Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

  1. Show that ifis a DFA that recognizes languageB, swapping the accept and non accept states inyields a new DFA recognizing the complement ofB. Conclude that the class of regular languages is closed under complement.
  2. Show by giving an example that ifM is an NFA that recognizes language C swapping the accept and non accept states in Mdoesn’t necessarily yield a new NFA that recognizes the complement of C. Is the class of languages recognized by NFAs closed under complement? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

In solution (a),whole complement class of regular languages is complete.

In solution (b), NFAs identify a class of languages that is closed under complement.

Step by step solution

01

Explain DFA.

DFA , is the Deterministic Finite Automata, that has the finite state that can be reached on transition. The deterministic finite automata , has the knowledge about the state that will be reached.

02

Step 2:Show that if M is a DFA that recognizes language B .

(a)

is a DFA that recognizes' B language.Let M be just the updated DFA, with accept as well as non-accept states exchanged in M .Assume M takes an integer x as input. Run M'upon x, M'will almost certainly attain its acceptable state.Both accept but also non-accept statuses of both the computers M and M'have already been switched.

If runs on x, M rejects, reject. If M'acceptsx ,M rejectsx . If M accepts X, M'doesn't at all acceptx .If, x.B=Bthen xBequals complements of B as well as vice versa.

As a result,M' would allow strings something M does not accept.As a result,M' identifies languages that are complements to .Because M recognises an appropriate language B, M'recognisesB 's complementing, which would be likewise normal; hence, whole complement class of regular languages is complete.

Therefore, The class of regular languages is closed under complement.

03

Is the class of languages recognized by NFAs closed under complement? Explain your answer.

(b)

Assumeis an NFA which understands the languageC.

M’sstate diagramis as follows,

To get accompanying M'if simply switch the approve with non allow states of M.

Consider that class of languages recognised by NFAs is exactly the same as the class recognised by DFAs.

Therefore, yes class of languages recognized by NFAs closed under complement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A homomorphism is a function f:Σ-Γ*from one alphabet to strings over another alphabet. We can extend f to operate on strings by defining:f(w)=f(w1)f(w2)···f(wn),wherew=w1w2···wnandeachwiΣ.

We further extend fto operate on languages by defining f(A)={f(w)|wA},for any language A.

a. Show, by giving a formal construction, that the class of regular languages is closed under homomorphism. In other words, given a DFA Mthat recognizes Band a homomorphism f, construct a finite automaton role="math" localid="1660800566802" M0that recognizes f(B).Consider the machine role="math" localid="1660800575641" M0that you constructed. Is it a DFA in every case?

b. Show, by giving an example, that the class of non-regular languages is not closed under homomorphism.

Let the rotational closure of language A be.

RC(A)={yx|xyA}

a. Show that for any language A, we have RC(A)=RC(RC(A)).

b. Show that the class of regular languages is closed under rotational closure.

Let Cn={x|xis a binary number that is a multiple of n}. Show that for each n1, the language Cnis regular

The construction in Theorem 1.54 shows that every GNFA is equivalent to a GNFA with only two states. We can show that an opposite phenomenon occurs for DFAs. Prove that for every k>1, a language xAk{0,1}exists that is recognized by a DFA with k states but not by one with onlyk-1 states

For languages AandB, let the shuffle of AandBbe the language

{ω|ω=a1b1...akbk,where  a1...akA  and  b1...bkB,each  ai,bi}.

Show that the class of regular languages is closed under shuffle.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free