Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{2}\) commute (i.e. \(\left.A_{1} A_{2}=A_{2} A_{1}\right)\), then \(e^{\left(A_{1}+A_{2}\right) t}=\) \(e^{A_{1} t} \cdot e^{A_{2} t} .\) Prove this. Give a counterexample to this equality if \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{2}\) do not commute.

Short Answer

Expert verified
If matrices commute, the exponential of their sum equals the product of exponentials. Non-commuting matrices provide a counterexample.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Matrix Exponentials

First, we need to understand what it means to take the exponential of a matrix. The exponential of a matrix \(A\), written as \(e^{At}\), is defined as the power series \( I + At + \frac{A^2 t^2}{2!} + \frac{A^3 t^3}{3!} + \ldots \). This is similar to the exponential function for real numbers but extended to matrices.
02

Apply Properties of Commuting Matrices

When two matrices commute, their order of multiplication does not matter, i.e., \(A_1 A_2 = A_2 A_1\). Due to this property, when expanding both \(e^{(A_{1}+A_{2})t}\) and \(e^{A_1 t} \cdot e^{A_2 t}\) as power series and multiplying powers, the terms will align correctly, showing \(e^{(A_1+A_2)t} = e^{A_1 t} \cdot e^{A_2 t}\).
03

Power Series Expansion of Each Exponential

Expand each exponential in its respective series form. For \( e^{(A_1 + A_2)t} \), it's \( I + (A_1 + A_2)t + \frac{(A_1 + A_2)^2 t^2}{2!} + \cdots \). For \( e^{A_1 t} \cdot e^{A_2 t} \), use \( (I + A_1 t + \frac{A_1^2 t^2}{2!} + \cdots)(I + A_2 t + \frac{A_2^2 t^2}{2!} + \cdots) \). The commutativity simplifies the expansion, showing they are equal.
04

Counterexample for Non-Commuting Matrices

Consider two 2x2 matrices that do not commute. Take \( A_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \) and \( A_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \). Calculate \( A_1 A_2 \) and \( A_2 A_1 \), showing they are not the same. Then, calculate the exponentials and show that \( e^{(A_1+A_2)t} eq e^{A_1 t} \cdot e^{A_2 t} \) due to the lack of commutativity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Commutative Matrices
Matrices are commutative when their multiplication is independent of the order, meaning if you take two matrices \(A_1\) and \(A_2\), they commute if \(A_1A_2 = A_2A_1\). This is a crucial property because it simplifies calculations in linear algebra. Commutative matrices enjoy some nice mathematical properties which can be useful in various applications like quantum mechanics and systems theory.

When matrices are commutative, you can break down some complex matrix operations into simpler steps. For example:
  • Combining their exponentials is possible. It becomes easy to prove that the combined exponential of two matrices \(e^{(A_1+A_2)t}\) equals the product of their individual exponentials \(e^{A_1t} \cdot e^{A_2t}\).
  • The commutative property helps align terms correctly when you use the power series method to calculate matrix exponentials.

This property is fundamental in understanding why, when matrices commute, we can treat the exponential operations nearly as comfortably as we do with numbers.
Power Series Expansion
A significant technique in mathematics is the use of power series expansions. This is especially useful when extending functions from the realm of real numbers to matrices. The matrix exponential \(e^{At}\) is defined with a power series, similar to how we calculate the exponential for scalar values.

The power series allows us to write \(e^{At}\) as \[I + At + \frac{A^2 t^2}{2!} + \frac{A^3 t^3}{3!} + \cdots.\]Here, \(I\) is the identity matrix. Each term in the series becomes progressively smaller for small \(t\), mimicking the exponential growth with matrices.

This method breaks down complex matrix operations into manageable algebraic tasks:
  • When matrices commute, substituting in their expansions shows clear alignment.
  • This alignment makes it possible to combine separate matrices into one, proving equations like \(e^{(A_1+A_2)t} = e^{A_1t} \cdot e^{A_2t}\) for commuting matrices.

