Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose some repeaters (hubs), rather than bridges, are connected into a loop. (a) What will happen when somebody transmits? (b) Why would the spanning tree mechanism be difficult or impossible to implement for repeaters? (c) Propose a mechanism by which repeaters might detect loops and shut down some ports to break the loop. Your solution is not required to work \(100 \%\) of the time.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) The transmission will cause a broadcast storm. b) Repeaters lack the intelligence to implement the spanning tree protocol. c) Use unique ID packets to detect loops and shut down ports.

Step by step solution

01

- Analyze the Transmission in a Loop

When somebody transmits in a network with repeaters connected in a loop, the transmitted signal will be amplified and sent around the loop continuously. This will result in a broadcast storm, where the transmission keeps circling the loop indefinitely, leading to network congestion and a potential network collapse.
02

- Explain Spanning Tree Mechanism for Repeaters

The spanning tree algorithm is used to prevent loops in a network by logically disabling some pathways. However, repeaters operate at the physical layer and lack the intelligence required to participate in or execute the spanning tree protocol, which works at the data link layer using bridge protocol data units (BPDUs). Without understanding these protocols, repeaters cannot effectively determine which port to shut down to prevent loops.
03

- Propose a Loop Detection Mechanism

One possible mechanism for repeaters to detect loops could involve sending out unique ID packets periodically. Each repeater would keep track of these packets and their source. If a repeater receives the same unique ID packet on a different port within a specific time frame, it can infer a loop presence. Upon detecting a loop, the repeater can shut down one of its ports to break the loop. This method might not be reliable all the time but could reduce the likelihood of persistent loops.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Broadcast Storm
When a network contains repeaters connected in a loop, transmitting data creates an endless cycle. The original signal is amplified and retransmitted continuously, leading to a phenomenon called a broadcast storm. This is like a feedback loop on a microphone, where sound keeps getting louder.

Broadcast storms can cause serious problems:
  • Network Congestion: The excessive traffic can clog the network, preventing legitimate data from being transmitted.
  • Device Overload: Network devices get overwhelmed by the constant flow of duplicated packets, potentially crashing the system.
  • Performance Degradation: The network becomes extremely slow, making it nearly unusable for regular activities.

Avoiding broadcast storms is crucial to maintain network efficiency and stability. Understanding how they occur prepares you to implement strategies to prevent them.
Spanning Tree Protocol
The Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) is a networking protocol designed to prevent loops in Ethernet networks. It ensures a loop-free topology by selectively blocking some network paths.
  • How It Works: STP uses Bridge Protocol Data Units (BPDUs) to detect network topologies and determine the best paths. When a loop is detected, STP disables the redundant paths, creating a 'spanning tree' that spans the entire network without looping.
  • Limitations with Repeaters: Repeaters operate at the physical layer and do not understand data link layer protocols like BPDUs. This makes them incapable of executing STP, as they lack the necessary 'intelligence' to determine which paths to block.

Therefore, while STP is highly effective in networks with bridges and switches, it is not applicable in networks solely comprised of repeaters. The absence of STP capabilities in repeaters necessitates alternative loop prevention mechanisms.
Loop Detection
Detecting and breaking loops is essential to prevent broadcast storms in networks with repeaters. While STP is not suitable, alternative methods can be used to identify and mitigate loops.
One such mechanism is periodically sending unique ID packets:
  • Sending Out Unique IDs: Repeaters can periodically send unique identifier packets.
  • Tracking IDs: Each repeater tracks the IDs and their source ports. If the same ID packet appears on different ports within a certain timeframe, a loop is likely present.
  • Breaking the Loop: Upon detecting a loop, the repeater can shut down one of its ports to break the cycle and restore normal network operations.

This method, while not foolproof, helps in reducing the likelihood of persistent loops. Implementing loop detection mechanisms in your network infrastructure enhances stability and performance by preventing broadcast storms caused by loops.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the source routing example of Section 3.1.3, the address received by B is not reversible and doesn't help B know how to reach A. Propose a modification to the delivery mechanism that does allow for reversibility. Your mechanism should not require giving all switches globally unique names.

The CS-PDU for AAL 5 contains up to 47 bytes of padding, while the AAL3/4 CSPDU only contains up to 3 bytes of padding. Explain why the effective bandwidth of AAL 5 is always the same as, or higher than, that of AAL.3/4, given a PDU of a particular size.

Propose a mechanism that virtual circuit switches might use so that if one switch loses all its state regarding connections, then a sender of packets along a path through that switch is informed of the failure.

Recall that AAL \(3 / 4\) has a CRC-10 checksum at the end of each cell, while AAL5 has a single CRC-32 checksum at the end of the PDU. If a PDU is carried in 12 AAL \(3 / 4\) cells, then AAL \(3 / 4\) devotes nearly four times as many bits to error detection as AAL-5. (a) Suppose errors are known to come in bursts, where each burst is small enough to be confined to a single cell. Find the probability that AAL3/4 fails to detect an error, given that it is known that exactly two cells are affected. Do the same for three cells. Under these conditions, is AAL \(3 / 4\) more or less reliable than AAL.5? Assume that an N-bit CRC fails to detect an error with probability \(1 / 2^{N}\) (which is strictly true only when all errors are equally likely). (b) Can you think of any error distribution in which AAL \(3 / 4\) would be more likely than AAL5 to detect an error? Do you think such circumstances are likely?

A stage of an \(n \times n\) banyan network consists of \((n / 2) 2 \times 2\) switching elements. The first stage directs packets to the correct half of the network, the next stage to the correct quarter, and so on, until the packet is routed to the correct output. Derive an expression for the number of \(2 \times 2\) switching elements needed to make an \(n \times n\) banyan network. Verify your answer for \(n=8\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free