Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Find a big \(O\) upper bound (the best you know how to get) on solutions to the recurrence \(T(n)=T(n / 4)+T(n / 2)+n^{2}\), with \(T(n)=1\) if \(n<4 .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The best big \( O \) upper bound for the recurrence is \( O(n^2) \).

Step by step solution

01

Determine Recurrence Structure

The recurrence relation given is \( T(n) = T(n/4) + T(n/2) + n^2 \) with the base case \( T(n) = 1 \) for \( n < 4 \). This means for any problem of size \( n \), it splits into two sub-problems of sizes \( n/4 \) and \( n/2 \) and performs \( n^2 \) additional work.
02

Identify Recurrence Type

This recurrence does not fit the standard forms for binary or balanced recurrences like the Master Theorem due to the differing denominators (4 and 2). The Master Theorem applies in cases where the subproblems are equally divided. Therefore, alternative approaches such as making substitutions or the recursion tree method are needed.
03

Use Recursion Tree Method

Construct a recursion tree for the recurrence to identify the total work done. The root's cost is \( n^2 \), and splits into two children each costing \((n/4)^2\) and \((n/2)^2\). This process will continue until the subproblems reach base case size \( n < 4 \).
04

Analyze Each Level of the Tree

At each level of the tree, calculate the total cost:- Level 0: \( n^2 \)- Level 1: \( (n/4)^2 + (n/2)^2 = n^2 / 16 + n^2 / 4 = 5n^2/16 \)- Level 2: Each subproblem further breaks into new subproblems calculated similarly. Sum their work.The general pattern for each level can be observed as a geometric series.
05

Aggregate Total Work

The total work is given by the sum of work at every level of the tree. The sum of the geometric series can be approximated by:\[ T(n) = \sum_{i=0}^{\log_4 n} a^i k \quad \text{where} \quad a = \frac{5}{16} \text{and} \quad k = n^2 \]As \( a < 1 \), apply the geometric series sum formula.\[ T(n) = n^2 \cdot \frac{1-(5/16)^{\log_4 n}}{1-5/16} \approx O(n^2) \] when simplifying.
06

Simplification and Conclusion

The dominant term in the geometric sum results from the root cost, which indicates that the total work done per division and conquering is bounded by \( O(n^2) \). Therefore, the observational bound of our recursion tree's summation is \( O(n^2) \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Recurrence Relations
Recurrence relations are equations or inequalities that describe a function in terms of its value at smaller inputs. They are frequently used to characterize the running time of recursive algorithms. If an algorithm divides a problem into smaller subproblems, solves them recursively, and then combines their solutions, recurrence relations are often used to model its time complexity. In the given exercise, the recurrence relation given is:\[ T(n) = T(n/4) + T(n/2) + n^2 \]with the base condition:\[ T(n) = 1 \quad \text{for} \quad n < 4 \]This equation indicates that for an input size of \( n \), the algorithm splits into two problems of sizes \( n/4 \) and \( n/2 \), and performs an additional \( n^2 \) amount of work.When approaching such problems, the recurrence relation helps in breaking down the total work done into recognizable patterns, which can then be solved using various methods like the recursion tree method or the substitution method.
Recursion Tree Method
The recursion tree method is a visual tool used to estimate the time complexity of a recurrence relation by drawing a tree. Each node of the tree represents a recursive call and its associated cost, providing valuable insight into how the recursive process unfolds.A recursion tree starts with the initial problem at the root node. For our recurrence \[ T(n) = T(n/4) + T(n/2) + n^2 \]the root has a cost of \( n^2 \). This splits into two children nodes with costs \( (n/4)^2 \) and \( (n/2)^2 \), representing the subproblems' costs. Subsequent levels of the tree represent further subdivisions until the base condition \( n < 4 \) is met.As we add up the costs at each level of the tree, we notice a repeated pattern. These patterns often reveal themselves as geometric series, which are easier to sum. An essential concept is that the total work of the tree is dictated by the sum of work at all levels, often dominated by the level with the most significant contributions. In this exercise, simplifying the series showed that the dominant work translates to an \( O(n^2) \) complexity, suggesting the bulk of work occurs near the root node.
Big O Notation
Big O notation is a mathematical concept used to describe the upper bound of an algorithm's running time. It characterizes how the runtime grows with input size, focusing on the term that increases most rapidly as \( n \), the number of elements, becomes very large.In the provided exercise, the goal was to determine the Big O upper bound for the recurrence relation:\[ T(n) = T(n/4) + T(n/2) + n^2 \]After evaluating the recurrence using the recursion tree method, it was found that each level's cumulative work follows a geometric series. This insight leads us to \[ T(n) \approx O(n^2) \],which means that the highest order of growth for this algorithm is \( n^2 \).Big O notation allows us to strip away lower-order terms and constant factors, highlighting the most significant term that affects an algorithm's efficiency in terms of time. This makes it instrumental in analyzing algorithms, helping developers understand the efficiency and scalability of their code.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Our arguments in favor of the sum principle were quite intuitive. In fact, the sum principle for \(n\) sets follows from the sum principle for two sets. Use induction to prove the sum principle for a union of \(n\) sets from the sum principle for a union of two sets.

Find the error in the following "proof" that all positive integers \(n\) are equal: Let \(p(n)\) be the statement that all numbers in an \(n\)-element set of positive integers are equal. Then \(p(1)\) is true. Now assume \(p(n-1)\) is true, and let \(N\) be the set of the first \(n\) integers. Let \(N^{\prime}\) be the set of the first \(n-1\) integers, and let \(N^{\prime \prime}\) be the set of the last \(n-1\) integers. By \(p(n-1)\), all members of \(N^{\prime}\) are equal, and all members of \(N^{\prime \prime}\) are equal. Thus, the first \(n-1\) elements of \(N\) are equal and the last \(n-1\) elements of \(N\) are equal, and so all elements of \(N\) are equal. Therefore, all positive integers are equal.

This problem explores ways to prove that $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{n}}=1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^{n} $$ for all positive integers \(n\). a. First, we explore how to prove the formula by contradiction. In other words, assume that there is some integer \(n\) that makes the formula false. In this case, there must be some smallest \(n\) that makes the formula false. i. Can this smallest \(n\) be \(1 ?\) ii. What do you know about $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{i}} $$ when \(i\) is a positive integer smaller than this smallest \(n\) ? iii. Is \(n-1\) a positive integer for this smallest \(n\) ? iv. What do you know about $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{n-1}} $$ for this smallest \(n\) ? v. Write the answer to part iv as an equation, add \(2 / 3^{n}\) to both sides, and simplify the right side. vi. What does the equation that results from part \(\mathrm{v}\) say about your assumption that the formula is false? vii. What can you conclude about the truth of the formula? viii. If \(p(k)\) is the statement $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{k}}=1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^{k} $$ what implication did you prove in the process of deriving your contradiction? b. i. What is the base case in a proof by mathematical induction that $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{n}}=1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^{n} $$ for all positive integers \(n\) ? ii. What would you assume as an inductive hypothesis? iii. What would you prove in the inductive step of a proof of this formula by induction? iv. Prove it. v. What does the principle of mathematical induction allow you to conclude? vi. If \(p(k)\) is the statement $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{k}}=1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^{k} $$ what implication did you prove in the process of doing your proof by induction?

Show that \(\log _{b} n=\Theta\left(\log _{2} n\right)\) for any constant \(b>1\).

Prove Corollary \(4.8\) by showing that for any \(x, y\), and \(z\), each greater than \(1, x^{\log _{y} z}=z^{\log _{y} x}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free