Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that between \(A\) and \(B\) there is a router \(R\). The \(A-R\) bandwidth is infinite (that is, packets are not delayed), but the R-B link introduces a bandwidth delay of 1 packet per second (that is, 2 packets take 2 seconds, etc.). Acknowledgments from \(\mathrm{B}\) to \(\mathrm{R}\), though, are sent instantaneously. \(\mathrm{A}\) sends data to \(\mathrm{B}\) over a \(\mathrm{TCP}\) connection, using slow start but with an arbitrarily large window size. R has a queue size of 1 , in addition to the packet it is sending. At each second, the sender first processes any arriving ACKs and then responds to any timeouts. (a) Assuming a fixed TimeOut period of 2 seconds, what is sent and received for \(\mathrm{T}=0,1, \ldots, 6\) seconds? Is the link ever idle due to timeouts? (b) What changes if TimeOut is 3 seconds instead?

Short Answer

Expert verified
With a 2-second timeout, packets are resent on timeout, causing possible idle periods. With a 3-second timeout, the system can handle delays better, reducing idle periods.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

Identify the elements in the network: Sender (A), Router (R), and Receiver (B). The R-B link introduces a delay of 1 second per packet, while the A-R link has no delay. Router R can hold a maximum of 1 packet in its queue, in addition to the packet it is sending.
02

Initial State and Slow Start Mechanism

At the start (T=0), initialize the TCP slow start process with an initial congestion window size of 1 packet. A sends the first packet to R.
03

Timing Analysis for T=0 to T=2 with 2-Second Timeout

At T=0, A sends packet 1 to R and R immediately sends it to B. At T=1, packet 1 reaches B and B sends an ACK back to A, arriving instantaneously. A responds by sending two packets (due to slow start). At T=2, R sends packet 2 (queued from T=1) to B, and R queues packet 3.
04

Handling TimeOut and Response for T=2 to T=4

At T=2, if no ACKs are received by T=2+2=4, A times out and resends packet 3. At T=3, packet 2 reaches B and B sends an ACK, arriving instantly at A. A processes the ACK and sends packets 4 and 5.
05

Continuing the Analysis for T=4 to T=6

At T=4, packet 3 successfully reaches B and ACK is sent back to A. At T=5, router R sends packet 4 to B and queues packet 5. At T=6, R sends packet 5 to B.
06

Analyzing Link Idle Periods

Review the timeline to find any idle periods. Due to the router's queue and the 2-second timeout, there is potential idle time if ACKs are not received on time, particularly visible around T=4 before acknowledging the successful transmission.
07

Changing TimeOut Period to 3 Seconds

Analyze the scenario with TimeOut set to 3 seconds instead of 2. The changes mostly affect the timeout handling. For example, A waits until T=5 before retransmitting a packet if no ACK is received, reducing the likelihood of idle periods caused by timeout triggers.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Network Delay
The concept of network delay is crucial when understanding TCP communication. In our given scenario, the delay is introduced by the R-B link, where each packet takes one second to travel from the router (R) to the receiver (B). This can be generalized to other network situations where data does not flow instantaneously from sender to receiver.
When data packets are sent across a network, they navigate various routes and encounter different types of delays. These delays can be:
  • Transmission delay: Time taken to push all bits of the packet onto the wire
  • Propagation delay: Time taken for a signal to travel through the medium
  • Processing delay: Time routers take to process packet headers
  • Queueing delay: Time a packet spends waiting in queue before being transmitted
In our case, the R-B link has a constant delay of 1 second per packet. Therefore, if multiple packets are queued, they take multiple seconds to reach their destination. This delay must be accounted for when calculating the timing of events like acknowledgments and timeouts. Understanding and managing these delays is crucial to ensure efficient network performance.
Packet Acknowledgment
Packet acknowledgment is an essential component of TCP's reliable data transfer mechanism. When a receiver (B) successfully receives a packet from the sender (A), it sends back an acknowledgment (ACK) to inform the sender that the packet arrived safely.
In our scenario, acknowledgments are sent instantaneously from B back to A. This means that as soon as B receives a packet, the ACK reaches A without any delay. This instant feedback is crucial for the sender to know whether it should continue sending more packets or if it needs to resend any packets due to errors or losses.
Here's how packet acknowledgment works in our given scenario:
  • At T=1, the first packet reaches B, and an ACK is instantly sent back to A.
  • At T=3, the second packet reaches B, and again an ACK is sent instantly to A.
By receiving ACKs, A updates its understanding of which packets have been successfully delivered and adjusts its transmission strategy accordingly. This mechanism ensures data integrity and helps manage flow control, avoiding congestion in the network.
Timeout Period
The timeout period in TCP is the duration the sender waits for an acknowledgment from the receiver before assuming the packet was lost and resending it. This period is critical in managing the network's reliability and performance.
In our exercise, we explore two different timeout periods: 2 seconds and 3 seconds. Let's examine how they impact the transmission:
  • With a 2-second timeout, if A does not receive an ACK by T=2, it resends the packet. For instance, if no ACK is received by T=4 for the second packet, A resends it.
  • With a 3-second timeout, A waits until T=3 before resending. This longer wait period reduces the chance of unnecessary packet resends due to momentary delays but can introduce idle periods if the ACK arrives just after the timeout.
Choosing an appropriate timeout period is a balancing act. A shorter timeout can lead to unnecessary retransmissions, increasing network load. A longer timeout can create delays, reducing overall network efficiency. Understanding how to set this parameter based on the network's characteristics and delay patterns is key to optimizing TCP performance. In practice, TCP uses an adaptive algorithm to adjust the timeout dynamically, but in academic exercises, fixed periods help illustrate the underlying principles.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It is possible to define flows on either a host-to-host basis or a process-to- process basis. (a) Discuss the implications of each approach to application programs. (b) IPv6 includes a FlowLabel field, for supplying hints to routers about individual flows. The originating host is to put here a pseudorandom hash of all the other fields serving to identify the flow; the router can thus use any subset of these bits as a hash value for fast lookup of the flow. What exactly should the FlowLabel be based on, for each of these two approaches?

Suppose a TCP Vegas connection measures the RTT of its first packet and sets BaseRT to that, but then a network link failure occurs and all subsequent traffic is routed via an alternative path with twice the RTT. How will TCP Vegas respond? What will happen to the value of CongestionWindow? Assume no actual timeouts occur, and that \(\beta\) is much smaller than the initial ExpectedRate.

The text states that additive increase is a necessary condition for a congestioncontrol mechanism to be stable. Outline a specific instability that might arise if all increases were exponential; that is, if TCP continued to use "slow" start after CongestionWindow increased beyond CongestionThreshold.

You are an Internet service provider; your client hosts connect directly to your routers. You know some hosts are using experimental TCPs and suspect some may be using a "greedy" TCP with no congestion control. What measurements might you make at your router to establish that a client was not using slow start at all? If a client used slow start on startup but not after a timeout, could you detect that?

Suppose TCP is used over a lossy link that loses on average one segment in four. Assume the bandwidth \(x\) delay window size is considerably larger than four segments. (a) What happens when we start a connection? Do we ever get to the linearincrease phase of congestion avoidance? (b) Without using an explicit feedback mechanism from the routers, would TCP have any way to distinguish such link losses from congestion losses, at least over the short term? (c) Suppose TCP senders did reliably get explicit congestion indications from routers. Assuming links as above were common, would it be feasible to support window sizes much larger than four segments? What would TCP have to do?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free