions \(\nu\). (iv) Use (iii) to show that there exist partitions \(\lambda, \mu\) of 8 that do not have a supremum with respect to \(\preccurlyeq\). (Thus the partitions do not form a "lattice" in the sense of order theory, not to be confused with the \(\mathbb{Z}\)-module lattices in Chapter 16.) (v) Let \(a_{n, r}\) denote the number of partitions of \(n\) of length \(r\). Thus \(a_{n, 1}=a_{n, n}=1\) and \(a_{n, r}=0\) for \(1 \leq n

This exercise discusses a small primes modular algorithm for computing the squarefree decomposition of a primitive polynomial \(f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\). (i) Let \(R\) be a UFD and \(f \in R[x]\) nonconstant and primitive. Prove that there exist primitive squarefree and pairwise coprime polynomials \(g_{1}, \ldots, g_{m} \in R[x]\) such that \(g_{m}\) is nonconstant and \(f=g_{1} g_{2}^{2} \cdots g_{m}^{m}\). Show that \(m\) is unique and the \(g_{i}\) are unique up to multiplication by units in \(R^{\times}\). For the special cases \(R=\mathbb{Z}\) or \(R=F[y]\), where \(F\) is a field, we can make the decomposition above unique by stipulating that \(\operatorname{lc}\left(g_{i}\right) \in R\) be positive or monic, respectively, assuming that \(l c(f)\) is also positive or monic. Then we call the sequence \(\left(g_{1}, \ldots, g_{m}\right)\) the primitive squarefree decomposition of \(f\). (ii) Now let \(R=\mathbb{Z}, p\) be a prime not dividing \(\operatorname{lc}(f)\) and \(f \equiv \operatorname{lc}(f) h_{1} h_{2}^{2} \cdots h_{k}^{k}\) mod \(p\) be the squarefree decomposition of \(f\) modulo \(p\), with monic \(h_{1}, \ldots, h_{k} \in \mathbb{Z}[x]\) that are squarefree and pairwise coprime modulo \(p\), and \(h_{k} \neq 1\). Show that \(k \geq m\) and the modular squarefree part \(h_{1} \cdots h_{k}\) divides modulo \(p\) the squarefree part \(g=g_{1} \cdots g_{m}\) of \(f\). Prove that \(k=m\) and \(g_{i} \equiv \operatorname{lc}\left(g_{i}\right) h_{i}\) mod \(p\) for all \(i\) if \(p\) does not divide the (nonzero) discriminant res \(\left(g, g^{r}\right) \in \mathbb{Z}\) of \(g\). (iii) Prove the following generalization of Mignotte's bound (Corollary 6.33): If \(f, g_{1}, \ldots, g_{m} \in\) \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) are nonzero polynomials with \(f=g_{1} \cdots g_{m}\) and \(n=\operatorname{deg} f\), then $$ \prod_{1 \leq i \leq m}\left\|g_{i}\right\|_{1} \leq(n+1)^{1 / 2} 2^{n}\|f\|_{\infty} $$ (iv) Design a small primes modular algorithm for computing the primitive squarefree decomposition of \(f\), in analogy to the small primes modular ged algorithm \(6.38\). Your algorithm should check that the result is correct, so that it is Las Vegas, and use \(O^{\sim}\left(n^{2}+n \log A\right)\) word operations if \(A=\|f\|_{\infty}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free