Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose two people want to play poker over the network. To "deal" the cards they need a mechanism for fairly choosing a random number \(x\) between them; each party stands to lose if the other party can unfairly influence the choice of \(x\). Describe such a mechanism. Hint: You may assume that if either of two bit strings \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) are random, then the exclusive-OR \(x=x_{1} \oplus x_{2}\) is random.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Generate random bit strings, exchange them, compute the XOR, and use the result as the random number.

Step by step solution

01

Generate Random Bit Strings

Both players should independently generate a random bit string. Let's call these bit strings \( x_{1} \) and \( x_{2} \). These strings need to be securely generated so that neither player can predict the other’s string.
02

Exchange the Bit Strings

The two players should then securely exchange their respective bit strings over the network. This can be done using encryption to ensure security and prevent interception or tampering.
03

Compute the XOR

Once both bit strings have been exchanged, each player computes the exclusive-OR (XOR) of these two strings. The formula is \( x = x_{1} \bigoplus x_{2} \). This operation will provide a new bit string, \( x \), based on both initial strings.
04

Use the Result

The resultant bit string \( x \) is the random number that will be used. Each player can now use \( x \) knowing that it was fairly generated and neither player could single-handedly influence its outcome.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

XOR Operation
The XOR operation, also known as 'exclusive OR,' is a fundamental concept in computer science and digital logic. This operation takes two input bits and returns one output bit based on a simple rule: the output is true if and only if the inputs are different.
For instance, when you XOR two bits: 0 XOR 0 = 0, 0 XOR 1 = 1, 1 XOR 0 = 1, and 1 XOR 1 = 0. Why is XOR useful in generating random bit strings? It ensures that if either of two input strings is random, the resulting string remains random. This is why it is often used in cryptographic protocols.
The XOR operation can also be performed on longer bit strings by applying the XOR operation bit by bit across the strings. For example, given two bit strings 1101 and 1011, the XOR result would be 0110. This property makes XOR a great tool for fair random number generation in secure communications.
The ability to provide randomness and unrecoverable outcomes from known inputs makes XOR a powerful tool for ensuring fairness and mitigating bias during random number generation. It's essential in both cryptography and network security.
Random Bit String
A random bit string is a sequence of bits (0s and 1s) generated in such a way that each bit is equally likely to be 0 or 1, independently of other bits. Random bit strings are crucial for various applications in cryptography, gaming, and secure communications. To generate a random bit string, it's important to use a secure random number generator (RNG). A secure RNG ensures that each bit in the generated string is unpredictably random and not influenced by any external factors.
In our context, both players independently generate a random bit string. These strings need to be long enough to ensure unpredictability and security. For example, generating a 128-bit string provides a high level of randomness. Once generated, the security of these bit strings is maintained by preventing any external party from predicting them.
Using these independently generated random bit strings, the XOR operation ensures that the final outcome remains random as long as at least one of the two strings was genuinely random. This characteristic is particularly important in network communications where fairness and security are paramount, like in the poker game scenario described in the original exercise.
Network Communication Security
When players exchange their random bit strings over a network, they must do so securely to prevent any third parties from intercepting or tampering with the data. Network communication security involves encrypting the data being sent so that only the intended recipient can decode and use it.
Encryption is a process where plain text is converted into a coded form using an encryption algorithm and a key. This ensures that even if the data is intercepted, it cannot be read or altered by anyone who does not have the corresponding decryption key. There are various encryption techniques like symmetric and asymmetric encryption. For simple and secure exchange, players can use methods like Transport Layer Security (TLS) or Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) to encrypt their bit strings.
Beyond encryption, network communication security also involves verifying the identity of the communicating parties, ensuring data integrity, and protecting against attacks like eavesdropping, man-in-the-middle, and replay attacks. Implementing these measures ensures that the bit strings remain confidential and unaltered during transmission, maintaining the fairness and randomness required for generating the final random number for the poker game.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One mechanism for resisting "replay" attacks in password authentication is to use one-time passwords: A list of passwords is prepared, and once password \([N]\) has been accepted, the server decrements \(N\) and prompts for password \([N-1]\) next time. At \(N=0\) a new list is needed. Outline a mechanism by which the user and server need only remember one master password \(m p\) and have available locally a way to compute password \([N]=f(m p, N)\). Hint: Let \(g\) be an appropriate one-way function (e.g., MD5) and let password \([N]=g^{N}(m p)=g\), applied \(N\) times to \(m p .\) Explain why knowing password \([N]\) doesn't help reveal password \([N-1]\).

It is said that IPSEC may not work with Network Address Translation (NAT) (RFC 1631). However, whether IPSEC will work with NAT depends on which mode of IPSEC and NAT we use. Suppose we use true NAT, where only IP addresses are translated (without port translation). Will IPSEC and NAT work in each of the following cases? Explain why or why not. (a) IPSEC uses \(\mathrm{AH}\) transport mode. (b) IPSEC uses \(\mathrm{AH}\) tunnel mode. (c) IPSEC uses ESP transport mode. (d) IPSEC uses ESP tunnel mode. (e) What if we use PAT (Port Address Translation), also known as Network Address/Port Translation (NAPT) in NAT, where in addition to IP addresses, port numbers will be translated to share one IP address from outside the private networ?

Learn about a key escrow encryption scheme (for example, Clipper). What are the pros and cons of key escrow?

Estimate the probabilities of finding two messages with the same MD5 checksum, given total numbers of messages of \(2^{63}, 2^{64}\), and \(2^{65}\). Hint: This is the birthday problem again, as in Exercise 49 of Chapter 2, and again the probability that the \(k+1\) th message has a different checksum from each of the preceding \(k\) is \(1-k / 2^{128}\). However, the approximation in the hint there for simplifying the product fails rather badly now. So, instead, take the log of each side and use the approximation \(\log \left(1-k / 2^{128}\right) \approx-k / 2^{128}\).

The Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol is vulnerable to a "man-in-the- middle" attack. Explain how an adversary sitting between two participants can trick them into thinking they have established a shared secret between themselves, when in fact they have each established a secret with the adversary. Outline how DiffieHellman can be extended to protect against this possibility.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free