Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose, in the other direction, we abandon any pretense at all of DNS hierarchy, and simply move all the .com entries to the root name server: www.cisco.com would become www.cisco, or perhaps just cisco. How would this affect root name server traffic in general? How would this affect such traffic for the specific case of resolving a name like cisco into a Web server address?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Root name server traffic would increase substantially, risking overload and higher latency. Specific name resolutions like 'cisco' would also be slower due to direct handling by the root server.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Domain Name System (DNS) Hierarchy

First, recognize that DNS hierarchy involves multiple levels: the root, top-level domains (TLDs) like .com, second-level domains like cisco, and individual hostnames like www. DNS servers manage these levels, distributing the load.
02

Identify the Current Role of Root Name Servers

Root name servers currently direct queries to appropriate TLD name servers, which then direct to further specific subdomains. They handle only the first step in the query process.
03

Consider the Impact of Moving .com Entries to Root

If all .com entries are managed by the root name server, that server would receive significantly more traffic. Instead of handling queries to direct towards a TLD, it would have to manage a vast number of second-level domain names directly.
04

Evaluate General Traffic Increase

Overall, root name server traffic would increase dramatically because it would have to handle all queries that were previously directed to .com TLD servers. This could lead to higher latency and potential system overload.
05

Assess Specific Case: Resolving 'cisco'

For resolving a name like 'cisco' into a Web server address, the root server would have to respond to every request directly, rather than having the load distributed to lower-level DNS servers. This would similarly increase query traffic for specific names and could slow down the response time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Root name servers
Root name servers are the top-most servers in the Domain Name System (DNS) hierarchy. They don't handle the entire web traffic but play a critical role. Their job is to direct a query to the correct Top-Level Domain (TLD) server. Think of them like a GPS guide pointing you the right way when you ask for something general. For example, if you are looking for a website ending in '.com', the root name servers will point you to the TLD servers responsible for '.com'. But if you transfer all '.com' entries to root name servers, it increases their traffic tremendously. They would then handle more specific queries that are usually managed by lower-level servers.
Domain Name System (DNS)
DNS is like the phonebook of the internet. It translates human-friendly domain names like www.cisco.com into IP addresses that computers use to identify each other on the network.
The DNS hierarchy involves different levels:
  • Root level
  • Top-Level Domains (TLD) like .com, .org, .net
  • Second-level domains like 'cisco' in cisco.com
  • Finally, hostnames like 'www' in www.cisco.com

Each of these levels helps distribute the load, making the internet faster and more efficient. If you eliminate the hierarchy and move everything to the root, you would overload the system.
TLD servers
Top-level domain (TLD) servers manage top-level domain names. For example, TLD servers for '.com' handle all queries for domains ending in '.com'. When a root server directs a query to a TLD server, the TLD server will then point to the next relevant DNS server for that domain.

Moving all '.com' data to root name servers would remove the TLD layer and give much of that workload directly to the root servers. This would lead to slower responses and higher traffic, with root name servers handling millions of additional queries. It would compromise the DNS's efficiency and reliability.
Web server address resolution
Web server address resolution is the process of mapping a domain name to its corresponding IP address. When you type a URL like www.cisco.com into your browser, the DNS works like a detective, finding the correct IP address. Following the DNS hierarchy, a request starts at the root name server and moves downwards.

If root servers had to resolve all queries (like finding the IP address of 'cisco'), the process would slow down due to the traffic overload. Every request would take longer to fulfill, making the internet slower for everyone. Distribution of tasks among different levels of DNS servers keeps the system fast and efficient.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How might you encode audio (or video) data in two packets so that if one packet is lost, then the resolution is simply reduced to what would be expected with half the bandwidth? Explain why this is much more difficult if a JPEG-type encoding is used.

One feature of the existing DNS .com hierarchy is that it is extremely "wide." (a) Propose a more hierarchical reorganization of the .com hierarchy. What objections might you foresee to your proposal's adoption? (b) What might be some of the consequences of having most DNS domain names contain four or more levels, versus the two of many existing names?

DNS servers also allow reverse lookup; given an IP address \(128.112 .169 .4\), it is reversed into a text string 4.169.112.128.in-addr.arpa and looked up using DNS PTR records (which form a hierarchy of domains analogous to that for the address domain hierarchy). Suppose you want to authenticate the sender of a packet based on its host name and are confident that the source IP address is genuine. Explain the insecurity in converting the source address to a name as above and then comparing this name to a given list of trusted hosts. Hint: Whose DNS servers would you be trusting?

Suppose some receivers in a large conference can receive data at a significantly higher bandwidth than others. What sorts of things might be implemented to address this? Hint: Consider both the Session Announcement Protocol (SAP) and the possibility of utilizing third-party "mixers."

As presented in the text, SMTP involves the exchange of several small messages. In most cases, the server responses do not affect what the client sends subsequently. The client might thus implement command pipelining: sending multiple commands in a single message. (a) For what SMTP commands does the client need to pay attention to the server's responses? (b) Assume the server reads each client message with gets() or the equivalent, which reads in a string up to an \(\langle\mathrm{LF}\rangle\). What would it have to do even to detect that a client had used command pipelining? (c) Pipelining is nonetheless known to break with some servers; find out how a client can negotiate its use.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free