Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose a host wants to establish the reliability of a link by sending packets and measuring the percentage that are received; routers, for example, do this. Explain the difficulty of doing this over a TCP connection.

Short Answer

Expert verified
TCP masks packet loss through retransmissions and acknowledgments, hiding true link reliability. Using simpler protocols like UDP can better measure packet loss.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding TCP

Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is a reliable, connection-oriented protocol that ensures all packets sent are received and acknowledged. Due to its built-in error-checking and retransmission mechanisms, TCP inherently guarantees that all packets will eventually be received, making it difficult to measure lost packets directly with TCP.
02

Packet Loss Concealment

TCP masks packet loss by retransmitting lost packets until they are successfully received. As a result, while TCP provides overall reliable transmission, it does not reveal how many packets were originally lost and retransmitted, hiding the actual link reliability.
03

Acknowledgment and Timing

TCP relies on acknowledgments (ACKs) to confirm packet receipt. Timers and sequence numbers are used to detect lost packets and trigger retransmissions. This means the sender does not differentiate between originally received packets and those that were retransmitted, making direct measurement of packet loss difficult.
04

Impact of Retransmissions

Frequent retransmissions due to packet loss can significantly affect overall transmission time and efficiency. However, TCP's goal is to deliver all packets accurately, not to provide insight into the transmission quality of each original packet, obfuscating the true reliability of the link.
05

Alternative Methods

To measure the link reliability accurately, it would be more effective to use a simpler protocol like UDP (User Datagram Protocol) that does not guarantee delivery and, therefore, allows direct observation of packet loss.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Packet Loss Measurement
Measuring packet loss over a TCP connection can be tricky. TCP has built-in mechanisms to ensure all packets arrive reliably, potentially leading to misleading results about the actual packet loss.
When packets are lost, TCP automatically retransmits them, so the receiving end gets the complete data without ever knowing packets were lost initially.
This makes it hard to measure the real packet loss rate as TCP hides the loss through its retransmission processes.
Retransmission Mechanics
TCP achieves reliability through retransmission mechanics. Whenever TCP detects a lost packet, it retransmits it to ensure the data arrives correctly at the destination.
Here’s a breakdown of how this works:
  • TCP uses sequence numbers: Every packet is assigned a sequence number. This helps in tracking which packet has been lost or requires retransmission.
  • Acknowledgments (ACKs): The receiving end sends back ACKs for packets received. If the sender doesn’t receive an ACK in time, it assumes the packet was lost.
  • Timers: TCP uses timers to detect lost packets. If an ACK isn’t received within a certain period, the sender retransmits the packet.
This robust system ensures data reliability but masks the actual packet loss, hiding the real picture of network reliability.
TCP versus UDP
When it comes to understanding link reliability and packet loss, it’s vital to compare TCP with UDP (User Datagram Protocol). TCP and UDP serve different purposes in network communication:
  • TCP (Transmission Control Protocol): Ensures complete and reliable data transfer. It uses mechanisms like acknowledgment, retransmissions, and sequence numbers to achieve this, but it hides packet loss because it’s focused on ensuring all data arrives successfully.
  • UDP (User Datagram Protocol): Does not guarantee delivery, order, or error-checking. It sends packets without waiting for acknowledgments or retransmitting lost packets. This makes it simpler and faster, but also unreliable for data integrity. However, it allows for direct measurement of packet loss since lost packets are not retransmitted.
If accurately measuring packet loss is the goal, UDP is the better choice, as it does not hide the loss like TCP does through its reliability mechanisms.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose party A connects to the Internet via a dial-up IP server (e.g., using SLIP or PPP), has several open Telnet connections (using TCP), and is cut off. Party B then dials in and is assigned the same IP address that A had. Assuming B was able to guess to what host(s) A had been connected, describe a sequence of probes that could enable B to obtain sufficient state information to continue with A's connections.

Suppose we were to implement remote file system mounting using an unreliable RPC protocol that offers zero-or-more semantics. If a message reply is received, this improves to at-least-once semantics. We define read() to return the specified Nth block, rather than the next block in sequence; this way reading once is the same as reading twice and at-least-once semantics is thus the same as exactly once. (a) For what other file system operations is there no difference between at- leastonce and exactly once semantics? Consider open, create, write, seek, opendir, readdir, mkdir, delete (aka unlink), and rmdir. (b) For the remaining operations, which can have their semantics altered to achieve equivalence of at-least-once and exactly once? What file system operations are irreconcilable with at-least-once semantics? (c) Suppose the semantics of the rmdir system call are now that the given directory is removed if it exists, and nothing is done otherwise. How could you write a program to delete directories that distinguishes between these two cases?

Suppose that, when a TCP segment is sent more than once, we take SampleRTT to be the time between the most recent transmission and the ACK, as in Figure \(5.10\) (b). Assume, for definiteness, that TimeOut \(=2 \times\) EstimatedRTT. Sketch a scenario in which no packets are lost but EstimatedRTT converges to a third of the true RTT, and give a diagram illustrating the final steady state. Hint: Begin with a sudden jump in the true RTT to just over the established TimeOut.

Consider a simple UDP-based protocol for requesting files (based somewhat loosely on the Trivial File Transport Protocol, TFTP). The client sends an initial file request, and the server answers (if the file can be sent) with the first data packet. Client and server then continue with a stop-and-wait transmission mechanism. (a) Describe a scenario by which a client might request one file but get another; you may allow the client application to exit abruptly and be restarted with the same port. (b) Propose a change in the protocol that will make this situation much less likely.

When TCP sends a \(\langle\) SYN, SequenceNum \(=x\rangle\) or \(\langle\) FIN, SequenceNum \(=x\rangle\), the consequent ACK has Acknowledgment \(=x+1\); that is, SYNs and FINs each take up one unit in sequence number space. Is this necessary? If so, give an example of an ambiguity that would arise if the corresponding Acknowledgment were \(x\) instead of \(x+1 ;\) if not, explain why.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free