Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why TIME_WAIT is a somewhat more serious problem if the server initiates the close than if the client does. Describe a situation in which this might reasonably happen.

Short Answer

Expert verified
TIME_WAIT is more serious if initiated by the server due to port exhaustion, affecting its ability to handle new connections. For instance, a web server closing thousands of connections could run out of ports.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding TIME_WAIT State

TIME_WAIT is a state where a connection is kept open for a period of time after it has been closed, to ensure all data packets have been transmitted and received properly.
02

Server Initiating Close

When the server initiates the close, it enters the TIME_WAIT state. During this period, the port used by the server remains occupied, which can limit the server's ability to handle new connections.
03

Impact on Server

The server being in TIME_WAIT can lead to exhaustion of available ports, affecting the handling of new client connections. This is a more serious issue compared to the client because the server typically handles multiple concurrent connections.
04

Example Scenario

Consider a web server handling thousands of client requests. If the server initiates the close for each connection, it would frequently enter the TIME_WAIT state, rapidly exhausting the available ports and potentially leading to server downtime or connection refusals.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

TCP Connection States
In TCP (Transmission Control Protocol), the communication between two devices follows a series of states to establish and terminate a connection. These states include LISTEN, SYN_SENT, SYN_RECEIVED, ESTABLISHED, FIN_WAIT_1, FIN_WAIT_2, CLOSE_WAIT, CLOSING, LAST_ACK, TIME_WAIT, and CLOSED.

Each state plays a specific role in ensuring reliable data transfer. The TIME_WAIT state is particularly important because it ensures any delayed packets are adequately handled before the connection is entirely closed.

When a connection moves into the TIME_WAIT state, it remains there for a duration called the 2MSL (maximum segment lifetime), which is usually around two minutes. This waiting period helps ensure that all data packets have been properly transmitted and received before completely shutting down the connection.
Server Port Exhaustion
Server port exhaustion occurs when a server runs out of available ports to use for new connections. This can create significant problems for server reliability and availability.

When a server initiates the close of a TCP connection and enters the TIME_WAIT state, the port used for that connection remains occupied for the duration of the TIME_WAIT period. Since most servers handle hundreds or thousands of connections simultaneously, having multiple ports in TIME_WAIT can quickly deplete the available ports.

Consequently, the server may struggle to accept new connections, even though it has the capacity to process them because the ports are still tied up.
Examples of situations where this issue may arise include:
  • Heavy traffic on a web server leading to many connections being closed frequently
  • Short-lived tasks that create and close many connections in a short period
  • Stress testing a server with rapid connection opens and closes
Connection Handling in Servers
Managing connections effectively is crucial for server stability and performance. Servers must efficiently handle opening and closing connections to avoid problems like port exhaustion. Here are some strategies for managing connections:
  • Reusing Ports: Servers can reuse ports that are in the TIME_WAIT state under controlled conditions to minimize port exhaustion.
  • Load Balancing: Distributing the load across multiple servers can help ensure no single server is overwhelmed by handling too many connections.
  • Keep-Alive Mechanisms: Instead of closing connections quickly, servers can use keep-alive mechanisms to maintain idle connections for a longer period, reducing the frequency of new connections.
  • Connection Pooling: Reusing a pool of connections for clients instead of opening new ones can also mitigate the impact of TIME_WAIT states.

Effective connection handling ensures that servers remain responsive, can scale well under load, and provide a reliable service to clients.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The RPC-based "NFS" remote file system is sometimes considered to have slower than expected write performance. In NFS, a server's RPC reply to a client write request means that the data is physically written to the server's disk, not just placed in a queue. (a) Explain the bottleneck we might expect, even with infinite bandwidth, if the client sends all its write requests through a single logical CHAN channel, and explain why using a pool of channels could help. Hint: You will need to know a little about disk controllers. (b) Suppose the server's reply means only that the data has been placed in the disk queue. Explain how this could lead to data loss that wouldn't occur with a local disk. Note that a system crash immediately after data was enqueued doesn't count because that would cause data loss on a local disk as well. (c) An alternative would be for the server to respond immediately to acknowledge the write request, and to send its own separate CHAN request later to confirm the physical write. Propose different CHAN RPC semantics to achieve the same effect, but with a single logical request/reply.

You are hired to design a reliable byte-stream protocol that uses a sliding window (like TCP). This protocol will run over a 1-Gbps network. The RTT of the network is \(140 \mathrm{~ms}\), and the maximum segment lifetime is 60 seconds. How many bits would you include in the AdvertisedWindow and SequenceNum fields of your protocol header?

Consider a simple UDP-based protocol for requesting files (based somewhat loosely on the Trivial File Transport Protocol, TFTP). The client sends an initial file request, and the server answers (if the file can be sent) with the first data packet. Client and server then continue with a stop-and-wait transmission mechanism. (a) Describe a scenario by which a client might request one file but get another; you may allow the client application to exit abruptly and be restarted with the same port. (b) Propose a change in the protocol that will make this situation much less likely.

Consult Request for Comments 793 to find out how TCP is supposed to respond if a FIN or an RST arrives with a sequence number other than NextByteExpected. Consider both when the sequence number is within the receive window and when it is not.

A sender on a TCP connection that receives a 0 advertised window periodically probes the receiver to discover when the window becomes nonzero. Why would the receiver need an extra timer if it were responsible for reporting that its advertised window had become nonzero (i.e., if the sender did not probe)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free