Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

One property of addresses is that they are unique; if two nodes had the same address it would be impossible to distinguish between them. What other properties might be useful for network addresses to have? Can you think of any situations in which network (or postal or telephone) addresses might not be unique?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Useful properties include uniqueness, persistence, scalability, and hierarchical structure. Addresses might not be unique in isolated networks with NAT, reused postal codes, or overlapping phone area codes.

Step by step solution

01

Define Useful Properties of Network Addresses

Consider attributes that make network addresses efficient and reliable. Some useful properties include uniqueness, persistence over time, scalability, and hierarchical structure. Unique addresses ensure that each node is identifiable, while persistent addresses ensure stability. Scalability accommodates growth, and hierarchical structure helps in organizing and simplifying management.
02

Discuss Uniqueness

Uniqueness means that no two nodes in a network should have the same address, as it prevents confusion and ensures accurate communication. This property is critical in both digital networks and physical addressing systems like postal services and telephone networks.
03

Consider Situations of Non-Unique Addresses

Identify scenarios where addresses might not be unique. For example, within a local network, non-unique private IP addresses can exist if they are isolated by Network Address Translation (NAT). Similarly, different postal codes can be reused in different regions or countries, and phone number conflicts can occur if area codes overlap or are improperly managed.
04

Address Overlaps and Conflicts

Examine how systems handle overlaps and conflicts. In networks, NAT allows multiple devices to share a single public IP address by mapping individual private IPs. Postal systems resolve conflicts with additional addressing details (like city or region), while telephone networks use additional digits or area codes to ensure uniqueness.

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Address Uniqueness
In any network, whether it's a computer network, telecommunication network, or postal system, the uniqueness of addresses is fundamental. When two or more nodes (e.g., devices or locations) have the same address, it becomes impossible to distinguish between them. This can lead to data being sent to the wrong recipient, or a complete breakdown in communication.

For instance, in a computer network, a unique IP address ensures each device can be accurately located and communicated with. Likewise, in postal systems, every address should be unique within its context (e.g., country or area) to ensure precise delivery of mail.
  • Digital Networks: Each device must have a unique identifier (IP address).
  • Postal Systems: Addresses must be specific enough to direct mail correctly.
  • Phone Networks: Within an area, numbers must be unique to prevent call misrouting.
Maintaining address uniqueness is crucial for the reliability and efficiency of any networking system.
Address Persistence
Address persistence refers to the stability and consistency of an address over time. A persistent address does not change frequently, which can be essential for connections that rely on stable endpoints.

For example, dynamic IP addresses assigned by ISPs may change periodically, but static IP addresses remain the same, providing a stable connection for servers or key network infrastructure.
  • Stability: Persistent addresses ensure reliable connections.
  • Lifetime: Addresses should remain the same for as long as necessary to avoid disruptions.
  • Consistency: Persistent addressing supports ongoing communication without frequent updates.
In postal systems, consistent addresses prevent mail from being lost or delivered incorrectly, while in telephony, maintaining the same number ensures continuous accessibility.
Address Scalability
Scalability is a crucial feature of network address design, as it allows a system to grow without excessive reconfiguration or performance degradation. This is particularly important as the number of devices or locations increases.

For instance, the IPv6 addressing scheme was introduced because the older IPv4 system could not accommodate the growing number of internet-connected devices. The hierarchical nature of IPv6 allows for a vast number of unique addresses, supporting the growth of IoT devices.
  • IPv6: Offers a practically unlimited number of addresses.
  • Hierarchical Allocation: Facilitates organized growth.
  • Flexibility: Supports expansion without overhaul.
Both digital networks and postal or telephony systems need to design their addressing mechanisms with scalability in mind to handle increasing users and devices efficiently.
Hierarchical Address Structure
A hierarchical address structure simplifies the management and organization of addresses by dividing them into segments or levels. This structure helps in both efficient routing and address resolution.

For example, in IP addressing, an address is split into different segments like network and host segments. This hierarchical design makes it easier to manage large networks by subdividing them into smaller, manageable parts. Similarly, telephone numbers often follow a hierarchy, including country codes, area codes, and local numbers.
  • Organization: Hierarchies help in logical structuring and easier management.
  • Efficient Routing: Streamlines the process of finding a route to the destination address.
  • Segmented Management: Facilitates control over different areas or sections independently.
In postal systems, this could be seen in the form of country codes, postal codes, and street addresses, all of which help in accurately delivering mail to its intended recipient.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Calculate the total time required to transfer a \(1000-\mathrm{KB}\) file in the following cases, assuming an RTT of \(100 \mathrm{~ms}\), a packet size of \(1 \mathrm{~KB}\) and an initial \(2 \times\) RTT of "handshaking" before data is sent. (a) The bandwidth is \(1.5 \mathrm{Mbps}\), and data packets can be sent continuously. (b) The bandwidth is \(1.5 \mathrm{Mbps}\), but after we finish sending each data packet we must wait one RTT before sending the next. (c) The bandwidth is "infinite," meaning that we take transmit time to be zero, and up to 20 packets can be sent per RTT. (d) The bandwidth is infinite, and during the first RTT we can send one packet \(\left(2^{1-1}\right)\), during the second RTT we can send two packets \(\left(2^{2-1}\right)\), during the third we can send four \(\left(2^{3-1}\right)\), and so on. (A justification for such an exponential increase will be given in Chapter \(6 .)\)

Discuss the relative performance needs of the following applications, in terms of average bandwidth, peak bandwidth, latency, jitter, and loss tolerance: (a) File server (b) Print server (c) Digital library (d) Routine monitoring of remote weather instruments (e) Voice (f) Video monitoring of a waiting room (g) Television broadcasting

Suppose that a certain communications protocol involves a per-packet overhead of 100 bytes for headers and framing. We send 1 million bytes of data using this protocol; however, one data byte is corrupted and the entire packet containing it is thus lost. Give the total number of overhead + loss bytes for packet data sizes of \(1000,5000,10,000\), and 20,000 bytes. Which size is optimal?

Consider a closed-loop network (e.g., token ring) with bandwidth \(100 \mathrm{Mbps}\) and propagation speed of \(2 \times 10^{8} \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\). What would the circumference of the loop be to exactly contain one 250 -byte packet, assuming nodes do not introduce delay? What would the circumference be if there was a node every \(100 \mathrm{~m}\), and each node introduced 10 bits of delay?

Suppose hosts A and B are connected by a link. Host A continuously transmits the current time from a high-precision clock, at a regular rate, fast enough to consume all the available bandwidth. Host \(\mathrm{B}\) reads these time values and writes them each paired with its own time from a local clock synchronized with A's. Give qualitative examples of B's output assuming the link has (a) high bandwidth, high latency, low jitter (b) low bandwidth, high latency, high jitter (c) high bandwidth, low latency, low jitter, occasional lost data For example, a link with zero jitter, a bandwidth high enough to write on every other clock tick, and a latency of 1 tick might yield something like \((0000,0001)\), \((0002,0003),(0004,0005)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free