Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

You are an Internet service provider; your client hosts connect directly to your routers. You know some hosts are using experimental TCPs and suspect some may be using a "greedy" TCP with no congestion control. What measurements might you make at your router to establish that a client was not using slow start at all? If a client used slow start on startup but not after a timeout, could you detect that?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Monitor packet patterns, interval timings, and RTT to detect absence of slow start. Look for abnormal congestion window adjustments and post-timeout behavior for slow start non-compliance.

Step by step solution

01

- Identify TCP Connection Patterns

Monitor the packets being transmitted from the hosts. Look for the characteristic exponential growth pattern in the number of packets that indicates the use of TCP slow start. If a host's packet transmission ramps up linearly or remains constant, it might be an indication that slow start is not being used.
02

- Measure Packet Intervals

Measure the intervals between consecutive packet transmissions from the hosts. In TCP slow start, intervals should decrease as more packets are sent. If the intervals remain constant or do not exhibit the expected pattern of decrease, it suggests that there is no slow start operation.
03

- Analyze Round-Trip Time (RTT)

Track the Round-Trip Time for the packets sent to and received from the hosts. During slow start, the RTT might initially be higher due to network congestion and then stabilize. Consistent or random RTT values that do not follow this trend may indicate bypassing slow start.
04

- Check for Congestion Avoidance Phase

Once the initial slow start phase is over, TCP moves to the congestion avoidance phase. Monitor the congestion window (cwnd) size for each host. A client not using slow start may show irregular increases in cwnd rather than the expected additive increase.
05

- Detect Timeout Behavior

Observe the transmission behavior of the hosts after a timeout. TCP typically restarts with slow start after a timeout. If the packets do not show the exponential growth pattern typically associated with slow start after a timeout, it's likely that the host is not adhering to slow start protocols post-timeout.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

TCP slow start
TCP slow start is a congestion control algorithm designed to prevent network congestion. When a TCP connection starts, it begins with a small congestion window (cwnd), typically set to the size of a single Maximum Segment Size (MSS). The cwnd then grows exponentially with each acknowledgment received. This means that for every acknowledged packet, the cwnd doubles until it reaches a threshold (ssthresh). After reaching this threshold, TCP transitions to the congestion avoidance phase.

To detect if a host is skipping TCP slow start, monitor the initial packet transmission patterns. Look for exponential growth in packet numbers; a lack of this exponential increase may indicate that the host is not using slow start.
packet transmission patterns
Packet transmission patterns provide critical insight into whether TCP slow start is in use. During the slow start phase, the number of packets sent by the host should initially grow exponentially.

Here are specific steps to monitor packet transmission patterns:
  • Count the number of packets that are sent consecutively from the host.
  • Track the pattern in which these packets are sent over time.
  • If the number increases quickly and exponentially, TCP slow start is likely being used.
  • If the increase is linear or constant, slow start might not be in operation.


Regular monitoring of these patterns can help in identifying any deviations from the expected TCP behavior.
Round-Trip Time (RTT) analysis
Round-Trip Time (RTT) is the duration a packet takes to travel from the sender to the receiver and back. Analyzing RTT can help in understanding network performance and congestion.

During the TCP slow start phase, the RTT may initially be high due to network congestion but should stabilize as congestion decreases.
  • Track the RTT for packets sent and received.
  • Observe how these times change over the connection duration.
  • Look for an initial higher RTT that then stabilizes; this is typical during slow start.
  • Consistent or erratic RTT values that do not follow this pattern could indicate the host is bypassing slow start.


Effective RTT analysis requires continuous monitoring and data logging.
congestion window (cwnd) monitoring
Monitoring the congestion window (cwnd) provides insights into TCP’s flow control. The cwnd determines how many packets a sender can transmit before needing an acknowledgment.

During slow start, the cwnd should grow exponentially until it reaches a threshold known as ssthresh. After this, TCP enters the congestion avoidance phase where cwnd grows additively.
  • Regularly monitor the cwnd size for each TCP connection.
  • Look for exponential growth patterns during the initial stage.
  • After reaching ssthresh, the growth should become linear.
  • Irregular increases in cwnd size could indicate that the host is bypassing TCP slow start protocols.


Accurate cwnd monitoring helps ensure compliance with TCP congestion control principles.
timeout behavior in TCP
Timeouts play a crucial role in TCP’s recovery mechanism. When a timeout occurs, TCP assumes packet loss due to congestion and thus, reduces the cwnd to its initial value, restarting the slow start phase.

To detect non-compliance post-timeout:
  • Monitor the packet transmissions after a timeout event.
  • Look for the expected exponential growth pattern indicative of slow start.
  • Absence of this pattern suggests that the host is neglecting the slow start protocol after timeouts.


Observing timeout behavior can indicate whether a client adheres to proper TCP congestion control after network disruptions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose two hosts \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\) are connected via a router \(\mathrm{R}\). The \(\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{R}\) link has infinite bandwidth; the \(R-B\) link can send one packet per second. \(R\) 's queue is infinite. Load is to be measured as the number of packets per second sent from A to B. Sketch the throughput-versus-load and delay-versus-load graphs, or if a graph cannot be drawn, explain why. Would another way to measure load be more appropriate?

In fair queuing, the value \(F_{i}\) was interpreted as a timestamp: the time when the \(i\) th packet would finish transmitting. Give an interpretation of \(F_{i}\) for weighted fair queuing, and also give a formula for it in terms of \(F_{i-1}\), arrival time \(A_{i}\), packet size \(P_{i}\), and weight \(w\) assigned to the flow.

Consider a simple congestion-control algorithm that uses linear increase and multiplicative decrease but not slow start, that works in units of packets rather than bytes, and that starts each connection with a congestion window equal to one packet. Give a detailed sketch of this algorithm. Assume the delay is latency only, and that when a group of packets is sent, only a single ACK is returned. Plot the congestion window as a function of round-trip times for the situation in which the following packets are lost: \(9,25,30,38\), and 50 . For simplicity, assume a perfect timeout mechanism that detects a lost packet exactly 1 RTT after it is transmitted.

TCP uses a host-centric, feedback based, windows based resource allocation model. How might TCP have been designed to use instead the following models? (a) Host-centric, feedback based, and rate based (b) Router-centric and feedback based

Suppose host A reaches host B via routers R1 and R2: A-R1-R2-B. Fast retransmit is not used, and A calculates TimeOut as \(2 \times\) EstimatedRTT. Assume that the A-R1 and \(R 2-B\) links have infinite bandwidth; the \(R 1 \longrightarrow R 2\) link, however, introduces a 1 -second-per-packet bandwidth delay for data packets (though not ACKs). Describe a scenario in which the R1-R2 link is not \(100 \%\) utilized, even though A always has data ready to send. Hint: Suppose A's CongestionWindow increases from \(N\) to \(N+1\), where \(N\) is R1's queue size.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free