Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(p \leq 1\) be the fraction of machines in a network that are big-endian; the remaining \(1-p\) fraction are little-endian. Suppose we choose two machines at random and send an int from one to the other. Give the average number of byte-order conversions needed for both big-endian network byte order and receiver-makes-right, for \(p=0.1, p=0.5\), and \(p=0.9\). Hint: The probability that both endpoints are big-endian is \(p^{2} ;\) the probability that the two endpoints use different byte orders is \(2 p(1-p)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
For big-endian network byte order and receiver-makes-right: E=0.18 for p=0.1 and p=0.9; E=0.5 for p=0.5.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Probabilities

First, let's identify the probabilities given: 1. The probability that both machines are big-endian is given by: \[ P(\text{B and B}) = p^2 \] 2. The probability that both machines are little-endian is: \[ P(\text{L and L}) = (1-p)^2 \] 3. The probability that one machine is big-endian and the other is little-endian (or vice versa) is given by: \[ P(\text{B and L or L and B}) = 2p(1-p) \]
02

Calculate Conversions for Big-endian Network Byte Order

In a big-endian network byte order, only conversions between a big-endian machine and a little-endian machine need to count. The average number of conversions can be calculated as follows: \[ E_{\text{big-endian network}} = 2p(1-p) \]
03

Calculate Conversions for Receiver-makes-right

In a receiver-makes-right method, the data is converted to the byte order of the receiving machine. Therefore, each pair of differing byte orders needs conversion, considering the total probability of different byte orders: \[ E_{\text{receiver-makes-right}} = 2p(1-p) \]
04

Apply the Given Values of p

Now, compute the average number of conversions for each given value of p:For \( p = 0.1 \): \[ E = 2(0.1)(1-0.1) = 0.18 \] For \( p = 0.5 \): \[ E = 2(0.5)(1-0.5) = 0.5 \] For \( p = 0.9 \): \[ E = 2(0.9)(1-0.9) = 0.18 \]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

big-endian
Big-endian is a method of storing or transmitting data where the most significant byte is stored or transmitted first. This format is commonly used in network protocols to ensure consistency. For example, if we have a 32-bit data representation of the number 0x12345678, in big-endian format, it would be stored as follows:
• Byte 1: 0x12
• Byte 2: 0x34
• Byte 3: 0x56
• Byte 4: 0x78

This makes it easier to read data values without needing additional conversion steps, and many Internet protocols, such as IP and TCP, use big-endian format for this reason. Big-endian helps in preserving the natural ordering of numeric values which is intuitive for humans and certain algorithms.
little-endian
Little-endian is a method of storing or transmitting data where the least significant byte is stored or transmitted first. This format is often used in computer architecture, particularly in x86 processors. For the same 32-bit representation of the number 0x12345678, little-endian format would be stored as:
• Byte 1: 0x78
• Byte 2: 0x56
• Byte 3: 0x34
• Byte 4: 0x12

Little-endian is useful in tasks such as multi-byte addition, where starting from the least significant byte can be more efficient. However, it can lead to complications when interfacing with networks or systems that use big-endian format.
probability calculations
Probability calculations are essential in determining the likelihood of different byte-order configurations in network communication. The exercise includes key probabilities you need to know:
1. The probability that both machines are big-endian is given by: \( P(\text{B and B}) = p^2 \)
2. The probability that both machines are little-endian is: \( P(\text{L and L}) = (1-p)^2 \)
3. The probability that one machine is big-endian and the other is little-endian (or vice versa) is: \( P(\text{B and L or L and B}) = 2p(1-p) \)

These calculations help us understand scenarios involving communication between machines with different byte orders. By knowing the probabilities, we can calculate the expected number of byte-endian conversions needed for different methods, like big-endian network byte order and receiver-makes-right.
network byte order
Network byte order usually means using big-endian byte arrangement for transmitting data over networks. It ensures all communicating devices interpret the bytes in the same order. This consistency prevents misinterpretation of data caused by varying endianness. When data is sent from a big-endian machine to a little-endian machine, or vice versa, byte-order conversions might be required to adhere to network protocol standards.

Let’s compute the average number of byte conversions for big-endian network byte order:
Given by: \( E_{\text{big-endian network}} = 2p(1-p) \)
Here, only conversions between a big-endian machine and a little-endian machine are counted.
receiver-makes-right
Receiver-makes-right is a method where the receiving machine converts the incoming data to its own byte order. This way, the burden of byte-order conversion falls on the receiver:

Given by: \( E_{\text{receiver-makes-right}} = 2p(1-p) \)
Both big-endian to little-endian and little-endian to big-endian conversions are considered. Every time machines with different byte orders communicate, the receiver corrects the byte format. This method can be advantageous as it ensures data is always in the correct format for the receiving system, though it requires the receiver to have conversion logic implemented.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you want to implement fast-forward and reverse for MPEG streams. What problems do you run into if you limit your mechanism to displaying I frames only? If you don't, then to display a given frame in the fast-forward sequence, what is the largest number of frames in the original sequence you may have to decode?

Suppose a file contains the letters \(a, b, c\), and \(d\). Nominally, we require 2 bits per letter to store such a file. (a) Assume the letter \(a\) occurs \(50 \%\) of the time, \(b\) occurs \(30 \%\) of the time, and \(c\) and \(d\) each occur \(10 \%\) of the time. Give an encoding of each letter as a bit string that provides optimal compression. Hint: Use a single bit for \(a\). (b) What is the percentage of compression you achieve above? (This is the average of the compression percentages achieved for each letter, weighted by the letter's frequency.) (c) Repeat this, assuming \(a\) and \(b\) each occur \(40 \%\) of the time, coccurs \(15 \%\) of the time, and \(d\) occurs \(5 \%\) of the time.

The presentation formatting process is sometimes regarded as an autonomous protocol layer, separate from the application. If this is so, why might including data compression in the presentation layer be a bad idea?

Suppose we have a video of two white points moving toward each other at a uniform rate against a black background. We encode it via MPEG. In one I frame the two points are 100 pixels apart; in the next I frame they have merged. The final point of merger happens to lie at the center of a \(16 \times 16\) macroblock. (a) Describe how you might optimally encode the Y component of the intervening B (or P) frames. (b) Now suppose the points are in color, and that the color changes slowly as the points move. Describe what the encoding of the U and V values might look like.

Using the programming language of your choice that supports user-defined automatic type conversions, define a type netint and supply conversions that enable assignments and equality comparisons between ints and netints. Can a generalization of this approach solve the problem of network argument marshalling?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free