Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose a host wants to establish the reliability of a link by sending packets and measuring the percentage that are received; routers, for example, do this. Explain the difficulty of doing this over a TCP connection.

Short Answer

Expert verified
TCP masks packet loss through retransmissions and acknowledgments, hiding true link reliability. Using simpler protocols like UDP can better measure packet loss.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding TCP

Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is a reliable, connection-oriented protocol that ensures all packets sent are received and acknowledged. Due to its built-in error-checking and retransmission mechanisms, TCP inherently guarantees that all packets will eventually be received, making it difficult to measure lost packets directly with TCP.
02

Packet Loss Concealment

TCP masks packet loss by retransmitting lost packets until they are successfully received. As a result, while TCP provides overall reliable transmission, it does not reveal how many packets were originally lost and retransmitted, hiding the actual link reliability.
03

Acknowledgment and Timing

TCP relies on acknowledgments (ACKs) to confirm packet receipt. Timers and sequence numbers are used to detect lost packets and trigger retransmissions. This means the sender does not differentiate between originally received packets and those that were retransmitted, making direct measurement of packet loss difficult.
04

Impact of Retransmissions

Frequent retransmissions due to packet loss can significantly affect overall transmission time and efficiency. However, TCP's goal is to deliver all packets accurately, not to provide insight into the transmission quality of each original packet, obfuscating the true reliability of the link.
05

Alternative Methods

To measure the link reliability accurately, it would be more effective to use a simpler protocol like UDP (User Datagram Protocol) that does not guarantee delivery and, therefore, allows direct observation of packet loss.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Packet Loss Measurement
Measuring packet loss over a TCP connection can be tricky. TCP has built-in mechanisms to ensure all packets arrive reliably, potentially leading to misleading results about the actual packet loss.
When packets are lost, TCP automatically retransmits them, so the receiving end gets the complete data without ever knowing packets were lost initially.
This makes it hard to measure the real packet loss rate as TCP hides the loss through its retransmission processes.
Retransmission Mechanics
TCP achieves reliability through retransmission mechanics. Whenever TCP detects a lost packet, it retransmits it to ensure the data arrives correctly at the destination.
Here’s a breakdown of how this works:
  • TCP uses sequence numbers: Every packet is assigned a sequence number. This helps in tracking which packet has been lost or requires retransmission.
  • Acknowledgments (ACKs): The receiving end sends back ACKs for packets received. If the sender doesn’t receive an ACK in time, it assumes the packet was lost.
  • Timers: TCP uses timers to detect lost packets. If an ACK isn’t received within a certain period, the sender retransmits the packet.
This robust system ensures data reliability but masks the actual packet loss, hiding the real picture of network reliability.
TCP versus UDP
When it comes to understanding link reliability and packet loss, it’s vital to compare TCP with UDP (User Datagram Protocol). TCP and UDP serve different purposes in network communication:
  • TCP (Transmission Control Protocol): Ensures complete and reliable data transfer. It uses mechanisms like acknowledgment, retransmissions, and sequence numbers to achieve this, but it hides packet loss because it’s focused on ensuring all data arrives successfully.
  • UDP (User Datagram Protocol): Does not guarantee delivery, order, or error-checking. It sends packets without waiting for acknowledgments or retransmitting lost packets. This makes it simpler and faster, but also unreliable for data integrity. However, it allows for direct measurement of packet loss since lost packets are not retransmitted.
If accurately measuring packet loss is the goal, UDP is the better choice, as it does not hide the loss like TCP does through its reliability mechanisms.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A sender on a TCP connection that receives a 0 advertised window periodically probes the receiver to discover when the window becomes nonzero. Why would the receiver need an extra timer if it were responsible for reporting that its advertised window had become nonzero (i.e., if the sender did not probe)?

You are hired to design a reliable byte-stream protocol that uses a sliding window (like TCP). This protocol will run over a 100-Mbps network. The RTT of the network is \(100 \mathrm{~ms}\), and the maximum segment lifetime is 60 seconds. (a) How many bits would you include in the AdvertisedWindow and SequenceNum fields of your protocol header? (b) How would you determine the numbers given above, and which values might be less certain?

One of the purposes of TIME_WAIT is to handle the case of a data packet from a first incarnation of a connection arriving very late and being accepted as data for the second incarnation. (a) Explain why, for this to happen (in the absence of TIME_WAIT), the hosts involved would have to exchange several packets in sequence after the delayed packet was sent but before it was delivered. (b) Propose a network scenario that might account for such a late delivery.

Suppose an RPC request is of the form "Increment the value of field X of disk block \(\mathrm{N}\) by \(10 \%\)." Specify a mechanism to be used by the executing server to guarantee that an arriving request is executed exactly once, even if the server crashes while in the middle of the operation. Assume that individual disk block writes are either complete or else the block is unchanged. You may also assume that some designated "undo log" blocks are available. Your mechanism should include how the RPC server is to behave at restart.

Suppose party A connects to the Internet via a dial-up IP server (e.g., using SLIP or PPP), has several open Telnet connections (using TCP), and is cut off. Party B then dials in and is assigned the same IP address that A had. Assuming B was able to guess to what host(s) A had been connected, describe a sequence of probes that could enable B to obtain sufficient state information to continue with A's connections.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free