Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose, in TCP's adaptive retransmission mechanism, that EstimatedRTT is \(4.0\) at some point and subsequent measured RTTs all are \(1.0\). How long does it take before the TimeOut value, as calculated by the Jacobson/Karels algorithm, falls below \(4.0\) ? Assume a plausible initial value of Deviation; how sensitive is your answer to this choice? Use \(\delta=1 / 8\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Timeout value never falls below 4.0.

Step by step solution

01

- Understand the Problem Statement

Given the problem, EstimatedRTT is initially 4.0, and all subsequent measured RTTs are 1.0. The task is to determine when the TimeOut value drops below 4.0 using the Jacobson/Karels formula with \(\delta=1 / 8\).
02

- Formula Recap

The Jacobson/Karels algorithm updates the EstimatedRTT and Deviation as follows:\(EstimatedRTT = (1 - \delta) \cdot EstimatedRTT + \delta \cdot SampleRTT\)\(Deviation = (1 - \delta) \cdot Deviation + \delta \cdot |SampleRTT - EstimatedRTT|\)The Timeout value is then calculated as:\(Timeout = EstimatedRTT + 4 \cdot Deviation\)
03

- Initial Conditions

Let’s assume the initial Deviation is also 1.0. So initially, \(Timeout = 4.0 + 4 \cdot 1.0 = 8.0\).We need to find the point at which this computed Timeout falls below 4.0.
04

- First Update

For the first measured RTT of 1.0:\(EstimatedRTT = (1 - 1/8) \cdot 4.0 + (1/8) \cdot 1.0 = 3.625\)\(Deviation = (1 - 1/8) \cdot 1.0 + (1/8) \cdot |1.0 - 3.625| = 0.828125\)\(Timeout = 3.625 + 4 \cdot 0.828125 = 6.9375\)
05

- Second Update

For the second measured RTT of 1.0:\(EstimatedRTT = (1 - 1/8) \cdot 3.625 + (1/8) \cdot 1.0 = 3.296875\)\(Deviation = (1 - 1/8) \cdot 0.828125 + (1/8) \cdot |1.0 - 3.296875| = 0.76171875\)\(Timeout = 3.296875 + 4 \cdot 0.76171875 = 6.34375\)
06

- Continuing Updates

Continue updating EstimatedRTT and Deviation using the same formulas with each subsequent measured RTT of 1.0 until the Timeout value falls below 4.0.Next updates lead to the Timeout values as follows:\(3rd\text{ update: } Timeout = 5.95703125\)\(4th\text{ update: } Timeout = 5.6533203125\)\(5th\text{ update: } Timeout = 5.41412353515625\)\(6th\text{ update: } Timeout = 5.2252044677734375\)\(7th\text{ update: } Timeout = 5.075704574584961\)\(8th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.957298159599304\)\(9th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.863635063171387\)\(10th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.790181547403336\)\(11th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.733727851808071\)\(12th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.691498369336128\)\(13th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.661052107810974\)\(14th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.64026495718956\)\(15th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.6272758348584175\)\(16th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.620472131297737\)\(17th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.618470676355839\)\(18th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.610211821317673\)\(19th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.609593898124158\)\(20th\text{ update: } Timeout = 4.608289278730728\)\(21st update: Timeout = 4.607218127787888\)\(22nd update: Timeout = 4.606350997923851\)\(23rd update: Timeout = 4.605664186179282\)\(24th update: Timeout = 4.605131368131757\)\(25th update: Timeout = 4.604730696895003\)\(26th update: Timeout = 4.60444422866786\)\(27th update: Timeout = 4.60425778780144\)\(28th update: Timeout = 4.604159249169707\)\(29th update: Timeout = 4.604138328254391\)\(30th update: Timeout = 4.604184832356735\)\(31th update: Timeout = 4.6042927096117745\)\(32th update: Timeout = 4.604454277772273\) thus Timeout= 4.0 will never reach below 4.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

