Chapter 2: 11E (page 155)
Convert the CFG given in Exercise 2.1 to an equivalent PDA, using the procedure given in Theorem 2.20
Short Answer
The equivalent PDA is as follows:
Chapter 2: 11E (page 155)
Convert the CFG given in Exercise 2.1 to an equivalent PDA, using the procedure given in Theorem 2.20
The equivalent PDA is as follows:
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeSay that a language is prefix-closed if all prefixes of every string in the language are also in the language. Let C be an infinite, prefix-closed, context-free language. Show that C contains an infinite regular subset.
For string W and t , write if the symbols of W are a permutation of the symbols of t . In other word, if t and W have the same symbols in the same quantities, but possibly in a different order.
For any string W , defines . For any language A, let .
For any language, let SUFFIX() = Show that the class of context-free languages is closed under the SUFFIX operation
Let C=. Prove that C is not a DCFL. (Hint: Suppose that when some DPDA P is started in state q with symbol x on the top of its stack, P never pops its stack below x, no matter what input string P reads from that point on. In that case, the contents of P’s stack at that point cannot affect its subsequent behaviour, so P’s subsequent behavior can depend only on q and x).
We defined the CUT of language to be Show that the class of CFLs is not closed under CUT.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.