Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

IP hosts that are not designated routers are required to drop packets misaddressed to them, even if they would otherwise be able to forward them correctly. In the absence of this requirement, what would happen if a packet addressed to IP address A were inadvertently broadcast at the link layer? What other justifications for this requirement can you think of?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Dropping misaddressed packets prevents network congestion, security issues, and enhances efficiency by ensuring only properly addressed packets are processed.

Step by step solution

01

- Understand the Requirement

IP hosts that are not designated routers must drop misaddressed packets to prevent improper packet forwarding.
02

- Analyze the Scenario

Consider a packet addressed to IP address A being broadcast at the link layer. The packet might reach multiple devices on the network.
03

- Identify Potential Issues

If the misaddressed packet is not dropped, it could be forwarded by multiple hosts, leading to network congestion or loops.
04

- Discuss Network Security Concerns

Allowing misaddressed packets could expose the network to security vulnerabilities, such as data interception by unauthorized devices.
05

- Consider Network Efficiency

Dropping misaddressed packets improves network efficiency by ensuring that only correctly addressed packets are processed and forwarded.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Network Congestion
Network congestion occurs when the demand for network resources exceeds the available capacity, leading to slower data transmission and potential packet loss. Imagine a situation where a packet intended for IP address A is mistakenly broadcast at the link layer. This packet could reach multiple devices that are not the intended recipients. Since these devices are not designated routers, they should drop the packet. If they do not, each device might try to forward it. This could create multiple copies of the same packet circulating in the network, consuming valuable bandwidth.

The result is network congestion. The more devices forwarding the unwanted packet, the more congested the network becomes. The primary way to prevent this congestion is to ensure that only designated routers forward packets. Non-router devices must drop any packet not specifically meant for them. This policy ensures that the network operates smoothly, with minimal unnecessary data traffic.
Network Security
Network security is crucial for protecting data integrity and preventing unauthorized access. When devices follow the rule of dropping misaddressed packets, it adds a layer of security. Consider this: if a packet is not meant for a particular host but is not dropped, an unauthorized device could intercept and read the packet's contents. This breach of data could lead to multiple security issues, such as data theft or manipulation.

Allowing only designated routers to handle packet forwarding ensures that data travels on a secure path. Unauthorized devices are effectively barred from intercepting misdirected packets, reducing the risk of data interception and misuse. Dropping unknown packets automatically mitigates one of the most straightforward methods for intruding into a network - reading packets not intended for the device in question.

Properly managed networks with secure packet handling protocols ensure that confidential information stays secure and is only viewable by designated and trusted devices.
Network Efficiency
Network efficiency is about maximizing the performance of a network while minimizing resource use. One vital way to achieve network efficiency is through the correct handling of IP packets. Dropping misaddressed packets is a critical step in this process.

If every device on a network tried to forward every packet it received, regardless of whether it was the intended recipient, the network could quickly become overwhelmed with redundant information. This unneeded processing would consume extra CPU cycles and bandwidth.

By ensuring that only correctly addressed packets are forwarded, non-router devices reduce their workload, freeing up resources to handle legitimate data traffic. This streamlined data flow enhances the overall performance and responsiveness of the network.

Efficient networks prioritize correct data handling principles, such as dropping misaddressed packets. This approach leads to a faster, more reliable network where resources are allocated to genuinely meaningful data transmissions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose most of the Internet uses some form of geographical addressing, but that a large international organization has a single IP network address and routes its internal traffic over its own links. (a) Explain the routing inefficiency for the organization's inbound traffic inherent in this situation. (b) Explain how the organization might solve this problem for outbound traffic. (c) For your method above to work for inbound traffic, what would have to happen? (d) Suppose the large organization now changes its addressing to separate geographical addresses for each office. What will its internal routing structure have to look like if internal traffic is still to be routed internally?

Why do you think IPv4 has fragment reassembly done at the endpoint, rather than at the next router? Why do you think IPv6 abandoned fragmentation entirely? Hint: Think about the differences between IP-layer fragmentation and link-layer fragmentation.

Suppose an IP packet is fragmented into 10 fragments, each with a \(1 \%\) (independent) probability of loss. To a reasonable approximation, this means there is a \(10 \%\) chance of losing the whole packet due to loss of a fragment. What is the probability of net loss of the whole packet if the packet is transmitted twice, (a) assuming all fragments received must have been part of the same transmission? (b) assuming any given fragment may have been part of either transmission? (c) Explain how use of the Ident field might be applicable here.

Suppose a TCP message that contains 2048 bytes of data and 20 bytes of TCP header is passed to IP for delivery across two networks of the Internet (i.e., from the source host to a router to the destination host). The first network uses 14-byte headers and has an MTU of 1024 bytes; the second uses 8-byte headers with an MTU of 512 bytes. Each network's MTU gives the size of the largest IP datagram that can be carried in a link-layer frame. Give the sizes and offsets of the sequence of fragments delivered to the network layer at the destination host. Assume all IP headers are 20 bytes.

Let \(A\) be the number of autonomous systems on the Internet, and let \(D\) (for diameter) be the maximum AS path length. (a) Give a connectivity model for which \(D\) is of order \(\log A\) and another for which \(D\) is of order \(\sqrt{A}\). (b) Assuming each AS number is 2 bytes and each network number is 4 bytes, give an estimate for the amount of data a BGP speaker must receive to keep track of the AS path to every network. Express your answer in terms of \(A, D\), and the number of networks \(N\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free