Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Prove by induction that if \(T(n) \leq 4 T(n / 2)+n^{2}\), then \(T(n)=O\left(n^{2} \log n\right)\) (assuming \(n\) is a power of 2 ).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The recurrence relation resolves to \(T(n) = O(n^{2} \log n)\) by induction, verifying the hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to show that the recursive inequality \(T(n) \leq 4 T(n / 2)+n^{2}\) leads to the conclusion that \(T(n)=O(n^{2} \log n)\). This means we will demonstrate that the asymptotic behavior of \(T(n)\) is bounded above by a function \(Cn^{2} \log n\) for some constant \(C\).
02

Base Case Verification

For induction, we first check the base case. Typically, for \(T(n)\) where \(n=1\), assume \(T(1)\) is a constant \(c\), which satisfies the base case since \(c \leq 4c/2 + 1^{2}\), simplifying to \(c \leq 2c + 1\). This holds true when \(c\) is positive, establishing the base case.
03

Inductive Hypothesis

Assume that for some \(k\), \(T(k) \leq Ck^{2} \log k\). This is our inductive hypothesis, which we will use to prove that the statement also holds for \(n = 2k\).
04

Inductive Step Application

Using the recurrence relation, \(T(2k) \leq 4T(k) + (2k)^{2}\). By substituting the inductive hypothesis, we have:\[ T(2k) \leq 4(Ck^{2} \log k) + 4k^{2} \]which simplifies to:\[ T(2k) \leq 4Ck^{2} \log k + 4k^{2} \]
05

Simplification Using Logarithmic Properties

Recognize that \(\log(2k) = \log 2 + \log k\), hence:\[ T(2k) \leq 4Ck^{2}(\log 2 + \log k) + 4k^{2} \].Which expands to:\[ T(2k) \leq 4Ck^{2} \log k + 4Ck^{2}\log 2 + 4k^{2} \].
06

Combine and Compare Terms

Group terms involving \(k^{2} \log k\) and constants:\[ T(2k) \leq 4C k^{2} \log k + (4C \log 2 + 4)k^{2} \]. This shows: \( T(2k) \leq 4Ck^{2} \log(2k) \). Thus, \( T(n) = O(n^{2}\log n) \).
07

Conclusion of Inductive Proof

Since the base case holds and the inductive step is proven, by induction, for \(n = 2k\), \(T(n) \leq Cn^{2} \log n\) holds for all powers of 2. Therefore, \(T(n) = O(n^{2} \log n)\) is valid.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Base Case
In mathematical induction, establishing the base case is like laying the foundation for a building; if it's solid, the structure built upon it is likely to hold strong. The base case of our problem involves verifying the inequality for the smallest instance, typically where \(n=1\). Here, we're assuming \(T(1) = c\), a constant that satisfies the inequality \(c \leq 4c/2 + 1^2\). Simplified, this becomes \(c \leq 2c + 1\). This condition holds true when \(c\) is positive, thus successfully establishing our base case. This step is crucial because it shows that the initial premise holds, allowing the hypothetical 'domino effect' of induction to commence.
Inductive Hypothesis
The inductive hypothesis is the stage in mathematical induction where we assume that our statement holds true for an arbitrary case \(k\). It's like assuming, "If it's true for one, it's true for the next." In our scenario, we assume that \(T(k) \leq Ck^2 \log k\) for some constant \(C\). This assumption serves as a stepping stone to demonstrate why it must also hold for the subsequent integer \(n = 2k\). Think of this as middle ground reasoning, where proving this assumption helps us extend the truth to larger cases, ensuring that our inequality holds across various values.
Inductive Step
The inductive step is the critical link in proving our statement beyond the base case, using the inductive hypothesis. Here, our task is to prove the statement \(T(n) \leq Cn^2 \log n\) for \(n = 2k\), based on the assumption it holds for \(k\). Through substitution and simplification, we use the recurrence relation \(T(2k) \leq 4T(k) + (2k)^2\). By inserting the inductive hypothesis, we get:
  • \(T(2k) \leq 4(Ck^2 \log k) + 4k^2\)
Simplifying further and incorporating logarithmic properties, we derive:
  • \(T(2k) \leq 4Ck^2(\log 2 + \log k) + 4k^2\)
Finally, grouping terms reveals the final form matches \(T(n) = O(n^2 \log n)\). This shows that if it's valid for \(k\), it must be valid for \(2k\), completing the proof by induction.
Asymptotic Analysis
Asymptotic analysis is a handy tool in mathematics and computer science, particularly useful for understanding the behavior of algorithms as inputs grow large. In our current context, we use it to describe the time complexity of the function, indicating how \(T(n)\) scales with increasing \(n\). The statement \(T(n) = O(n^2 \log n)\) predicts the upper bound of \(T(n)\), implying that while it increases at that rate, it doesn't do so significantly faster. This doesn't necessarily reflect the precise value of \(T(n)\), but offers a big-picture view, primarily focusing on the dominant terms that affect growth rates. Such analysis aids in comparing algorithm efficiency, especially as \(n\) becomes very large.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show by induction that any solution to a recurrence of the form $$ T(n) \leq 2 T\left(\frac{n}{3}\right)+c \log _{3} n $$ is \(O\left(n \log _{3} n\right)\). What happens if you replace 2 with 3 ? Explain why. Would it make a difference if you used a different base for the logarithm (only an intuitive explanation is needed here)?

If \(S(n)=a S(n-1)+g(n)\) and \(g(n)=c^{n}\) with \(0

This problem explores ways to prove that $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{n}}=1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^{n} $$ for all positive integers \(n\). a. First, we explore how to prove the formula by contradiction. In other words, assume that there is some integer \(n\) that makes the formula false. In this case, there must be some smallest \(n\) that makes the formula false. i. Can this smallest \(n\) be \(1 ?\) ii. What do you know about $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{i}} $$ when \(i\) is a positive integer smaller than this smallest \(n\) ? iii. Is \(n-1\) a positive integer for this smallest \(n\) ? iv. What do you know about $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{n-1}} $$ for this smallest \(n\) ? v. Write the answer to part iv as an equation, add \(2 / 3^{n}\) to both sides, and simplify the right side. vi. What does the equation that results from part \(\mathrm{v}\) say about your assumption that the formula is false? vii. What can you conclude about the truth of the formula? viii. If \(p(k)\) is the statement $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{k}}=1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^{k} $$ what implication did you prove in the process of deriving your contradiction? b. i. What is the base case in a proof by mathematical induction that $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{n}}=1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^{n} $$ for all positive integers \(n\) ? ii. What would you assume as an inductive hypothesis? iii. What would you prove in the inductive step of a proof of this formula by induction? iv. Prove it. v. What does the principle of mathematical induction allow you to conclude? vi. If \(p(k)\) is the statement $$ \frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{9}+\cdots+\frac{2}{3^{k}}=1-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^{k} $$ what implication did you prove in the process of doing your proof by induction?

There is a relationship between the number of vertices in a polygon and the number of triangles in any triangulation of that polygon. State this relationship and prove it by induction.

Prove that every number greater than 7 is a sum of a nonnegative integer multiple of 3 and a nonnegative integer multiple of 5 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free