Logout Open In App
Open In App
Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Chapter 2: Problem 22

Consider an ARQ protocol that uses only negative acknowledgments (NAKs), but no positive acknowledgments (ACKs). Describe what timeouts would need to be scheduled. Explain why an ACK-based protocol is usually preferred to a NAK- based protocol.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Timeouts are scheduled to detect lost packets and depend on RTT. ACK-based protocols are preferred due to their explicit confirmations, improving reliability and efficiency.

Step by step solution

01

- Understanding ARQ Protocols

An Automatic Repeat reQuest (ARQ) protocol is used for error control in data transmission. It ensures that the sender and receiver can communicate reliably even with occasional lost or corrupted packets.
02

- Explaining NAK-based ARQ

In a NAK-based ARQ protocol, the receiver sends a negative acknowledgment (NAK) when it detects an error or a missing packet. This requests the sender to retransmit the erroneous or missing packet.
03

- Scheduling Timeouts

Timeouts are needed to detect lost packets. If the sender does not receive a NAK within a certain time period, it assumes the packet has been received successfully. Scheduling a timeout for the retransmission depends on the network's round-trip time (RTT) and the expected processing delays.
04

- Timeout Calculation

Calculate the timeout interval using RTT estimation. For instance, timeout can be set to a default of two to three times the average RTT to ensure that any packet loss can be detected within a reasonable timeframe.
05

- Comparing ACK-based Protocols

In ACK-based protocols, the receiver sends positive acknowledgments for received packets. The sender will retransmit a packet if it does not receive an ACK within the timeout period. ACK-based protocols are preferred because they explicitly confirm successful receipt, making the detection of lost packets simpler and more reliable.
06

- Conclusion

While NAK-based protocols rely on detecting errors or losses to trigger retransmissions, ACK-based protocols continuously affirm the successful receipt, reducing ambiguity. Thus, ACK-based protocols can enhance reliability and efficiency in communications.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

NAK-based ARQ
Automatic Repeat reQuest (ARQ) protocols are vital in error control for data transmission. One type of ARQ protocol is the NAK-based ARQ. In this approach, the receiver sends a Negative Acknowledgment (NAK) whenever it detects an error or finds a missing packet. The NAK essentially tells the sender to retransmit the specific packet that had issues. This mechanism is reactive since retransmissions only happen after detecting a problem.
Using NAKs helps to control the data flow and ensures that even if a packet gets lost or corrupted, the communication remains intact by requesting a correction.
ACK-based ARQ
Another common ARQ protocol is the ACK-based ARQ. In this method, the receiver sends a Positive Acknowledgment (ACK) after successfully receiving and processing a packet. If the sender does not receive an ACK within a predetermined timeout period, it assumes the packet was lost and retransmits the packet.
ACK-based ARQ provides several benefits over NAK-based ARQ:
  • Guarantees confirmation for each packet received, reducing uncertainty.
  • Improves overall reliability of the data transmission process.
  • Helps quickly detect and correct errors.
This proactive confirmation method often leads to more efficient and reliable data communications.
Timeout Scheduling
Timeout scheduling is crucial for ensuring both NAK-based and ACK-based ARQ protocols function effectively. Timeouts help in detecting lost packets. Here's how you can approach it:
  • Estimate the network's Round-Trip Time (RTT). RTT is the time it takes for a signal to travel from the sender to the receiver and back again.
  • Set your timeout intervals based on this RTT to detect and correct packet loss efficiently.
For example, you might set a timeout to two to three times the average RTT. This approach provides a buffer to account for slight variations in network delays, ensuring timely detection of lost packets without causing unnecessary retransmissions.
Effective timeout scheduling enhances communication reliability, whether using NAK-based or ACK-based ARQ protocols.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that two-dimensional parity provides the receiver enough information to correct any 1-bit error (assuming the receiver knows only 1 bit is bad), but not any 2 -bit error.

Suppose five stations are waiting for another packet to finish on an Ethernet. All transmit at once when the packet is finished and collide. (a) Simulate this situation up until the point when one of the five waiting stations succeeds. Use coin flips or some other genuine random source to determine backoff times. Make the following simplifications: Ignore interframe spacing, ignore variability in collision times (so that retransmission is always after an exact integral multiple of the \(51.2-\mu\) s slot time), and assume that each collision uses up exactly one slot time. (b) Discuss the effect of the listed simplifications in your simulation versus the behavior you might encounter on a real Ethernet.

Coaxial cable Ethernet was limited to a maximum of \(500 \mathrm{~m}\) between repeaters, which regenerate the signal to \(100 \%\) of its original amplitude. Along one \(500-\mathrm{m}\) segment, the signal could decay to no less than \(14 \%\) of its original value \((8.5 \mathrm{~dB})\). Along \(1500 \mathrm{~m}\), then, the decay might be \((0.14)^{3}=0.3 \%\). Such a signal, even along \(2500 \mathrm{~m}\), is still strong enough to be read; why then are repeaters required every \(500 \mathrm{~m}\) ? $$ \begin{array}{l|l} \hline \text { Item } & \text { Delay } \\ \hline \text { Coaxial cable } & \text { propagation speed } .77 c \\ \text { Link/drop cable } & \text { propagation speed .65c } \\ \text { Repeaters } & \text { approximately 0.6 } \mu \text { s each } \\ \text { Transceivers } & \text { approximately 0.2 } \mu \text { s each } \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Suppose you are designing a sliding window protocol for a 1-Mbps point-to- point link to a stationary satellite revolving around the earth at \(3 \times 10^{4} \mathrm{~km}\) altitude. Assuming that each frame carries \(1 \mathrm{~KB}\) of data, what is the minimum number of bits you need for the sequence number in the following cases? Assume the speed of light is \(3 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\). (a) \(\mathrm{RWS}=1\) (b) RWS = SWS

Consider a token ring with a ring latency of \(200 \mu\). Assuming that the delayed token release strategy is used, what is the effective throughput rate that can be achieved if the ring has a bandwidth of \(4 \mathrm{Mbps}\) ? What is the effective throughput rate that can be achieved if the ring has a bandwidth of \(100 \mathrm{Mbps}\) ? Answer for both a single active host and for "many" hosts; for the latter, assume there are sufficiently many hosts transmitting that the time spent advancing the token can be ignored. Assume a packet size of \(1 \mathrm{~KB}\).
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

Computer Network

Read Explanation

Big Data

Read Explanation

Data Representation in Computer Science

Read Explanation

Computer Programming

Read Explanation

Functional Programming

Read Explanation

Data Structures

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free