Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Read the informal definition of the finite state transducer given in Exercise 1.24. Give a formal definition of this model, following the pattern in Definition 1.5 (page 35). Assume that an FST has an input alphabet and an output alphabet but not a set of accept states. Include a formal definition of the computation of an FST.

(Hint: An FST is a 5-tuple. Its transition function is of the formδ:QxQxT

Short Answer

Expert verified

The transition is δ(qi+1',wi+1)=(qi+1',xi+1)for0i<n

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Finite State Transducer:

• A deterministic finite transducer is indeed a deterministic finite state automata that includes either an inputs as well as an output sequence..

• It turns every input file to something like a string output..

02

Explanation

The following seems to be the precise definition of a State Machine Transducer (FST):

A Finite State Transducer (FST) is a 6-tuple machine with the following representation:M=Q,,r,δ,q0where

• Q is a finite set of states.

is a finite set of input alphabets.

• r is a finite set of output alphabets.

δ:QxQxTis the transition function that defines rules.

q0Q, is the start state.

The proper definition for Finite State Transducer (FST) computing seems to be as follows:

•This finite state machine gets computed by converting the input stream into an output string.

• Suppose w is really a string that spans the source alphabet. where x is very much an output string made out of the letters of the alphabet r .

• This changeover takes place in a series of states. q0,q1,q2,...qninQ such that q0=q0

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the results of Exercise 2.16to give another proof that every regular language is context- free, by showing how to convert a regular expression directly to an equivalent context-free grammar.

Use the construction given in Theorem 1.39 to convert the following two nondeterministic finite automata to equivalent deterministic finite automata.

Use the procedure described in Lemma 1.60to convert the following finite automata to regular expressions.

LetΣ={a,b} . For each k1, let Ckbe the language consisting of all strings that contain an a exactly K places from the right-hand end.

ThusCk=Σ*k-1 . Describe an NFA with k+1states that recognizes Ckin terms of both a state diagram and a formal description.

Question:Consider the algorithm MINIMIZE, which takes a DFA as input and outputs DFA .

MINIMIZE = “On input , where M=(Q,Σ,δ,q0,A) is a DFA:

1.Remove all states of G that are unreachable from the start state.

2. Construct the following undirected graph G whose nodes are the states of .

3. Place an edge in G connecting every accept state with every non accept state. Add additional edges as follows.

4. Repeat until no new edges are added to G :

5. For every pair of distinct states q and r of and every aΣ :

6. Add the edge (q,r) to G if δq,a,δr,a is an edge of G .

7. For each state q,let[q] be the collection of statesq={rQ|noedge joins q and r in G }.

8.Form a new DFA M'=Q',Σ,δ',q'0,A'where

Q'={[q]|qQ}(ifq=r,onlyoneofthemisinQ'),δ'(q,a)=[δq,a]foreveryqQandaΣ,q00=[q0],andA0={[q]|qA}

9. Output ( M')”

a. Show that M and M' are equivalent.

b. Show that M0 is minimal—that is, no DFA with fewer states recognizes the same language. You may use the result of Problem 1.52 without proof.

c. Show that MINIMIZE operates in polynomial time.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free