Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose IP routers learned about IP networks and subnets the way Ethernet learning bridges learn about hosts: by noting the appearance of new ones and the interface by which they arrive. Compare this with existing distance-vector router learning (a) for a leaf site with a single attachment to the Internet, and (b) for internal use at an organization that did not connect to the Internet. Assume that routers only receive new-network notices from other routers, and that the originating routers receive their IP network information via configuration.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Ethernet-like learning is dynamic but may cause temporary route instability. Distance-vector routing is stable but relies on periodic updates.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Ethernet Learning Bridges

Ethernet learning bridges learn about hosts by noting the appearance of new ones and the interface by which they arrive. This method is dynamic and requires no manual configuration for discovering new hosts.
02

Understand Distance-Vector Routing

Distance-vector routing protocols enable routers to determine the best path to a destination based on the distance (hop count) to a network. Routers share information with their neighbors to keep the routing tables updated.
03

Scenario Analysis for Leaf Site

For a leaf site with a single attachment to the Internet: With learning similar to Ethernet bridges, when a new IP network is detected, the router will note its interface and share this with neighbors. In existing distance-vector routing, updates with the route's cost are propagated to neighboring routers.
04

Scenario Analysis for Internal Use

For an organization not connected to the Internet: Similar to Ethernet bridges, IP routers will learn about new subnets from arriving traffic and the corresponding interface and share this information internally. With distance-vector routing, internal routers update each other periodically about known routes and their costs.
05

Comparison of Both Methods

Ethernet-like learning involves the detection of new subnets dynamically and route propagation internally. Distance-vector involves periodic updates with route metrics. Bridge-like learning is more immediate but might result in temporary route instability. Distance-vector is more stable but depends on the update interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ethernet learning bridges
Ethernet learning bridges are essential in local area networks (LANs). They help in dynamically learning about network hosts. These bridges do this by observing data packets as they move through the network.

When a host sends data, the Ethernet bridge records the host's address and the port where it arrived. This is how the bridge learns the location of hosts without any manual configuration.

This method ensures a dynamic and adaptable network, reducing the need for manual updates. Ethernet learning bridges make networks more efficient and easier to manage. They are especially useful in automatically adjusting to changes in the network.
Distance-vector routing
Distance-vector routing is a method used by routers to determine the best path to a destination. This method uses hop count as a metric. Each router maintains a table that lists all known paths to various network destinations and the distance to each destination.

Routers regularly share their routing tables with immediate neighbors. They update their own routing tables based on this shared information.

The key benefit of distance-vector routing is its simplicity. However, it may converge slowly and can suffer from routing loops. Solutions like split-horizon and route poisoning help mitigate these issues.

Typically, Routing Information Protocol (RIP) is a well-known example of a distance-vector routing protocol.
IP networks
IP networks form the fundamental structure of the internet. These networks use Internet Protocol (IP) to communicate between devices.

Each device in an IP network has a unique identifier called an IP address. This address ensures data packets can reach the correct destination.

There are two main versions of IP addresses: IPv4 and IPv6. IPv4 addresses are 32-bit numbers, usually represented as four decimal numbers separated by dots. IPv6 addresses, created to solve IPv4 exhaustion, are 128-bit numbers and are represented differently.

IP networks allow different devices across the world to connect and communicate effectively. Understanding how they work is essential for anyone looking to get into networking.
Subnets
Subnets, or sub-networks, are divisions within an IP network. They enhance the efficiency and security of networks.

By dividing a large network into smaller segments, subnets reduce traffic and improve address management. Subnetting helps in allocating IP addresses more efficiently.

A subnet mask is utilized to identify the network and the host portions of an IP address. This mask helps in distinguishing different subnets within an IP network.

Subnetting is crucial for managing larger networks. It enables administrators to better organize and protect their network resources.
Network configuration
Network configuration involves setting up and maintaining network parameters to ensure smooth operation.

Proper configuration ensures efficient data flow and connectivity between devices. Network configuration includes setting IP addresses, subnet masks, default gateways, and DNS servers.

Network administrators often use tools and software to manage these configurations.

Ensuring a correct and updated configuration helps in avoiding issues like IP conflicts and connectivity problems. It is a vital task for maintaining a healthy and secure network.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose host \(\mathrm{A}\) is sending to a multicast group; the recipients are leaf nodes of a tree rooted at A with depth \(N\) and with each nonleaf node having \(k\) children; there are thus \(k^{N}\) recipients. (a) How many individual link transmissions are involved if A sends a multicast message to all recipients? (b) How many individual link transmissions are involved if A sends unicast messages to each individual recipient? (c) Suppose A sends to all recipients, but some messages are lost and retransmission is necessary. Unicast retransmissions to what fraction of the recipients is equivalent, in terms of individual link transmissions, to a multicast retransmission to all recipients?

Suppose hosts \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\) have been assigned the same IP address on the same Ethernet, on which ARP is used. B starts up after A. What will happen to A's existing connections? Explain how "self-ARP" (querying the network on startup for one's own IP address) might help with this problem.

Suppose an IP packet is fragmented into 10 fragments, each with a \(1 \%\) (independent) probability of loss. To a reasonable approximation, this means there is a \(10 \%\) chance of losing the whole packet due to loss of a fragment. What is the probability of net loss of the whole packet if the packet is transmitted twice, (a) assuming all fragments received must have been part of the same transmission? (b) assuming any given fragment may have been part of either transmission? (c) Explain how use of the Ident field might be applicable here.

Some signalling errors can cause entire ranges of bits in a packet to be overwritten by all 0 s or all 1s. Suppose all the bits in the packet including the Internet checksum are overwritten. Could a packet with all 0s or all 1s be a legal IPv4 packet? Will the Internet checksum catch that error? Why or why not?

Suppose most of the Internet uses some form of geographical addressing, but that a large international organization has a single IP network address and routes its internal traffic over its own links. (a) Explain the routing inefficiency for the organization's inbound traffic inherent in this situation. (b) Explain how the organization might solve this problem for outbound traffic. (c) For your method above to work for inbound traffic, what would have to happen? (d) Suppose the large organization now changes its addressing to separate geographical addresses for each office. What will its internal routing structure have to look like if internal traffic is still to be routed internally?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free