Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that if \\[ W(n) \leq \frac{(p-1)(p-2)}{2}+\frac{(n-p)(n-p-1)}{2} \\] then \\[ W(n) \leq \frac{n(n-1)}{2} \quad \text { for } \quad 1 \leq p \leq n \\] This result is used in the discussion of the worst-case time complexity analysis of Algorithm 2.6 (Quicksort).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The proof shows that if the original inequality \(W(n) \leq \frac{(p-1)(p-2)}{2}+\frac{(n-p)(n-p-1)}{2}\) holds true, then it will lead to \(W(n) \leq \frac{n(n-1)}{2}\), thereby verifying that \(W(n) \leq \frac{n(n-1)}{2}\) for \(1 \leq p \leq n\).

Step by step solution

01

Expand terms on the right side

First, expand the terms on the right side of the given inequality: \( \frac{(p-1)(p-2)}{2}+\frac{(n-p)(n-p-1)}{2} \), giving \( \frac{p^2-3p+2}{2}+\frac{n^2-2np+p^2-p}{2} \).
02

Simplify the equation

Simplify the equation by combining like terms, which yields: \( \frac{2p^2-3p+n^2-2np+2-p}{2} = \frac{2p^2-3p+n^2-2np+2-p}{2} = \frac{n^2-p^2+1}{2} \).
03

Substitute \(p=n/2\)

Replace p in the inequality with \(n/2\), which gives the right side as \( \frac{n^2 - (n/2)^2 + 1}{2} = \frac{n^2 - n^2/4 + 1}{2}\). When simplified, it gives \( W(n) \leq \frac{3n^2/4 + 1}{2} \).
04

Prove the required inequality

We can see that \( \frac{3n^2/4 + 1}{2} \leq \frac{n(n-1)}{2} \) because as \(n \geq 1\), \( \frac{3n^2}{4} + 1 \leq n^2 - n = n(n - 1) \). And both sides are divisible by 2, so the division by 2 will not affect the inequality. This proves that \(W(n) \leq \frac{n(n-1)}{2}\) if \(W(n) \leq \frac{3n^2/4 + 1}{2}\), thereby fulfilling the required condition.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Worst-case Time Complexity
In algorithm design, worst-case time complexity refers to the maximum amount of time an algorithm can take to complete its task, considering the worst possible scenario. When analyzing quicksort, worst-case scenarios arise mainly due to poor pivot selection, which can lead to unbalanced partitions. For instance, if the smallest or largest element is always chosen as the pivot, quicksort's performance degrades, resulting in a time complexity of \( O(n^2) \).
This is why analyzing conditions under which quicksort can handle the data efficiently is crucial. In practical applications, techniques like randomization of pivot selection and tailored partitioning methods help alleviate these worst-case scenarios. Such careful consideration ensures the algorithm performs well across different inputs, aiding in efficient data handling.
Inequality Proofs in Algorithm Analysis
Inequality proofs are vital in algorithm analysis to establish boundaries or limits an algorithm's performance might encounter. In terms of quicksort, the inequality:
  • \( W(n) \leq \frac{(p-1)(p-2)}{2} + \frac{(n-p)(n-p-1)}{2} \)
helps us derive conditions that inform us about partition effectiveness. By expanding and simplifying this inequality, we can see how it aligns with one of quicksort's fundamental expectations:
  • \( W(n) \leq \frac{n(n-1)}{2} \)
Essentially, proving such inequalities serves to reassure that the algorithm won't exceed a certain threshold of operations in any configuration of input. This form of analysis aids in reinforcing the stability and predictability of an algorithm's performance.
Delving into Algorithm Analysis
Algorithm analysis involves studying the efficiency and resource use of algorithms, in terms of time (speed) and space (memory). When analyzing the quicksort algorithm, different cases—best, average, and worst—are evaluated to understand its behavior on various types of data.
During the worst-case analysis, as seen in the problem, techniques such as setting bounds using inequalities and mathematical expansions are deployed to predict the maximum operations an algorithm will perform.
Understanding these components provides a detailed roadmap for optimizing algorithms, predicting their behavior, and implementing effective modifications to mitigate inefficiencies in special cases.
Concept of Mathematical Expansion
Mathematical expansion is a technique used to rewrite expressions in a more simplified or exploitable form. It is employed in various fields such as physics, engineering, and computer science. In the context of algorithm analysis, mathematical expansion helps break down complex terms into simpler constituents.
  • The expression \( \frac{(p-1)(p-2)}{2} + \frac{(n-p)(n-p-1)}{2} \) was expanded to \( \frac{n^2 - p^2 + 1}{2} \), which aids in comparing it against other important inequalities.
This step-by-step approach ensures that nuanced mathematical insights reveal essential details, allowing a deeper understanding of algorithm behavior under various input conditions. Ultimately, such expansions are tools that transform obscure equations into clear inequalities that guide the analysis and development of algorithms.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Given the recurrence relation \\[ \begin{array}{l} T(n)=7 T\left(\frac{n}{5}\right)+10 n \quad \text { for } n>1 \\ T(1)=1 \end{array} \\] find \(T(625)\)

Suppose that there are \(n=2^{k}\) teams in an elimination tournament, where there are \(n / 2\) games in the first round, with the \(n / 2=2^{2-1}\) winners playing in the second round, and so on. (a) Develop a recurrence equation for the number of rounds in the tournament. (b) How many rounds are there in the tournament when there are 64 teams? (c) Solve the recurrence cquation of part (a).

Write an efficient algorithm that searches for a value in an \(n \times m\) table (twodimensional array). This table is sorted along the rows and columns - that is \\[ \begin{array}{l} \text { Table }(i][j] \leq T a b l c[i][j+1] \\ \text { Table }[i][j] \leq T a b l e[i+1][j] \end{array} \\]

Use Binary Search (Algorithm 2.1 ) to search for the integer 120 in the following list (array) of integers. Show the actions step by step. $$\begin{array}{lllllllll} 12 & 34 & 37 & 45 & 57 & 82 & 99 & 120 & 134 \end{array}$$

Consider procedure solve \((P, I, O)\) given below. This algorithm solves problem \(P\) by finding the output (solution) \(O\) corresponding to any input \(l\) Assume \(g(n)\) basic operations for partitioning and combining and no basic operations for an instance of size 1 (a) Write a recurrence equation \(T(n)\) for the number of basic operations needed to solve \(P\) when the input size is \(n\) (b) What is the solution to this recurrence equation if \(g(n) \in \Theta(n)\) (proof not required \() ?\) (c) Assuming that \(g(n)=n^{2},\) solve the recurrence equation exactly for \(n=\) 27 (d) Find the general solution for \(n\) a power of 3

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free