Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why is it that voice and video traffic is often sent over TCP rather than UDP in today's Internet? (Hint: The answer we are looking for has nothing to do with TCP's congestion-control mechanism.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Voice and video traffic is now frequently sent over TCP for increased reliability, security, and improved handling of data order and loss.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding TCP and UDP

TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) and UDP (User Datagram Protocol) are two different transport layer protocols. TCP is connection-oriented, ensuring all data is received accurately and in order, while UDP is connectionless and does not guarantee delivery. Video and voice streaming traditionally use UDP for its low-latency benefits, since speed is prioritized over accuracy.
02

Evaluate Requirements of Modern Applications

Modern video and voice applications often require not just fast delivery, but also data reliability and network adaptation capabilities. These applications frequently need to account for packet loss, order, and error recovery, which are inherently better managed by TCP's architecture.
03

Assess TCP Functionality in Media Streaming

Recently, TCP's ability to handle packet loss and data ordering has been leveraged by new technologies that can work within protocol constraints to provide a stable streaming experience. Implementations capitalize on TCP's strengths, rather than solely its traditional use cases.
04

Consider Network Constraints and Solutions

Improvements in network bandwidth and processing have reduced TCP's latency issues that made it undesirable for real-time applications in the past. This allows current streaming methods to use TCP to provide a better overall media experience without significant latency issues.
05

Explore Security and Compatibility

TCP offers enhanced security capabilities over UDP, which is critical in an environment where data breaches are increasingly common. TCP's widespread adoption ensures better compatibility and fewer connection issues with diverse networks and devices.
06

Conclusion

Voice and video are often sent over TCP in modern applications because TCP enhances reliability, provides better data management features, aligns with improved network capabilities, and offers advanced security options, addressing the requirements of today's applications.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

transport layer protocols
TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) and UDP (User Datagram Protocol) are the backbone transport layer protocols essential for managing data transmission across the internet. Each serves a different purpose in ensuring data successfully moves from point A to point B.
TCP is known for being connection-oriented. This means it establishes a connection before transmitting data, ensuring that packets arrive in order and without errors. It achieves this through mechanisms such as acknowledgment packets and retransmission of lost packets. As a result, TCP is highly reliable, even though it sometimes introduces latency due to these checks.
On the other hand, UDP is connectionless. It sends data without setting up a dedicated end-to-end connection, making it faster than TCP but less reliable in terms of accuracy of delivery. It doesn't reorder packets or send acknowledgments.
  • TCP: Connection-oriented, reliable, error-checked, ordered.
  • UDP: Connectionless, faster, out-of-order, no error correction.
media streaming applications
In the realm of media streaming applications, the choice between TCP and UDP becomes a balancing act between speed and reliability. Streaming platforms such as Netflix or Spotify require seamless delivery of content, which often leans towards speed and efficiency.
Initially, UDP was favored for streaming due to its low-latency characteristics. It prioritized speed over reliability because a slight delay or loss of data packets in media was considered tolerable compared to the interruptions caused by buffering.
However, modern streaming has evolved. The expectation is for high reliability alongside quick access. Results have shown improvement in streaming through TCP, thanks to advanced technologies that optimize for TCP’s strengths without compromising on speed significantly.
  • Early preference: UDP for lower latency and speed.
  • Current trends: Increasing use of TCP for improving reliability by handling packet loss and maintaining order.
network compatibility
Network compatibility is crucial for seamless streaming experiences. As technology advances, the ecosystems of devices and network infrastructures become more diverse, demanding consistent connectivity solutions.
TCP shines with its strong network compatibility due to its universal adoption across different platforms and devices. Its ability to handle complex interactions within various network types makes it the preferred choice for developers who aim for wide accessibility of their media applications.
Compatibility issues can arise with UDP because not all networks support its traffic equally well. Thus, while UDP still has niche uses in some real-time situations like gaming, TCP’s compatibility often trumps in commercial media streaming.
  • TCP benefits: Widespread support, fewer compatibility issues, adaptable to varied networks.
  • UDP limitations: Less support in certain networks, may lead to connectivity issues.
data reliability
When it comes to data reliability, TCP is the clear winner. Ensuring all packets arrive intact and in sequence is invaluable for many streaming applications where audio and video need perfect synchronization.
This reliability is achieved through TCP’s core mechanisms of retransmission and acknowledgment. It means applications can recover from errors without disrupting the user experience.
UDP’s lack of these features means it cannot ensure data completeness or correct ordering, making it less suitable when reliability is a key requirement.
  • TCP strengths: Retransmission, packet order preservation, error recovery.
  • UDP weaknesses: No inherent error checking or recovery, higher chances of packet loss affecting quality.
streaming technologies
Streaming technologies have evolved remarkably, incorporating sophisticated techniques to optimize transport layer protocol usage and meet user demands.
New algorithms and network strategies allow media applications to mitigate TCP’s latency, previously a hurdle for live or on-demand streaming. Technologies like MPEG-DASH (Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP) and HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) enhance the streaming experience by leveraging TCP’s robust features.
These streaming technologies allow for adaptive bit-rate streaming, adjusting video quality dynamically based on network conditions without user interruption. This adaptability harnesses TCP’s data control features to ensure smooth, high-quality playback, even under fluctuating network conditions.
  • Technologies: MPEG-DASH, HLS utilizing TCP's advantages.
  • Adaptive streaming: Ensures continuous playback by adjusting to dynamic network conditions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

