Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why TIME_WAIT is a somewhat more serious problem if the server initiates the close than if the client does. Describe a situation in which this might reasonably happen.

Short Answer

Expert verified
TIME_WAIT is more serious if initiated by the server due to port exhaustion, affecting its ability to handle new connections. For instance, a web server closing thousands of connections could run out of ports.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding TIME_WAIT State

TIME_WAIT is a state where a connection is kept open for a period of time after it has been closed, to ensure all data packets have been transmitted and received properly.
02

Server Initiating Close

When the server initiates the close, it enters the TIME_WAIT state. During this period, the port used by the server remains occupied, which can limit the server's ability to handle new connections.
03

Impact on Server

The server being in TIME_WAIT can lead to exhaustion of available ports, affecting the handling of new client connections. This is a more serious issue compared to the client because the server typically handles multiple concurrent connections.
04

Example Scenario

Consider a web server handling thousands of client requests. If the server initiates the close for each connection, it would frequently enter the TIME_WAIT state, rapidly exhausting the available ports and potentially leading to server downtime or connection refusals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

TCP Connection States
In TCP (Transmission Control Protocol), the communication between two devices follows a series of states to establish and terminate a connection. These states include LISTEN, SYN_SENT, SYN_RECEIVED, ESTABLISHED, FIN_WAIT_1, FIN_WAIT_2, CLOSE_WAIT, CLOSING, LAST_ACK, TIME_WAIT, and CLOSED.

Each state plays a specific role in ensuring reliable data transfer. The TIME_WAIT state is particularly important because it ensures any delayed packets are adequately handled before the connection is entirely closed.

When a connection moves into the TIME_WAIT state, it remains there for a duration called the 2MSL (maximum segment lifetime), which is usually around two minutes. This waiting period helps ensure that all data packets have been properly transmitted and received before completely shutting down the connection.
Server Port Exhaustion
Server port exhaustion occurs when a server runs out of available ports to use for new connections. This can create significant problems for server reliability and availability.

When a server initiates the close of a TCP connection and enters the TIME_WAIT state, the port used for that connection remains occupied for the duration of the TIME_WAIT period. Since most servers handle hundreds or thousands of connections simultaneously, having multiple ports in TIME_WAIT can quickly deplete the available ports.

Consequently, the server may struggle to accept new connections, even though it has the capacity to process them because the ports are still tied up.
Examples of situations where this issue may arise include:
  • Heavy traffic on a web server leading to many connections being closed frequently
  • Short-lived tasks that create and close many connections in a short period
  • Stress testing a server with rapid connection opens and closes
Connection Handling in Servers
Managing connections effectively is crucial for server stability and performance. Servers must efficiently handle opening and closing connections to avoid problems like port exhaustion. Here are some strategies for managing connections:
  • Reusing Ports: Servers can reuse ports that are in the TIME_WAIT state under controlled conditions to minimize port exhaustion.
  • Load Balancing: Distributing the load across multiple servers can help ensure no single server is overwhelmed by handling too many connections.
  • Keep-Alive Mechanisms: Instead of closing connections quickly, servers can use keep-alive mechanisms to maintain idle connections for a longer period, reducing the frequency of new connections.
  • Connection Pooling: Reusing a pool of connections for clients instead of opening new ones can also mitigate the impact of TIME_WAIT states.

Effective connection handling ensures that servers remain responsive, can scale well under load, and provide a reliable service to clients.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

TCP's simultaneous open feature is seldom used. (a) Propose a change to TCP in which this is disallowed. Indicate what changes would be made in the state diagram (and if necessary in the undiagrammed event responses). (b) Could TCP reasonably disallow simultaneous close? (c) Propose a change to TCP in which simultaneous SYNs exchanged by two hosts lead to two separate connections. Indicate what state diagram changes this entails, and also what header changes become necessary. Note that this now means that more than one connection can exist over a given pair of \langlehost, port)s. (You might also look up the first "Discussion" item on page 87 of Request for Comments \(1122 .\) )

You are hired to design a reliable byte-stream protocol that uses a sliding window (like TCP). This protocol will run over a 100-Mbps network. The RTT of the network is \(100 \mathrm{~ms}\), and the maximum segment lifetime is 60 seconds. (a) How many bits would you include in the AdvertisedWindow and SequenceNum fields of your protocol header? (b) How would you determine the numbers given above, and which values might be less certain?

When TCP sends a \(\langle\) SYN, SequenceNum \(=x\rangle\) or \(\langle\) FIN, SequenceNum \(=x\rangle\), the consequent ACK has Acknowledgment \(=x+1\); that is, SYNs and FINs each take up one unit in sequence number space. Is this necessary? If so, give an example of an ambiguity that would arise if the corresponding Acknowledgment were \(x\) instead of \(x+1 ;\) if not, explain why.

Consult Request for Comments 793 to find out how TCP is supposed to respond if a FIN or an RST arrives with a sequence number other than NextByteExpected. Consider both when the sequence number is within the receive window and when it is not.

Suppose party A connects to the Internet via a dial-up IP server (e.g., using SLIP or PPP), has several open Telnet connections (using TCP), and is cut off. Party B then dials in and is assigned the same IP address that A had. Assuming B was able to guess to what host(s) A had been connected, describe a sequence of probes that could enable B to obtain sufficient state information to continue with A's connections.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free