Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: [10] Write down the binary representation of the decimal number 63.25 assuming the IEEE 754 double precision format.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The required result will be

Step by step solution

01

Define the concept.

The decimal number system uses base 10 and the binary number system uses base 2.

For example, “12” is also equivalent to the value of the binary number system “1100”.

In the IEEE 754 double-precision format,


02

Determine the calculation.

The given number is 63.25.

In the decimal number system, 63.25 is equivalent to the binary number

0100000001001111101000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

This can be written as in the IEEE 754 double-precision format,

Hence, the sign is not negative, the sign is positive.

In the decimal number system, 253 is equivalent to the binary number 11111101.

Hence, the mantissa = 1111101000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

In the binary number system, 10000000100 is equivalent to the decimal number 1028.

Hence, the exponent will be 1028-1023=-5.

Hidden 1 is always present in the format of IEEE 754.

In the IEEE 754 double-precision format,

The given number can be written as

Which is equivalent to the

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Using the IEEE 754 floating-point format, write down the bit pattern that would represent-1/4. Can you represent-1/4exactly?

[30] <§3.4> Using a table similar to that shown in Figure 3.10, calculate 74 divided by 21 using the hardware described in Figure 3.11. You should show the contents of each register on each step. Assume A and B are unsigned 6-bit integers. This algorithm requires a slightly

different approach than that shown in Figure 3.9. You will want to think hard about this, do an experiment or two, or else go to the web to figure out how to make this work correctly. (Hint: one possible solution involves using the fact that Figure 3.11 implies the remainder register can be shifted either direction.)

Based on your answers to 3.32 and 3.33, does

3.984375×10-1+3.4375×10-1+1.771×103=3.984375×10-1+3.4375×10-1+1.771×103?

[10] <§3.5> Write down the bit pattern assuming that we are using base 15 numbers in the fraction instead of base 2. (Base 16 numbers use the symbols 0–9 and A–F. Base 15 numbers would use 0–9 and A–E.) Assume there are 24 bits, and you do not need to normalize. Is this representation exact?

Calculate 3.4179687510-3×6.34765625×10-3×1.05625×102by hand, assuming each of the values are stored in the 16-bit half precision format described in Exercise 3.27 ( and also described in the text). Assume 1 guard, 1 round bit, and 1 sticky bit, and round to the nearest even. Show all the steps, and write your answer in both the 16-bit floating point format and in decimal.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free