Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Perform a selection sort on the list 7, 4, 2, 9, 6. Show the list after each exchange that has an effect on the list orclering.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The list is sorted in ascending order as [2, 4, 6, 7, 9].

Step by step solution

01

Initial List Analysis

Begin by examining the initial list: [7, 4, 2, 9, 6]. Identify the smallest element in the list to determine its position after the first pass.
02

Find and Swap the Minimum Element – Pass 1

In the first pass, locate the smallest element, which is 2, and swap it with the first element of the list, 7. After the swap, the list becomes: [2, 4, 7, 9, 6].
03

List Re-evaluation After Pass 1

Analyze the list after the first pass: [2, 4, 7, 9, 6]. The first element is now in its sorted position. Continue with the next unsorted portion of the list, starting from index 1.
04

Find and Swap the Minimum Element – Pass 2

In the second pass, inspect elements from index 1 to the end. The smallest element in this range is 4, which is already in the correct position. No swap needed. The list remains: [2, 4, 7, 9, 6].
05

List Re-evaluation After Pass 2

After the second pass, the list is still [2, 4, 7, 9, 6]. Continue to the next pass, starting at index 2.
06

Find and Swap the Minimum Element – Pass 3

For the third pass, review elements starting from index 2. The smallest element is 6, which should be swapped with the element at index 2 (currently 7). Perform the swap resulting in: [2, 4, 6, 9, 7].
07

List Re-evaluation After Pass 3

After completing the third pass, the list becomes [2, 4, 6, 9, 7]. Proceed to the fourth pass at index 3.
08

Find and Swap the Minimum Element – Pass 4

In the fourth pass, check the elements at index 3 and 4. The smallest element is 7, which swaps with the element at index 3 (9). Post-swap, the list is [2, 4, 6, 7, 9].
09

Final Confirmation and List Validation

After completing all necessary swaps, confirm the final sorted order: [2, 4, 6, 7, 9]. The list is now in ascending order.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sorting Algorithms
Sorting algorithms are fundamental to computer science, being essential strategies used to arrange data in a particular order. These algorithms are applied to organize data, making information retrieval more efficient. Imagine you have a stack of unsorted cards that you want to arrange in a particular sequence, such as numerical or alphabetical order. Selection Sort, a common sorting algorithm, is one such method used for this task.

Selection Sort operates by segmenting the list into a sorted and an unsorted part. It then continuously finds the smallest element from the unsorted section and moves it to the end of the sorted section until the entire list is sorted. While this method can be straightforward to understand, it is not always the most efficient in terms of time complexity, especially for large datasets. Despite this, it remains a popular educational tool to illustrate basic sorting concepts due to its simplicity and ease of implementation.
Algorithm Steps
Selection Sort follows a structured approach to sorting, involving a series of repeatable steps that lead to a sorted list. Understanding these steps is crucial in comprehending how the algorithm systematically orders elements.

  • Initial State: Start with the entire list to be sorted. For example, consider [7, 4, 2, 9, 6].
  • Finding the Minimum: Traverse the unsorted section of the list to find the smallest element.
  • Swapping: Swap this smallest element with the first unsorted element, effectively moving it into its correct position in the sorted section.
  • Repeat: Continue the sorting process for the remaining unsorted elements until no elements remain outside of the sorted section.

At the end of these steps, the list becomes fully ordered. Selection Sort's step-by-step methodology reinforces key computational concepts, improving one's ability to implement similar logic in more complex scenarios.
Computer Science Education
Computer Science Education often begins with fundamental principles like sorting algorithms due to their pivotal role in learning programming and data organization. Teaching Selection Sort in early computer science courses provides students with tangible experience in algorithmic thinking and problem-solving.

By learning how this algorithm works, students can better understand the importance of efficiency, as Selection Sort is a perfect example of a simple algorithm that, while easy to implement, might not be suitable for all applications due to its higher computational cost in comparison to other sorting methods like Quick Sort or Merge Sort.

Moreover, breaking down an algorithm into clearly defined steps, as seen in Selection Sort, helps students develop their capabilities in logically structuring solutions, creating a foundation for more advanced study in fields such as data structures and algorithm optimization. This process encourages a strong grasp of how algorithms operate on a fundamental level, making it a crucial component of computer science education.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The American Museum of Natural History in New York City contains more than 32 million specimens and artifacts in its warious collections, including the world's langest collection of dinosaur fossils. Many of these are in storage away from public view, but all must be carefully inventoried. a. Suppose the inventory is unordered (I) and a sequential search is done to locate a specific artifact. Given that the search is executed on a computer that can clo 12,000 comparisons per second, about how much time on the aNerage would the search require? b. Assuming the inventory is sorted, about how much time would a binary search require?

If a list is already sorted in ascending order, a modified sequential search algorithm can be used that compares against each element in turn, stopping if a list element exceeds the target value. Write a pseudocode version of this short sequential search algorithm.

A tennis tournarnsnt has 342 players. A singlo match imolves 2 players. The winner of a match will play the winner of a match in the next round, wheress losers are eliminated from the toumament. The 2 players who have won all previous rounds play in the final game, and the wirner wins the tournament. What is the total number of matches needed to determine the winner? a. Here is one algorithm to answer this question. Compute \(342 / 2=171\) to get the number of pairs (matches) in the first round, which results in 171 winners to go on to the second round. Compute \(171 / 2=85\) with 1 left over, which results in 85 matches in the second round and 85 winners, plus the 1 left over, to go on to the third round. For the third round compute \(86 / 2=43,50\) the third round has 43 matches, and so on. The total number of matches is \(171+85+43+\ldots\) Finish this process to find the total number of matches. b. Here is another algorithm to solve this problem, Each match results in exactly one loser, so there must be the same number of matches as losers in the tournament. Compute the total number of losers in the entire tournament. (Hint: This isf't really a computation; it is a one-sentence argument.) c. What is your opinion on the relative clarity, elegance, and efficiency of the two algorithms?

In the Flipping Pancakes box, the original algorithm given requires at most \(2 n-3\) flips in the worst case. The claim is made that the new algorithm, which requires at most \(15 n+5] / 3\) flipa, is a better algorithm. How many pancalces do you need to hawe betore the second algorithm is indeed faster? Use a calculator or spreadsheet.]

Write the data list that results from running the shuffle-left algorithm to clean up the following data. Find the exact number of copies done. \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline 3 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 6 & 7 & 0 & 0 & 5 & 1 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free