Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The IP datagram for a TCP ACK message is 40 bytes long: It contains 20 bytes of TCP header and 20 bytes of IP header. Assume that this ACK is traversing an ATM network that uses AAL 5 to encapsulate IP packets. How many ATM packets will it take to carry the ACK? What if AAL3/4 is used instead?

Short Answer

Expert verified
1 ATM cell for both AAL 5 and AAL 3/4.

Step by step solution

01

- Understand the Problem

The exercise involves determining how many ATM cells are required to transmit a 40-byte IP datagram using two different ATM Adaptation Layers: AAL 5 and AAL 3/4.
02

- Calculate the Number of ATM Cells for AAL 5

AAL 5 typically adds an 8-byte trailer to the IP packet. This makes the total data size 48 bytes (40 bytes of IP datagram + 8 bytes of AAL 5 trailer). Each ATM cell can carry 48 bytes of payload, so only 1 ATM cell is needed to carry the data.
03

- Calculate the Number of ATM Cells for AAL 3/4

AAL 3/4 fragments the IP datagram into multiple ATM cells. Each cell has a payload capacity of 44 bytes due to additional 4-byte protocol overhead. Therefore, the 40-byte IP datagram fits into 1 ATM cell for AAL 3/4 since 40 bytes is less than the 44 bytes payload limit.
04

- Provide the Solutions

For AAL 5, a total of 1 ATM cell is required. For AAL 3/4, also 1 ATM cell is required since the data fits within the maximum payload of a single cell.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

IP datagram
An IP datagram is a basic unit of data in the Internet Protocol (IP). It contains crucial information for routing packets across networks. An IP datagram consists of two main parts:
  • Header: This typically has 20 bytes of data that include source and destination IP addresses, version information, and other routing information.
  • Payload: This is the actual data being transported, which in this case is a packet from the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
An IP datagram allows flexible data transfer across different network types and structures.
TCP ACK
A TCP ACK is an acknowledgment message in the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). When a device receives a TCP packet, it sends back a TCP ACK to confirm receipt. This process is essential for reliable data transmission. In our exercise, the TCP ACK message's IP datagram is 40 bytes long: 20 bytes for the TCP header and 20 bytes for the IP header. The ACK ensures that both parties in a data exchange acknowledge the successful receipt of packets, thus maintaining the integrity of the communication.
ATM Adaptation Layers
Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Adaptation Layers (AALs) are crucial for segmenting and reassembling higher-level packets into ATM cells. These layers ensure seamless data transfer between networks that use different protocols. In this exercise, we focus on two specific types of ATM Adaptation Layers: AAL 5 and AAL 3/4. Each AAL involves different methods to encapsulate data frames into ATM cells, ensuring that IP datagrams can be efficiently transported over the ATM network.
AAL 5
AAL 5 is designed to minimize overhead and is mainly used for handling IP traffic efficiently. Here is a deeper look into AAL 5:
  • Structure: AAL 5 encapsulates the IP packet with an 8-byte trailer, making the total size 48 bytes in our situation.
  • Efficiency: Since each ATM cell can carry a 48-byte payload, a 40-byte IP datagram along with an 8-byte AAL 5 trailer fits perfectly into a single ATM cell.
This makes AAL 5 very efficient as there is no wastage of cell space when transporting the given IP datagram.
AAL 3/4
AAL 3/4 is another method of encapsulating higher-level packets into ATM cells but works differently compared to AAL 5:
  • Structure: AAL 3/4 includes a 4-byte protocol overhead for each cell, reducing the usable payload of each ATM cell to 44 bytes.
  • Fragmentation: The 40-byte IP datagram fits within the 44-byte limit, meaning only one ATM cell is needed for transport.
  • Overhead: Although it handles the IP datagram efficiently, AAL 3/4's structure includes slightly more overhead due to the protocol-specific data included in each cell.
Both AAL 5 and AAL 3/4 ensure the IP datagram is correctly segmented and reassembled, making ATM networks versatile for various data types.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose some repeaters (hubs), rather than bridges, are connected into a loop. (a) What will happen when somebody transmits? (b) Why would the spanning tree mechanism be difficult or impossible to implement for repeaters? (c) Propose a mechanism by which repeaters might detect loops and shut down some ports to break the loop. Your solution is not required to work \(100 \%\) of the time.

Recall that AAL \(3 / 4\) has a CRC-10 checksum at the end of each cell, while AAL5 has a single CRC-32 checksum at the end of the PDU. If a PDU is carried in 12 AAL \(3 / 4\) cells, then AAL \(3 / 4\) devotes nearly four times as many bits to error detection as AAL-5. (a) Suppose errors are known to come in bursts, where each burst is small enough to be confined to a single cell. Find the probability that AAL3/4 fails to detect an error, given that it is known that exactly two cells are affected. Do the same for three cells. Under these conditions, is AAL \(3 / 4\) more or less reliable than AAL.5? Assume that an N-bit CRC fails to detect an error with probability \(1 / 2^{N}\) (which is strictly true only when all errors are equally likely). (b) Can you think of any error distribution in which AAL \(3 / 4\) would be more likely than AAL5 to detect an error? Do you think such circumstances are likely?

Suppose a workstation has an \(\mathrm{I} / \mathrm{O}\) bus speed of \(1 \mathrm{Gbps}\) and memory bandwidth of 2 Gbps. Assuming DMA in and out of main memory, how many interfaces to 45-Mbps T3 links could a switch based on this workstation handle?

In the source routing example of Section 3.1.3, the address received by B is not reversible and doesn't help B know how to reach A. Propose a modification to the delivery mechanism that does allow for reversibility. Your mechanism should not require giving all switches globally unique names.

An Ethernet switch is simply a bridge that has the ability to forward some number of packets in parallel, assuming the input and output ports are all distinct. Suppose two such \(N\)-port switches, for a large value of \(N\), are each able to forward individually up to three packets in parallel. They are then connected to one another in series by joining a pair of ports, one from each switch; the joining link is the bottleneck as it can, of course, carry only one packet at a time. (a) Suppose we choose two connections through this combined switch at random. What is the probability that both connections can be forwarded in parallel? Hint: This is the probability that at most one of the connections crosses the link. (b) What if three connections are chosen at random?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free