Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose two TCP connections share a path through a router R. The router's queue size is six segments; each connection has a stable congestion window of three segments. No congestion control is used by these connections. A third TCP connection now is attempted, also through R. The third connection does not use congestion control either. Describe a scenario in which, for at least a while, the third connection gets none of the available bandwidth, and the first two connections proceed with \(50 \%\) each. Does it matter if the third connection uses slow start? How does full congestion avoidance on the part of the first two connections help solve this?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The third connection gets no bandwidth initially because the queue is filled by the first two connections. Slow start for the third connection doesn't help without room in the queue. Full congestion avoidance by the first two connections allows fairer bandwidth sharing.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the queue and congestion windows

The router R has a queue size of six segments. Each of the two initial connections has a congestion window of three segments. This means that under full load, both connections together would fill the router's queue exactly (3 segments per connection * 2 connections = 6 segments).
02

Introduce the third connection

A third TCP connection attempts to use the router R. This new connection also does not use congestion control. Since the router queue is already full with the segments from the first two connections, there is initially no space for the third connection's segments.
03

Identify bandwidth allocation without congestion control

Without congestion control, the first two connections continue to fill the router's queue with their segments. As segments are processed and leave the queue, the next segments from the first two connections will immediately fill the available space. Therefore, the third connection will get none of the available bandwidth because its segments cannot enter the router's queue.
04

Analyze the impact of slow start for the third connection

If the third connection uses slow start, it starts with a smaller congestion window and gradually increases it. However, since the first two connections already fill the router queue without ever leaving room for the third connection (because they quickly refill any emptied space), the third connection's slow start does not help it gain access to the queue or bandwidth.
05

Examine the effect of full congestion avoidance

If the first two connections use full congestion avoidance, they respond to congestion signals by reducing their window sizes. This would allow space in the router's queue periodically, giving the third connection a chance to place its segments in the queue and share bandwidth more fairly.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Router Queue Management
The router in the exercise has a queue size of six segments. This queue management is crucial for handling the packets that flow through it. When the router's queue is full, new packets cannot enter until space is available. This scenario leads to the dropping of packets or delayed transmission, often resulting in congestion.
Effective router queue management aims to balance the flow of packets. This balance helps to avoid congestion and ensure fair bandwidth allocation. Routers may use algorithms to dynamically manage the queue, allowing for better handling of fluctuating network demands.
Congestion Window
The congestion window is an essential part of TCP's congestion control mechanism. It dictates the number of segments a TCP sender can transmit without receiving an acknowledgment from the receiver. In the provided exercise, each of the initial two TCP connections has a congestion window of three segments.

When the congestion window is high, more data can be sent before awaiting acknowledgment. However, if congestion occurs (when the network can't handle the volume), the congestion window size will reduce to avoid overwhelming the network, resulting in fewer segments being sent.

Ultimately, the congestion window helps balance the data flow based on current network conditions, ensuring the network does not become overloaded.
Bandwidth Allocation
Bandwidth allocation refers to how network bandwidth is distributed across various connections. In the exercise scenario where no congestion control is applied, the first two connections dominate the available bandwidth by quickly filling up the router's queue.

The third connection fails to get any bandwidth because the available space in the queue is immediately filled by the first two connections' segments. This unfair distribution highlights the importance of incorporating proper congestion control techniques.
  • With congestion control, each connection responds to network congestion, leading to more equitable bandwidth sharing.
  • Without it, some connections may monopolize the bandwidth, leaving others without any.
Slow Start Mechanism
Slow start is a phase in TCP congestion control designed to prevent congestion before it happens. When a connection starts, it begins with a small congestion window and gradually increases it as acknowledgments are received.

During slow start, the congestion window grows exponentially until it reaches a threshold, after which it grows linearly. This gradual increase helps to probe the network's capacity and find an optimal data transmission rate.

In the scenario, even if the third connection uses slow start, it would still struggle to transmit data as the initial window size is too small to compete with the already full router queue from the first two connections.
Congestion Avoidance
Congestion avoidance is another phase in TCP congestion control aimed at maintaining efficient network usage without causing congestion. It typically follows the slow start phase once a certain threshold is reached.

In congestion avoidance, the congestion window size increases linearly, allowing the connection to adjust its rate of data transmission to the network conditions more finely. If the network starts showing signs of congestion, the window size is reduced to prevent further congestion.

In the exercise scenario, if the first two connections used full congestion avoidance, they would not fill the router queue continuously. This would leave periodic gaps in the queue, allowing the third connection a chance to transmit its segments and ensuring a fairer bandwidth allocation across all connections.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose two hosts \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\) are connected via a router \(\mathrm{R}\). The \(\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{R}\) link has infinite bandwidth; the \(R-B\) link can send one packet per second. \(R\) 's queue is infinite. Load is to be measured as the number of packets per second sent from A to B. Sketch the throughput-versus-load and delay-versus-load graphs, or if a graph cannot be drawn, explain why. Would another way to measure load be more appropriate?

Suppose that between \(A\) and \(B\) there is a router \(R\). The \(A-R\) bandwidth is infinite (that is, packets are not delayed), but the R-B link introduces a bandwidth delay of 1 packet per second (that is, 2 packets take 2 seconds, etc.). Acknowledgments from \(\mathrm{B}\) to \(\mathrm{R}\), though, are sent instantaneously. \(\mathrm{A}\) sends data to \(\mathrm{B}\) over a \(\mathrm{TCP}\) connection, using slow start but with an arbitrarily large window size. R has a queue size of 1 , in addition to the packet it is sending. At each second, the sender first processes any arriving ACKs and then responds to any timeouts. (a) Assuming a fixed TimeOut period of 2 seconds, what is sent and received for \(\mathrm{T}=0,1, \ldots, 6\) seconds? Is the link ever idle due to timeouts? (b) What changes if TimeOut is 3 seconds instead?

Suppose an RSVP router suddenly loses its reservation state, but otherwise remains running. (a) What will happen to the existing reserved flows if the router handles reserved and nonreserved flows via a single FIFO queue? (b) What might happen to the existing reserved flows if the router used weighted fair queuing to segregate reserved and nonreserved traffic? (c) Eventually, the receivers on these flows will request that their reservations be renewed. Give a scenario in which these requests are denied.

Suppose you are downloading a large file over a 3-KBps phone link. Your software displays an average-bytes-per-second counter. How will TCP congestion control and occasional packet losses cause this counter to fluctuate? Assume that only a third, say, of the total RTT is spent on the phone link.

You are an Internet service provider; your client hosts connect directly to your routers. You know some hosts are using experimental TCPs and suspect some may be using a "greedy" TCP with no congestion control. What measurements might you make at your router to establish that a client was not using slow start at all? If a client used slow start on startup but not after a timeout, could you detect that?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free