Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Estimate the probabilities of finding two messages with the same MD5 checksum, given total numbers of messages of \(2^{63}, 2^{64}\), and \(2^{65}\). Hint: This is the birthday problem again, as in Exercise 49 of Chapter 2, and again the probability that the \(k+1\) th message has a different checksum from each of the preceding \(k\) is \(1-k / 2^{128}\). However, the approximation in the hint there for simplifying the product fails rather badly now. So, instead, take the log of each side and use the approximation \(\log \left(1-k / 2^{128}\right) \approx-k / 2^{128}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
For \(2^{63}, P(\text{collision})\) \(\approx 1 - e^{-0.125} \). For \(2^{64}, P(\text{collision})\) \( \approx 1 - e^{-0.5} \ ). For \(2^{65}, P(\text{collision})\() \approx 1 - e^{-2} \ ).

Step by step solution

01

- Understanding the Birthday Problem

Recall that the problem is similar to the birthday problem. We are calculating the probability of at least two messages having the same MD5 checksum out of a given number of messages.
02

- Calculate the Probability of No Collision

For a given number of messages, the probability that the \(k+1\)th message has a different checksum from the previous \(k\) messages can be calculated using the formula: \[P(\text{no collision}) = \prod_{k=0}^{n-1} \left(1 - \frac{k}{2^{128}}\right)\] where \(n\) is the number of messages.
03

- Using Logarithms to Simplify

Take the natural logarithm of each side to simplify the product. Using the approximation \(\log (1 - \frac{k}{2^{128}}) \approx -\frac{k}{2^{128}}\), we get: \[\log \left(P(\text{no collision})\right) = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \log \left(1 - \frac{k}{2^{128}}\right) \approx \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} -\frac{k}{2^{128}}\]
04

- Summation of the Series

The summation of the series: \[\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} -\frac{k}{2^{128}}\] can be approximated using the sum of the first \(n-1\) integers: \[\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} k = \frac{(n-1)n}{2}\] Therefore, \[\log \left(P(\text{no collision})\right) \approx -\frac{(n-1)n}{2 \cdot 2^{128}}\]
05

- Exponentiating to Find Probability

Exponentiate both sides to solve for \(P(\text{no collision})\): \[P(\text{no collision}) \approx e^{-\frac{(n-1)n}{2 \cdot 2^{128}}}\]
06

- Calculate for Given Values

Calculate \(P(\text{no collision})\) for \(n = 2^{63}, 2^{64}, 2^{65}\): \[\text{For } n = 2^{63}: P(\text{no collision}) \approx e^{-\frac{(2^{63} - 1)2^{63}}{2 \cdot 2^{128}}} = e^{-\frac{2^{126} - 2^{63}}{2^{129}}} = e^{-(2^{-3} - 2^{-65})} \approx e^{-0.125}\] \[\text{For } n = 2^{64}: P(\text{no collision}) \approx e^{-\frac{2^{128} - 2^{64}}{2^{129}}} = e^{-(0.5 - 2^{-65})} \approx e^{-0.5}\] \[\text{For } n = 2^{65}: P(\text{no collision}) \approx e^{-\frac{2^{130} - 2^{65}}{2^{129}}} = e^{-(2 - 2^{-64})} \approx e^{-2}\]
07

- Find Probability of Collision

The probability of at least one collision is: \[P(\text{collision}) = 1 - P(\text{no collision})\] Therefore, for the given values: \[\text{For } n = 2^{63}: P(\text{collision}) \approx 1 - e^{-0.125}\] \[\text{For } n = 2^{64}: P(\text{collision}) \approx 1 - e^{-0.5}\] \[\text{For } n = 2^{65}: P(\text{collision}) \approx 1 - e^{-2}\]

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

MD5 checksum collision
In cryptography, an MD5 checksum is a 128-bit hash value used to verify data integrity. It is designed such that if two different data inputs produce the same MD5 checksum, this is termed a collision. The birthday problem is used in this exercise to estimate the probability of such a collision. Given the size of the MD5 hash output (128 bits), the probability of finding at least one collision increases significantly when the number of hashed messages grows. As the hash space is finite (2^128 possible hash values), hashing around \(2^{64}\) unique messages will likely lead to collisions because we already have a significant portion of hash values covered.
Probability theory in cryptographic analysis
Probability theory helps in predicting the chances of certain outcomes, making it invaluable in cryptographic analysis. In this context, we utilize it to estimate the likelihood of checksum collisions within a given number of messages. The birthday problem's analogy provides a simplified way to understand these probabilities. Considering an event with many possible outcomes, such as generating a unique MD5 checksum for each message, the probability formula for no collision is \(P(\text{no collision}) = \prod_{k=0}^{n-1} \(1 - \frac{k}{2^{128}}\)\). This helps to calculate the odds of every new message having a unique checksum relative to the preceding ones. Hence, as more messages are hashed, the collision probability grows.
Logarithmic approximation
Logarithmic approximation simplifies complex multiplicative problems into additive ones, which are easier to manage. For instance, when calculating the product for no collision probability in the birthday problem, the product \(P(\text{no collision}) = \prod_{k=0}^{n-1} \(1 - \frac{k}{2^{128}}\)\) becomes unwieldy. By taking the natural log of both sides, we convert the multiplication into summation. Using the approximation \(\log(1-x) \approx -x\), the product simplifies to \(\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} -\frac{k}{2^{128}}\), further reduced to \(-\frac{(n-1)n}{2 \cdot 2^{128}}\). This logarithmic method makes dealing with large numbers more feasible in cryptographic analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you are doing RSA encryption with \(p=13, q=7\), and \(e=5 .\) (a) Find the decryption exponent \(d\). (Hint: Use the Euclidean dividing algorithm.) (b) Encrypt the message \(m=7 .\) (c) Decrypt the cypher \(c=2\).

Suppose you are doing RSA encryption with \(p=101, q=113\), and \(e=3 .\) (a) Find the decryption exponent \(d\). (Hint: Although there are methodical ways to do this, trial and error is efficient for \(e=3 .\) ) (b) Encrypt the message \(m=9876\). Note that evaluating \(m^{3}\) with 32 -bit arithmetic results in overflow.

Suppose you want your filter-based firewall to block all incoming Telnet connections, but to allow outbound Telnet connections. One approach would be to block all inbound packets to the designated Telnet port (23). (a) We might want to block inbound packets to other ports as well, but what inbound TCP connections must be permitted in order not to interfere with outbound Telnet? (b) Now suppose your firewall is allowed to use the TCP header Flags bits in addition to the port numbers. Explain how you can achieve the desired Telnet effect here while at the same time allowing no inbound TCP connections.

Suppose a firewall is configured to allow outbound TCP connections but inbound connections only to specified ports. The FTP protocol now presents a problem: When an inside client contacts an outside server, the outbound TCP control connection can be opened normally but the TCP data connection traditionally is inbound. (a) Look up the FTP protocol in, for example, Request for Comments 959 . Find out how the PORT command works. Discuss how the client might be written so as to limit the number of ports to which the firewall must grant inbound access. Can the number of such ports be limited to one? (b) Find out how the FTP PASV command can be used to solve this firewall problem.

Suppose we have a very short secret \(s\) (e.g., a single bit or even a Social Security number), and we wish to send someone else a message \(m\) now that will not reveal \(s\) but that can be used later to verify that we did know \(s\). Explain why \(m=\operatorname{MD} 5(s)\) or \(m=\mathrm{E}(s)\) with RSA encryption would not be secure choices, and suggest a better choice.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free