Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a virtual-circuit network. Suppose the VC number is an 8-bit field. a. What is the maximum number of virtual circuits that can be carried over a link? b. Suppose a central node determines paths and VC numbers at connection setup. Suppose the same VC number is used on each link along the VC's path. Describe how the central node might determine the VC number at connection setup. Is it possible that there are fewer VCs in progress than the maximum as determined in part (a) yet there is no common free VC number? c. Suppose that different VC numbers are permitted in each link along a VC's path. During connection setup, after an end-to-end path is determined, describe how the links can choose their VC numbers and configure their forwarding tables in a decentralized manner, without reliance on a central node.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 256 virtual circuits. b. Yes, due to uncoordinated VC allocation. c. Each link independently chooses a free VC number from its own table.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Maximum Number of Virtual Circuits

The VC number is an 8-bit field, meaning it can represent any number from 0 to 255, inclusive. This results in a total of \( 2^8 = 256 \) possible VC numbers. Thus, the maximum number of virtual circuits that can be carried over a link is 256.
02

Understanding Central Node VC Number Allocation

In a central node-controlled setup, the paths and corresponding VC numbers are determined at the outset. The central node ensures that each link in the virtual circuit uses the same VC number. The central node can maintain a table of active VC numbers for each link and assign the lowest available VC number for any new connection. If the system is not fully utilizing all possible VC numbers (the 256 theoretical maximum), it is still possible to run out of common free VC numbers if VC numbers were not consistently reclaimed after use, since each link along the path might have different sets of already used VC numbers.
03

Decentralized VC Number Allocation

In a decentralized system, upon determining an end-to-end path, each intermediate link independently selects an available VC number for its segment. Typically, each link maintains its own table of currently active VC numbers and selects any free number for new connections. For consistent routing, this number is added to the link's forwarding table with information on the incoming and outgoing interfaces. This setup allows flexibility since each link has control over VC numbers, potentially accommodating more circuits than in the centralized scheme.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Centralized VC Number Allocation
In a virtual circuit network, centralized VC number allocation involves a central node determining and managing the virtual circuit (VC) numbers. When a connection is initiated, the central node calculates a path for the connection and assigns a single VC number to be used across all links along this path.

The process works as follows:
  • When a connection request comes in, the central node finds a suitable route through the network.
  • The node checks its database of currently active VC numbers for each link.
  • It assigns the lowest available VC number that is free across all links in the circuit's path.
However, this method may face challenges. Even when the network is not using all 256 potential VC numbers (as determined by an 8-bit field), inconsistencies in reclaiming used VC numbers can lead to scenarios where no single VC number is available on every link, despite there being room for more circuits overall. This inefficiency requires careful management of VC resources to ensure maximum utilization.
Decentralized VC Number Allocation
In contrast to a centralized system, decentralized VC number allocation allows each network link to independently select its VC number when establishing a connection. This approach provides flexibility and can increase the total number of circuits accommodated by the network.

Here's how decentralized allocation typically works:
  • Once an end-to-end path is determined, each link along the path independently assigns a free VC number.
  • Each link maintains its own table of active VC numbers, ensuring it selects an unused number.
  • After selection, the VC number is added to the link's forwarding table, which includes the information about the interfaces involved in the circuit.
This method does not rely on a single point of decision-making, reducing the potential bottlenecks associated with centralized systems. It also enables more dynamic and efficient use of available VC numbers, as each link adapts to its individual load and congestion level, potentially allowing more virtual circuits to be established.
Maximum Virtual Circuits
The maximum number of virtual circuits in a network depends on the size of the VC number field. For example, if we have an 8-bit field, this means the VC numbers can range from 0 to 255.

Mathematically, this is calculated as \(2^8\), which equals 256 possible VC numbers. Thus, each link in the network can theoretically support up to 256 simultaneous virtual circuits.

Achieving this theoretical maximum requires careful management of VC resources, especially in centralized systems where a common VC number must be available across all links in a path. In decentralized systems, the maximum is potentially higher due to the independent management of VC numbers by each link, allowing for greater flexibility and adaptability across the network.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describe some hypothetical services that the network layer can provide to a single packet. Do the same for a flow of packets. Are any of your hypothetical services provided by the Internet's network layer? Are any provided by ATM's CBR service model? Are any provided by ATM's ABR service model?

Describe how packet loss can occur at output ports. Can this loss be prevented by increasing the switch fabric speed?

In this question, we consider some of the pros and cons of virtual-circuit and datagram networks. a. Suppose that routers were subjected to conditions that might cause them to fail fairly often. Would this argue in favor of a VC or datagram architecture? Why? b. Suppose that a source node and a destination require that a fixed amount of capacity always be available at all routers on the path between the source and destination node, for the exclusive use of traffic flowing between this source and destination node. Would this argue in favor of a VC or datagram architecture? Why? c. Suppose that the links and routers in the network never fail and that routing paths used between all source/destination pairs remains constant. In this scenario, does a VC or datagram architecture have more control traffic overhead? Why?

Suppose there are three routers between a source host and a destination host. Ignoring fragmentation, an IP datagram sent from the source host to the destination host will travel over how many interfaces? How many forwarding tables will be indexed to move the datagram from the source to the destination?

What are the roles played by the IGMP protocol and a wide-area multicas routing protocol?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free