Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Ant colonies are an example from nature of swarm intelligence. Find two other examples of swarm intelligence seen in nature.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Examples include flocks of birds and schools of fish.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Swarm Intelligence

Swarm intelligence involves the collective behavior of decentralized, self-organized systems. The primary characteristic is that individuals work together without central control, often leading to complex behaviors emerging from simple rules.
02

Identifying Characteristics of Swarm Intelligence

In nature, swarm intelligence can be found in entities that showcase coordination among group members, division of labor, and collective problem-solving. Look for these characteristics in the animal kingdom to find groups that exhibit swarm intelligence beyond ants.
03

Example 1 - Flocks of Birds

Flocks of birds, such as starlings during murmuration, exhibit swarm intelligence. Each bird follows simple rules related to distance and direction with its neighbors, yet collectively, they form complex, coordinated patterns and movements without a single leader.
04

Example 2 - Schools of Fish

Schools of fish, like sardines, demonstrate swarm intelligence by swimming in synchronized groups. Just like birds in a flock, each fish responds to its immediate neighbors by holding a position and direction, which results in the whole school moving as a single, harmonious unit.
05

Summarizing Key Examples

To summarize, we identified two examples of swarm intelligence: flocks of birds and schools of fish. Both demonstrate collective organization and behavior arising from local interactions between the individuals in the group.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Decentralized Systems in Nature
In nature, many systems operate without a central governing authority, embodying what we call decentralized systems. A decentralized system consists of multiple agents operating independently, yet their combined efforts result in intricate, cohesive outcomes.
An excellent example of a decentralized system is a bee colony. Here, no single bee dictates the activities of the swarm. Instead, individual bees follow simple rules and respond to local stimuli, leading to the construction of complex hive structures and efficient resource gathering.
  • Decentralized systems rely on local decision-making.
  • They often display robustness and adaptability in changing environments.
  • Power is distributed equally among all the elements.
These systems thrive despite the absence of a central leader and can adapt rapidly to new conditions, showcasing the elegance of natural processes.
Collective Behavior and Swarm Intelligence
Swarm intelligence is the emergent property of collective behavior observed in groups of individual agents. When these agents interact by following simple set rules, they accomplish tasks that seem beyond the capabilities of any single individual.
For instance, let’s look at termites, which build remarkably complex mounds. Each termite operates based on local cues and performs specific roles, yet together, their actions result in these large, sophisticated structures.
  • Collective behaviors enable impressive feats like complex structure building.
  • Each agent’s behavior is influenced by its peers and its environment.
  • Such systems demonstrate efficiency and resourcefulness.
Understanding collective behavior in such systems provides valuable insights into problem-solving and coordination without centralized command.
Animal Coordination and Communication
Animal coordination in nature often involves communication among individuals to achieve group objectives. Birds, fish, and other animals use signals to maintain cohesion and direction within the group.
Consider the example of honeybees performing a waggle dance. This communication method informs other bees about the location of nectar sources. Each bee observes this dance and adjusts their flight path accordingly.
  • Communication is key for synchronizing the actions of group members.
  • Coordinated movements enhance survival and resource acquisition.
  • Techniques like signaling ensure that group members are aligned in their goals.
Such coordination showcases animal ingenuity in navigating and manipulating their environments to optimize outcomes for the entire group.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A rule-based system for writing the screenplays for mystery movies contains the following assertions and rules: The hero is a spy. The heroine is an interpreter. If the hero is a spy, then one scene should take place in Berlin and one in Paris. If the heroine is an interpreter, then the heroine must speak English. If the heroine is an interpreter, then the heroine must speak Russian. If one scene should take place in Berlin, then there can be no car chase. If there can be no car chase, then there can be no crash scene. If one scene should take place in Berlin, then the hero is European. If one scene should take place in Paris, then the hero must speak French. an the following assertion be inferred? Explain. The hero must speak French and there can be no crash scene.

We described both forward chaining and backward chaining as techniques used by inference engines in rule-based systems. In Section 11.2.2, we described how a parser might analyze a programming statement to produce a parse tree. Does the method described in Chapter 11 correspond more closely to forward chaining or to backward chaining? Explain.

Assign weights and threshold values in the following neural network so that the output neuron fires only when \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{3}\) have the value 1 and \(x_{2}\), has the value 0 . Remember that weights can be negative.

a. Write a Winograd schema and the challenge question. Also give the correct answer. (See the Special Interest Box "Victory in the Turing Test?" earlier in this chapter.) b. Now change one word in your sentence from Exercise 1 a so that the correct answer is different.

Suppose that in a formal logic, green \((x)\) means that \(x\) has the attribute of being green, \(\operatorname{frog}(x)\) means that \(x\) has the attribute of being a bullfrog, and \(J\) stands for the specific entity Jeremiah. Translate the following formal statements into English: a. \(\operatorname{frog}(J)\) b. \((\forall x)(\) frog \((x) \rightarrow \operatorname{green}(x))\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free