Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

During linear increase, TCP computes an increment to the congestion window as Increment \(=\mathrm{MSS} \times(\mathrm{MSS} /\) CongestionWindow \()\) Explain why computing this increment each time an ACK arrives may not result in the correct increment. Give a more precise definition for this increment. (Hint: A given ACK can acknowledge more or less than one MSS's worth of data.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The increment calculation is incorrect because ACKs do not always correspond to one MSS of data. A more accurate increment is \(\frac{\text{MSS} \times \text{BytesAcked}}{\text{CongestionWindow}} \).

Step by step solution

01

- Understand the Given Increment Calculation

The increment given is \(\text{Increment} = \text{MSS} \times \frac{\text{MSS}}{\text{CongestionWindow}} \), where MSS is the Maximum Segment Size and CongestionWindow is the current size of the congestion window. This increment calculation is performed each time an ACK (Acknowledgment) packet is received.
02

- Identify the Issue with the Increment Computation

The problem with computing this increment each time an ACK is received stems from the fact that each ACK does not necessarily correspond to one MSS of data. An ACK could acknowledge more or less than one MSS worth of data, leading to inaccuracies in the increment calculation.
03

- Analyze the Impact of Incorrect ACK-to-MSS Mapping

When an ACK acknowledges more than one MSS worth of data, the increment should be larger, and when less, it should be smaller. The current computation does not account for these variations, potentially leading to an incorrect adjustment of the congestion window size.
04

- Propose a More Precise Definition for the Increment

A more precise definition involves computing the increment based on the actual amount of data acknowledged. The new increment formula can be defined as \(\text{Increment} = \frac{\text{MSS} \times \text{BytesAcked}}{\text{CongestionWindow}} \), where \(\text{BytesAcked}\) is the actual number of bytes acknowledged by the incoming ACK.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