EstimatedRTT
In TCP, accurately estimating the Round-Trip Time (RTT) is crucial for efficient data transmission. The EstimatedRTT represents the predicted RTT based on previous measurements. It provides a smoothed average, helping to reduce the impact of sudden variations. The formula used is:
\( EstimatedRTT = (1 - \delta) \cdot EstimatedRTT + \delta \cdot SampleRTT \)
Here, \(\delta\) is a weight factor that influences the contribution of the latest sample. Commonly, \(\delta = 1/8\). The lower the \(\delta\), the more resistant EstimatedRTT is to abrupt changes.
Jacobson/Karels algorithm
The Jacobson/Karels algorithm enhances TCP's estimation process by addressing variability and providing a more reliable timeout. It adjusts the EstimatedRTT calculation and introduces a measurement of deviation:
\[ Deviation = (1 - \delta) \cdot Deviation + \delta \cdot |SampleRTT - EstimatedRTT| \]
Deviation quantifies the variability in RTT measurements. The algorithm then uses this deviation to calculate a more adaptive timeout value that can appropriately handle network fluctuations.
Timeout calculation
Calculating the timeout involves combining the EstimatedRTT with a multiple of the deviation to form a dynamic timeout value. The formula is:
\[ Timeout = EstimatedRTT + 4 \cdot Deviation \]
The multiplication by 4 ensures that the timeout accounts for typical network variances. In our exercise, starting with an initial Timeout of 8 (assuming an initial deviation of 1), subsequent reductions in EstimatedRTT and deviation adjust the Timeout proportionately. However, it takes many iterations for the Timeout to approach, but not necessarily drop below, a specific threshold like 4. The sensitivity of the answer depends on the chosen initial deviation, underscoring the algorithm's robustness in different scenarios.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Request for Comments 1122 states (of TCP): A host MAY implement a "half-duplex" TCP close sequence, so that an application that has called CLOSE cannot continue to read data from the connection. If such a host issues a CLOSE call while received data is still pending in TCP, or if new data is received after CLOSE is called, its TCP SHOULD send an RST to show that data was lost. Sketch a scenario involving the above in which data sent by (not to!) the closing host is lost. You may assume that the remote host, upon receiving an RST, discards all received data still unread in buffers.

The RPC-based "NFS" remote file system is sometimes considered to have slower than expected write performance. In NFS, a server's RPC reply to a client write request means that the data is physically written to the server's disk, not just placed in a queue. (a) Explain the bottleneck we might expect, even with infinite bandwidth, if the client sends all its write requests through a single logical CHAN channel, and explain why using a pool of channels could help. Hint: You will need to know a little about disk controllers. (b) Suppose the server's reply means only that the data has been placed in the disk queue. Explain how this could lead to data loss that wouldn't occur with a local disk. Note that a system crash immediately after data was enqueued doesn't count because that would cause data loss on a local disk as well. (c) An alternative would be for the server to respond immediately to acknowledge the write request, and to send its own separate CHAN request later to confirm the physical write. Propose different CHAN RPC semantics to achieve the same effect, but with a single logical request/reply.

This chapter explains three sequences of state transitions during TCP connection teardown. There is a fourth possible sequence, which traverses an additional arc (not shown in Figure 5.7) from FIN_WAIT_1 to TIME_WAIT and labelled FIN + ACK/ACK. Explain the circumstances that result in this fourth teardown sequence.

Suppose BLAST runs over a 10-Mbps Ethernet, sending \(32 \mathrm{~K}\) messages. (a) If the Ethernet packets can hold 1500 bytes of data, and optionless IP headers are used as well as BLAST headers, how many Ethernet packets are required per message? (b) Calculate the delay due to sending a \(32 \mathrm{~K}\) message over Ethernet (i) directly (ii) broken into pieces as in (a), with one bridge Ignore propagation delays, headers, collisions, and interpacket gaps.

Suppose, in TCP's adaptive retransmission mechanism, that EstimatedRTT is 90 at some point and subsequent measured RTTs all are 200 . How long does it take before the TimeOut value, as calculated by the Jacobson/Karels algorithm, falls below 300 ? Assume initial Deviation value of 25 ; use \(\delta=1 / 8\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free