UDP and TCP use 1s complement for their checksums. Suppose you have the following three 8-bit bytes: \(01010011,01100110,01110100\). What is the \(1 \mathrm{~s}\) complement of the sum of these 8-bit bytes? (Note that although UDP and TCP use 16-bit words in computing the checksum, for this problem you are being asked to consider 8-bit sums.) Show all work. Why is it that UDP takes the Is complement of the sum; that is, why not just use the sum? With the 1 s complement scheme, how does the receiver detect errors? Is it possible that a 1-bit error will go undetected? How about a 2-bit error?

Consider sending a large file from a host to another over a TCP connection that has no loss. a. Suppose TCP uses AIMD for its congestion control without slow start. Assuming cwnd increases by 1 MSS every time a batch of ACKs is received and assuming approximately constant round-trip times, how long does it take for cwnd increase from 6 MSS to 12 MSS (assuming no loss events)? b. What is the average throughout (in terms of MSS and RTT) for this connection up through time \(=6\) RTT?

Consider two network entities, \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\), which are connected by a perfect bidirectional channel (i.e., any message sent will be received correctly; the channel will not corrupt, lose, or re-order packets). A and B are to deliver data messages to each other in an alternating manner: First, A must deliver a message to \(\mathrm{B}\), then \(\mathrm{B}\) must deliver a message to \(\mathrm{A}\), then \(\mathrm{A}\) must deliver a message to \(\mathrm{B}\) and so on. If an entity is in a state where it should not attempt to deliver a message to the other side, and there is an event like rdt_send (data) call from above that attempts to pass data down for transmission to the other side, this call from above can simply be ignored with a call to rdt_unable_to_send (data), which informs the higher layer that it is currently not able to send data. [Note: This simplifying assumption is made so you don't have to worry about buffering data.] Draw a FSM specification for this protocol (one FSM for A, and one FSM for B!). Note that you do not have to worry about a reliability mechanism here; the main point of this question is to create a FSM specification that reflects the synchronized behavior of the two entities. You should use the following events and actions that have the same meaning as protocol rdt \(1.0\) in Figure 3.9: rdt_send(data), packet = make_pkt(data), udt_send (packet), rdt_rcv (packet), extract (packet, data), deliver_data (data). Make sure your protocol reflects the strict alternation of sending between \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\). Also, make sure to indicate the initial states for A and B in your FSM descriptions.

Suppose that the UDP receiver computes the Internet checksum for the received UDP segment and finds that it matches the value carried in the checksum field. Can the receiver be absolutely certain that no bit errors have occurred? Explain.

In protocol rdt3. 0 , the ACK packets flowing from the receiver to the sender do not have sequence numbers (although they do have an ACK field that contains the sequence number of the packet they are acknowledging). Why is it that our ACK packets do not require sequence numbers?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free