TCP Algorithm
The TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) algorithm is central to ensuring reliable data transmission over networks. It governs how data packets are sent, acknowledged, and managed between sender and receiver. A vital component of the TCP algorithm is congestion control, which prevents network congestion by adjusting the rate of data transmission. This process involves managing a variable called the congestion window (CWND), which dictates how much data can be in transit without being acknowledged. Understanding the TCP algorithm and its steps, such as connection establishment, data transfer, and connection termination, is essential for anyone looking to grasp how data travels across the Internet. By following a set of rules and mechanisms, TCP ensures that data is sent efficiently and errors are corrected, making it a cornerstone of modern networking.
Linear Increase
In TCP congestion control, the linear increase refers to the additive increase of the congestion window (CWND) during the 'congestion avoidance' phase. Unlike the 'slow start' phase, where the CWND grows exponentially, the linear increase phase ensures a more controlled and gradual growth. This helps to stabilize the data flow and prevents sudden spikes in network load. Every time an acknowledgment (ACK) is received, the CWND is increased fractionally based on a computed increment value. This increment calculation ensures that the transmission rate grows smoothly, allowing the network to adapt to varying levels of traffic without becoming overwhelmed. By using this controlled approach, TCP can better handle fluctuating network conditions and avoid congestion collapse.
ACK Mechanism
The ACK (Acknowledgment) mechanism is a critical part of the TCP protocol. When a sender transmits data packets, it expects to receive ACKs from the receiver indicating successful receipt. Each ACK confirms that a specific amount of data has been received correctly, allowing the sender to send more data. This mechanism ensures data integrity and helps in managing the congestion window (CWND). In TCP's congestion control, ACKs play a key role in adjusting the CWND size. Accurate acknowledgment of data packets enables the sender to adjust its transmission rate appropriately. However, the challenge arises because an ACK may not always correspond to exactly one Maximum Segment Size (MSS) of data, leading to potential inaccuracies in CWND adjustments. Ensuring precise increment calculations based on the actual bytes acknowledged can mitigate these issues and improve overall network performance.
Maximum Segment Size (MSS)
The Maximum Segment Size (MSS) defines the largest amount of data, in bytes, that a TCP packet can carry. It is crucial for optimizing the transfer of data across the network. The MSS is typically determined during the TCP handshake and is influenced by the MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) of the underlying network. Choosing an appropriate MSS helps to minimize fragmentation, enhancing efficiency and reducing the likelihood of packet loss. A larger MSS means that more data can be sent in each packet, reducing overhead and improving throughput. However, if the MSS is too large, it could lead to fragmentation if the network's MTU cannot accommodate it. Conversely, a very small MSS would result in higher overhead due to a greater number of packets. Thus, selecting the MSS requires balancing between packet size and network capacity to optimize performance.
Congestion Window
The congestion window (CWND) is a critical parameter in TCP congestion control. It represents the amount of data that can be sent without receiving an acknowledgment (ACK). Initially, during the 'slow start' phase, the CWND increases rapidly to quickly discover the network's capacity. However, as the connection progresses, TCP shifts to the 'congestion avoidance' phase, where the CWND increases linearly to avoid overwhelming the network. The size of the CWND directly impacts data throughput. If the window is too small, the sender may not utilize the network effectively, leading to underutilization. If it's too large, the network could become congested, resulting in packet loss and delays. Precise management of the CWND, including accurate calculation of increments during linear increase, is essential for maintaining optimal network performance. By considering the actual amount of data acknowledged in the increment calculations, TCP can adjust the CWND more accurately, thereby enhancing transmission efficiency and reducing the risk of congestion.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose TCP is used over a lossy link that loses on average one segment in four. Assume the bandwidth \(x\) delay window size is considerably larger than four segments. (a) What happens when we start a connection? Do we ever get to the linearincrease phase of congestion avoidance? (b) Without using an explicit feedback mechanism from the routers, would TCP have any way to distinguish such link losses from congestion losses, at least over the short term? (c) Suppose TCP senders did reliably get explicit congestion indications from routers. Assuming links as above were common, would it be feasible to support window sizes much larger than four segments? What would TCP have to do?

Suppose you are downloading a large file over a 3-KBps phone link. Your software displays an average-bytes-per-second counter. How will TCP congestion control and occasional packet losses cause this counter to fluctuate? Assume that only a third, say, of the total RTT is spent on the phone link.

Suppose host A reaches host B via routers R1 and R2: A-R1-R2-B. Fast retransmit is not used, and A calculates TimeOut as \(2 \times\) EstimatedRTT. Assume that the A-R1 and \(R 2-B\) links have infinite bandwidth; the \(R 1 \longrightarrow R 2\) link, however, introduces a 1 -second-per-packet bandwidth delay for data packets (though not ACKs). Describe a scenario in which the R1-R2 link is not \(100 \%\) utilized, even though A always has data ready to send. Hint: Suppose A's CongestionWindow increases from \(N\) to \(N+1\), where \(N\) is R1's queue size.

Suppose a router's drop policy is to drop the highest-cost packet whenever queues are full, where it defines the "cost" of a packet to be the product of its size by the time remaining that it will spend in the queue. (Note that in calculating cost it is equivalent to use the sum of the sizes of the earlier packets in lieu of remaining time.) (a) What advantages and disadvantages might such a policy offer, compared to tail drop? (b) Give an example of a sequence of queued packets for which dropping the highest-cost packet differs from dropping the largest packet. (c) Give an example where two packets exchange their relative cost ranks as time progresses.

Suppose two hosts \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\) are connected via a router \(\mathrm{R}\). The \(\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{R}\) link has infinite bandwidth; the \(R-B\) link can send one packet per second. \(R\) 's queue is infinite. Load is to be measured as the number of packets per second sent from A to B. Sketch the throughput-versus-load and delay-versus-load graphs, or if a graph cannot be drawn, explain why. Would another way to measure load be more appropriate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free