The power series offers a bridge between simple algebra and complex matrix dynamics.
Non-Commuting Matrices
When matrices do not commute, all bets are off in terms of certain simplifications. Non-commuting matrices mean reorder them and you get a different product, \(A_1A_2 eq A_2A_1\). This complicates many operations in linear algebra, especially when dealing with matrix exponentials.

For non-commuting matrices:
  • You cannot simply separate products of their exponentials like \(e^{(A_1+A_2)t} eq e^{A_1t} \cdot e^{A_2t}\).
  • Calculations require careful treatment of each matrix’s interaction with one another.

A simple example with 2x2 matrices can demonstrate this. Consider:
\[A_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \quad A_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.\]Here, \(A_1A_2\) is not the same as \(A_2A_1\). Calculating their exponentials separately, then trying to multiply them, will not yield the same result as calculating \(e^{(A_1+A_2)t}\) directly. This illustrates how sensitive matrix operations can be when commutativity isn’t present, demonstrating why each matrix's behavior must be individually considered in non-commuting scenarios.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We are given the \(n\)-th order system \(\dot{x}=A x\) with $$ A=\left(\begin{array}{ccccc} 0 & 1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ \vdots & \ddots & \ddots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \vdots & & \ddots & \ddots & 0 \\ 0 & \cdots & \cdots & 0 & 1 \\ -a_{0} & -a_{1} & \cdots & -a_{n-2} & -a_{n-1} \end{array}\right) $$ Show that the chanacteristic polynomial of \(A\) is $$ \lambda^{n}+a_{n-1} \lambda^{n-1}+\ldots+a_{1} \lambda+a_{0} $$ If \(\lambda\) is an eigenvalue of \(A\), then prove that the corresponding eigenvector is $$ \left(1, \lambda, \lambda^{2}, \ldots, \lambda^{n-1}\right)^{T} $$

This is a continuation of Subsection 2.4.2. Consider a satellite of unit mass in earth orbit specified by its position and velocity in polar coordinates \(r, \dot{r}, \theta, \dot{\theta} .\) The input functions are a radial thrust \(u_{1}(t)\) and a tangential thrust of \(u_{2}(t) .\) Newton's laws yield $$ \vec{r}=r \dot{\theta}^{2}-\frac{g}{r^{2}}+u_{1} ; \quad \ddot{\theta}=-\frac{2 \dot{\theta} \dot{r}}{r}+\frac{1}{r} u_{2} . $$ (Compare (2.6) and take \(m_{\mathrm{s}}=1\) and rewrite \(G m_{\mathrm{e}}\) as \(g .\) ) Show that, if \(u_{1}(t)=\) \(u_{2}(t)=0, r(t)=\sigma\) (constant), \(\theta(t)=\omega t\) ( \(\omega\) is constant) with \(\sigma^{3} \omega^{2}=g\) is a solution and that linearization around this solution leads to (with \(x_{1}=r(t)-\) \(\left.\sigma ; x_{2}=\dot{r} ; x_{3}=\sigma(\theta-\omega t) ; x_{4}=\sigma(\dot{\theta}-\omega)\right)\) $$ \frac{d x}{d t}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 3 \omega^{2} & 0 & 0 & 2 \omega \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & -2 \omega & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right) x+\left(\begin{array}{ll} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right) u $$

Given the differential equations $$ \begin{aligned} &\dot{x}_{1}(t)=x_{2}(t) \\ &\dot{x}_{2}(t)=-x_{1}(t)-x_{2}^{2}(t)+u(t) \end{aligned} $$ and the output function \(y(t)=x_{1}(t)\). Show that for \(u(t)=\cos ^{2}(t)\) a solution of the differential equations is \(x_{1}=\sin t, x_{2}=\cos t\). Linearize the state equations and the output function around this solution and write the result in matrix form. Is the linearized system time-invariant?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free