Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Learn about a key escrow encryption scheme (for example, Clipper). What are the pros and cons of key escrow?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Key escrow aids law enforcement and data recovery but poses privacy and security risks.

Step by step solution

01

- Introduction to Key Escrow

A key escrow encryption scheme is a system where encryption keys are stored by a third party, known as an escrow agent. One example of such a system is the Clipper chip, which was introduced by the US government.
02

- Pros of Key Escrow

1. **Law Enforcement Access**: Key escrow allows law enforcement agencies access to encrypted data when authorized, which can help in combating crime and terrorism.2. **Data Recovery**: If a user loses their encryption key, the escrow agent can provide the key, allowing recovery of data.3. **Organizational Control**: In a business setting, key escrow can help ensure that critical data remains accessible to the organization even if an employee leaves or loses their key.
03

- Cons of Key Escrow

1. **Security Risks**: Storing keys with a third party creates a potential point of failure. If the escrow agent's security is compromised, all data secured by those keys could be at risk.2. **Privacy Concerns**: Key escrow systems can be seen as a threat to privacy since the escrow agent has potential access to all encrypted communications and data.3. **Trust Issues**: Users must trust that the escrow agent will protect the keys diligently and not misuse their power.
04

- Conclusion

Key escrow encryption schemes, like the Clipper chip, offer benefits such as aiding in law enforcement and data recovery, but also present risks including security vulnerabilities and privacy concerns. The choice to use such a system depends on weighing these pros and cons.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Law Enforcement Access
Key escrow encryption allows law enforcement agencies to access encrypted data when authorized. This means that if criminal activity is suspected, authorities can unlock crucial information to aid their investigations. This capability is particularly valuable in cases involving terrorism, organized crime, and other serious threats. By having a mechanism for lawful access, law enforcement agencies can potentially save lives and prevent major incidents.
Data Recovery
One significant advantage of key escrow encryption is data recovery. When a user loses their encryption key, it usually means their data is lost forever. However, with key escrow, the escrow agent can provide the backup key. This ensures that important information, such as business data or personal documents, remains accessible. This feature adds an invaluable safety net for both individuals and organizations, shielding them from data loss tragedies.
Security Risks
Storing encryption keys with a third party introduces specific security risks. If the escrow agent's security measures fail, all encrypted data controlled by those keys could be compromised. This potential point of failure means hackers could target the escrow agent to gain access to vast amounts of sensitive information. Thus, while key escrow offers some benefits, it also creates a new security vulnerability that must be carefully managed.
Privacy Concerns
Key escrow systems can create significant privacy concerns. Because escrow agents have access to encryption keys, there's a risk they could misuse this power. Additionally, even if the agent acts with integrity, the mere fact that access is possible raises concerns among privacy advocates. For individuals and organizations, the assurance that no one else can view their encrypted data is paramount, and key escrow challenges this assurance.
Trust Issues
The success of key escrow encryption hinges on trust. Users need to believe that the escrow agent will protect their keys responsibly and avoid misusing their elevated access. Trust issues arise because users must rely on the agent's integrity and security protocols. The potential for insider threats or negligence means that trust is a fragile component. To adopt key escrow, an individual's or organization's trust in the escrow agent must be robust and well-founded.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One mechanism for resisting "replay" attacks in password authentication is to use one-time passwords: A list of passwords is prepared, and once password \([N]\) has been accepted, the server decrements \(N\) and prompts for password \([N-1]\) next time. At \(N=0\) a new list is needed. Outline a mechanism by which the user and server need only remember one master password \(m p\) and have available locally a way to compute password \([N]=f(m p, N)\). Hint: Let \(g\) be an appropriate one-way function (e.g., MD5) and let password \([N]=g^{N}(m p)=g\), applied \(N\) times to \(m p .\) Explain why knowing password \([N]\) doesn't help reveal password \([N-1]\).

Suppose we have a very short secret \(s\) (e.g., a single bit or even a Social Security number), and we wish to send someone else a message \(m\) now that will not reveal \(s\) but that can be used later to verify that we did know \(s\). Explain why \(m=\operatorname{MD} 5(s)\) or \(m=\mathrm{E}(s)\) with RSA encryption would not be secure choices, and suggest a better choice.

Suppose that RSA is used to send a message \(m\) to three recipients, who have relatively prime encryption moduli \(n_{1}, n_{2}\), and \(n_{3} .\) All three recipients use the same encryption exponent \(e=3\), a once-popular choice as it makes encryption very fast. Show that someone who intercepts all three encrypted messages \(c_{1}=m^{3}\) \(\bmod n_{1}, c_{2}=m^{3} \bmod n_{2}\), and \(c_{3}=m^{3} \bmod n_{1}\) can efficiently decipher \(m .\) Hint: The Chinese remainder theorem implies that you can efficiently find a \(c\) such that \(c=c_{1} \bmod n_{1}, c=c_{2} \bmod n_{2}\), and \(c=c_{3} \bmod n_{3} .\) Assume this, and show that it implies \(c=m^{3} \bmod n_{1} n_{2} n_{3} .\) Then note \(m^{3}

Suppose you are doing RSA encryption with \(p=13, q=7\), and \(e=5 .\) (a) Find the decryption exponent \(d\). (Hint: Use the Euclidean dividing algorithm.) (b) Encrypt the message \(m=7 .\) (c) Decrypt the cypher \(c=2\).

Suppose you are doing RSA encryption with \(p=101, q=113\), and \(e=3 .\) (a) Find the decryption exponent \(d\). (Hint: Although there are methodical ways to do this, trial and error is efficient for \(e=3 .\) ) (b) Encrypt the message \(m=9876\). Note that evaluating \(m^{3}\) with 32 -bit arithmetic results in overflow.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free