Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that two-dimensional parity provides the receiver enough information to correct any 1-bit error (assuming the receiver knows only 1 bit is bad), but not any 2 -bit error.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Two-dimensional parity can correct 1-bit errors by detecting incorrect parity rows and columns, which intersect at the erroneous bit, but it cannot correct 2-bit errors due to ambiguity.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Parity Basics

Parity bits are used to detect errors in transmitted data. In two-dimensional parity, a parity bit is added to every row and every column of a data matrix to ensure that the number of 1s is even in each.
02

Correcting 1-bit Error

To correct a 1-bit error, check each row and column parity bit. The row and column with incorrect parity will intersect at the erroneous bit. By identifying the wrong row and column, the exact bit that is in error can be found and corrected by flipping it.
03

Example of 1-bit Error Correction

Consider a 3x3 data matrix with an additional row and column parity bit. If the matrix looks like this before errors: 0 0 1 11 1 0 00 1 1 01 0 0 0 The incorrect matrix might look like this: 0 0 1 11 1 1 00 1 1 01 0 0 0 Here, the second row parity and third column parity do not match, indicating an error at the intersection (2, 3). Correct this by flipping the bit at (2, 3).
04

Why 2-bit Error Cannot Be Corrected

For a 2-bit error, the parity checks will show discrepancies in two rows and columns. This results in four possible locations for errors, creating ambiguity. Flipping one of these bits may not necessarily correct both errors and it is unclear which two bits need flipping.
05

Example of 2-bit Error

If two bits are flipped, the parity will indicate errors in two rows and columns, making it ambiguous as to which bits to correct. The lack of certainty prevents accurate correction of two-bit errors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

error correction
Error correction is a crucial concept in digital communications. It ensures that data is accurately received, even in the presence of errors. When data is transmitted, it can sometimes get corrupted due to noise or other interference. To counteract this, error correction techniques like two-dimensional parity error detection are used. In two-dimensional parity, we add parity bits to both the rows and columns of a data matrix. This way, we can detect and correct single-bit errors effectively. However, it has its limitations; while it can accurately pinpoint and fix a single-bit error, it struggles with multi-bit errors due to overlap in the error indication. For example, when there is a single-bit error, the incorrect row and column parity bits will point to the exact location of the error, making it easy to correct by flipping the bit. If there are two-bit errors, however, the detected errors in multiple rows and columns can create confusion, as it is unclear which bits need changing. This limitation makes two-dimensional parity suitable primarily for single-bit error correction scenarios.
parity bits
Parity bits are special bits added to data transmissions to help detect errors. In a digital data matrix, these bits ensure that the number of 1s in each row and column is even or odd, depending on the specified parity. This simple yet effective technique helps in spotting discrepancies that indicate errors. Two-dimensional parity involves adding an extra parity bit to every row and column of data. This means we get a grid where each row and column checks itself for evenness (for even parity) or oddness (for odd parity). For instance, suppose we have binary data such as this in a matrix:
  • Before parity bit addition: 001, 110, 011

We then add parity bits to ensure each row and column has an even number of 1s:
  • After parity bit addition: 0011, 1100, 0110

Here, each row and column ends up having an even number of 1s. This way, if a single bit error occurs, we can easily spot the incorrect row and column by checking which parity bits don’t match up anymore. However, for two-bit errors within the same row or column, the method falls short as the parity bits might still show an even count, creating ambiguity.
data matrix
A data matrix is a grid used for organizing data in a structured manner, often represented in rows and columns. When dealing with error detection and correction, the data matrix plays a crucial role as it allows us to systematically apply parity bits and identify errors precisely. In two-dimensional parity error detection, each element in the matrix can be a bit of binary data. For example, a 3x3 data matrix might look like this:
  • 0 0 1
  • 1 1 0
  • 0 1 1

We then add a parity bit for each row and each column, resulting in a 4x4 matrix:
  • 0 0 1 | 1
  • 1 1 0 | 0
  • 0 1 1 | 0
  • ------------
  • 1 0 0 0

In this setup, every row and column has an even number of 1s. Now, if one of the bits gets corrupted, the affected row and column’s parity bits will both indicate an error, revealing the exact position of the erroneous bit. For instance, if the element at the second row, third column flips from 0 to 1, the matrix updates to:
  • 0 0 1 | 1
  • 1 1 1 | 1
  • 0 1 1 | 0
  • ------------
  • 1 0 1 0

Here, the second row and third column parity bits change, pointing to an error at the intersection, allowing for easy correction. However, with more than one error, this detection system may become unreliable, as errors compound and blur the clarity of parity signals.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose a \(100-\mathrm{Mbps}\) delayed-release token ring has 10 stations, a ring latency of \(30 \mu \mathrm{s}\), and an agreed-upon TTRT of \(350 \mu \mathrm{s}\). (a) How many synchronous frame bytes could each station send, assuming all are allocated the same amount? (b) Assume stations \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{C}\) are in increasing order on the ring. Due to uniform synchronous traffic, the TRT without asynchronous data is \(300 \mu \mathrm{s}\). B sends a \(200-\mu \mathrm{s}(2.5-\mathrm{Kb})\) asynchronous frame. What TRT will \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}\), and \(\mathrm{C}\) then see on their next measurement? Who may transmit such a frame next?

Suppose you are designing a sliding window protocol for a 1-Mbps point-to- point link to a stationary satellite revolving around the earth at \(3 \times 10^{4} \mathrm{~km}\) altitude. Assuming that each frame carries \(1 \mathrm{~KB}\) of data, what is the minimum number of bits you need for the sequence number in the following cases? Assume the speed of light is \(3 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\). (a) \(\mathrm{RWS}=1\) (b) RWS = SWS

Draw a timeline diagram for the sliding window algorithm with SWS = RWS = 4 frames for the following two situations. Assume the receiver sends a duplicate acknowledgement if it does not receive the expected frame. For example, it sends DUPACK[2] when it expects to see FRAME[2] but receives FRAME[3] instead. Also, the receiver sends a cumulative acknowledgment after it receives all the outstanding frames. For example, it sends ACK[5] when it receives the lost frame FRAME[2] after it already received FRAME[3], FRAME[4], and FRAME[5]. Use a timeout interval of about \(2 \times\) RTT. (a) Frame 2 is lost. Retransmission takes place upon timeout (as usual). (b) Frame 2 is lost. Retransmission takes place either upon receipt of the first DUPACK or upon timeout. Does this scheme reduce the transaction time? Note that some end-to-end protocols (e.g., variants of TCP) use a similar scheme for fast retransmission.

Assuming a framing protocol that uses bit stuffing, show the bit sequence transmitted over the link when the frame contains the following bit sequence: 110101111101011111101011111110 Mark the stuffed bits.

Suppose that we attempt to run the sliding window algorithm with SWS = RWS = 3 and with MaxSeqNum \(=5 .\) The Nth packet DATA[ \(N]\) thus actually contains \(N\) mod 5 in its sequence number field. Give an example in which the algorithm becomes confused; that is, a scenario in which the receiver expects DATA[5] and accepts DATA[0]-which has the same transmitted sequence number-in its stead. No packets may arrive out of order. Note this implies MaxSeqNum \(\geq 6\) is necessary as well as sufficient.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free