Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Can you “decrypt” a hash of a message to get the original message? Explain your answer

Short Answer

Expert verified
You cannot decrypt a hash back to the original message due to the one-way nature of hash functions.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Hash Functions

A hash function takes an input (or message) and converts it into a fixed-size string of characters, which is typically a seemingly random sequence of numbers and letters. The output is called a hash, hash value, or message digest.
02

Properties of Hash Functions

A crucial property of hash functions is that they are one-way functions. This means it is computationally infeasible to reverse the process, i.e., to derive the original input from its hash value.
03

Irreversibility of Hashes

Due to the one-way nature of hash functions, there is no algorithmic method available to reverse the hashing process to retrieve the original message from the hash.
04

Understanding Collisions and Birthday Paradox

While it is possible for different messages to produce the same hash (called a collision), this does not imply decryption. Finding such a collision is extremely unlikely and computationally intense, leveraging the ‘Birthday Paradox’ to exploit hash functions’ weaknesses.
05

Conclusion

Decrypting a message from its hash is not feasible as hash functions are designed to ensure that their output doesn't reveal any information about the input, under security assumptions typical with well-designed hash functions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

One-way Functions
Hash functions are a fascinating aspect of cryptography, primarily because they behave as one-way functions. This means they convert a message into a hash value, but going back from the hash value to the original message is practically impossible. One-way functions are designed to provide an irreversible encryption process because:
  • The operation's nature makes guessing the original input extremely difficult if not practically impossible.
  • There's no straightforward way or efficient method that reverses this hashing process.
This one-way characteristic is known as being computationally infeasible. Even if you had vast computational resources, the time and effort required to reverse a hash to find the original input would be astronomical. In cryptography, these functions serve as a backbone for secure data transmission, ensuring that sensitive information remains protected during transactions.
Hash Collisions
Although hash functions are adept at securing data, they are not entirely invincible. A phenomenon known as hash collision occurs when two different inputs produce the same hash value. This might sound like a flaw, but hash functions are designed to minimize such instances. The interesting part is that a collision doesn't mean we can uncover the original messages.
  • Instead, they arise because the hash values are typically shorter than the possible number of unique inputs, like fitting infinite possibilities into a finite range.
  • Creating a collision isn't as straightforward as it sounds; it requires immense processing power and time.
Despite theoretical vulnerabilities, this complexity keeps hash collisions from being a significant risk in everyday applications. Security-conscious algorithms ensure it remains practically unfeasible to exploit these situations.
Message Digest
A hash function transforms an input into a fixed-length string of characters known as a message digest. This digest serves as a unique identifier for the data, somewhat like a digital fingerprint. Understanding message digests can be broken down into:
  • Consistency: A specific input will always yield the same message digest.
  • Uniqueness: Ideally, different inputs should produce different digests.
  • Efficiency: Generating a digest is quick and resource-light.
This makes message digests fundamental in verifying data integrity. They provide confidence that a message hasn't been altered, making them crucial in signature validations and password storage. The property of having fixed-length outputs ensures that even if the input size changes, the digest remains predictable and manageable.
Birthday Paradox
The Birthday Paradox is a fascinating probability theory that significantly impacts hash functions. It states that in a group, the chances of two people sharing a birthday are surprisingly high when considering average expectations. This paradox extends to hash functions:
  • The more hash values created, the higher the chance of encountering a hash collision.
  • Surprisingly, not every collision requires a complete scan of all inputs, parallel to how not every person needs to be compared to identify shared birthdays.
In practice, this means that as you hash more data, the probability increases that two different inputs will eventually share the same hash value, akin to the birthday paradox. It guides developers to choose sufficiently large hash sizes, maintaining security and reducing collision chances effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the BitTorrent P2P file distribution protocol (see Chapter 2), the seed breaks the file into blocks, and the peers redistribute the blocks to each other. Without any protection, an attacker can easily wreak havoc in a torrent by masquerading as a benevolent peer and sending bogus blocks to a small subset of peers in the torrent. These unsuspecting peers then redistribute the bogus blocks to other peers, which in turn redistribute the bogus blocks to even more peers. Thus, it is critical for BitTorrent to have a mechanism that allows a peer to verify the integrity of a block, so that it doesn’t redistribute bogus blocks. Assume that when a peer joins a torrent, it initially gets a .torrent file from a fully trusted source. Describe a simple scheme that allows peers to verify the integrity of blocks.

Provide a filter table and a connection table for a stateful firewall that is as restrictive as possible but accomplishes the following: a. Allows all internal users to establish Telnet sessions with external hosts. b. Allows external users to surf the company Web site at 222.22.0.12. c. But otherwise blocks all inbound and outbound traffic. The internal network is 222.22/16. In your solution, suppose that the connection table is currently caching three connections, all from inside to outside. You’ll need to invent appropriate IP addresses and port numbers.

Suppose n = 10,000, a = 10,023, and b = 10,004. Use an identity of modular arithmetic to calculate in your head (a • b) mod n.

Suppose Alice wants to visit the Web site activist.com using a TOR-like service. This service uses two non-colluding proxy servers, Proxy1 and Proxy2. Alice first obtains the certificates (each containing a public key) for Proxy1 and Proxy2 from some central server. Denote K1 +( ), K2 +( ), K1 –( ), and K2 –( ) for the encryption/decryption with public and private RSA keys. a. Using a timing diagram, provide a protocol (as simple as possible) that enables Alice to establish a shared session key S1 with Proxy1. Denote S1(m) for encryption/decryption of data m with the shared key S1. b. Using a timing diagram, provide a protocol (as simple as possible) that allows Alice to establish a shared session key S2 with Proxy2 without revealing her IP address to Proxy2. c. Assume now that shared keys S1 and S2 are now established. Using a timing diagram, provide a protocol (as simple as possible and not using public-key cryptography) that allows Alice to request an html page from activist.com without revealing her IP address to Proxy2 and without revealing to Proxy1 which site she is visiting. Your diagram should end with an HTTP request arriving at activist.com.

What is the purpose of a nonce in an end-point authentication protocol?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free