Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Hall’s theorem. Returning to the matchmaking scenario of Section 7.3, suppose we have a bipartite graph with boys on the left and an equal number of girls on the right. Hall’s theorem says that there is a perfect matching if and only if the following condition holds: any subset sof boys is connected to at least |s|girls.

Prove this theorem. (Hint: The max-flow min-cut theorem should be helpful.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Hall’s theorem is proved by the contradiction of perfect matching.

Step by step solution

01

Explain Bipartite matching

Bipartite matching checks for the perfect matches between the edges between the set of boys and girls. Perfect matching occurs if and only if the number of flows size equals the number of couples.

02

Prove the Hall’s Theorem.

Consider the bipartite graph G with a set A of boys and a set B of girls in equal number. The subset of boys and girls is denoted by s. Consider that the perfect matching exits, then XA, there exists a subset that is connected to at least |s|girls. For a contradiction, assume that there is no perfect matching.

Consider the modified graph G, equal to G. In Gadd a source vertex sconnected to every vertex in A , and a sink vertex t connected to every vertex in B. Let fbe the maximum flow in G. Since there is no perfect matching in G, f|A|1. By the max-flow min-cut theorem, the minimum cut Xmust have fewer than |A|1cut edges.

Every one of the vertices in AXcontributes at least one cut edge to inx, NA|<|Aviolate the Hall’s condition.

Therefore, by the proof by contradiction, the theorem is proved.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A quadratic programming problem seeks to maximize a quadratic objective function (with terms like 3x12or5x1x2) subject to a set of linear constraints. Give an example of a quadratic program in two variables x1, x2 such that the feasible region is nonempty and bounded, and yet none of the vertices of this region optimize the (quadratic) objective.

Find necessary and sufficient conditions on the reals a and b under which the linear program

maxx+yax+by1x,y0

(a) Is infeasible.

(b) Is unbounded.

(c) Has a unique optimal solution.

You are given the following points in the plane:

(1,3),(2,5),(3,7),(5,11),(7,14),(8,15),(10,19)

.You want to find a lineax+by=c that approximately passes through these points (no line is a perfect fit). Write a linear program (you don’t need to solve it) to find the line that minimizes the maximum absolute error,max1i7|axi+byic|

Question: Consider the following simple network with edge capacities as shown.

a) Show that, if the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm is run on this graph, a careless choice of updates might cause it to take 1000iterations. Imagine if the capacities were a million instead of 1000.

We will now find a strategy for choosing paths under which the algorithm is guaranteed to terminate in a reasonable number of iterations.

Consider an arbitrary directed network (G=V,E,s,t,ce)in which we want to find the maximum flow.Assume for simplicity that all edge capacities are at least 1, and define the capacity of an s - t path to be the smallest capacity of its constituent edges. The fattest path from s to t is the path with the most capacity.

b) Show that the fattest s - t path in a graph can be computed by a variant of Dijkstra’s algorithm.

c) Show that the maximum flow in Gis the sum of individual flows along at most|E|paths from s to t.

d) Now show that if we always increase flow along the fattest path in the residual graph, then the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm will terminate in at mostO(ElogF) iterations, where F is the size of the maximum flow. (Hint: It might help to recall the proof for the greedy set cover algorithm in Section 5.4.)

In fact, an even simpler rule—finding a path in the residual graph using breadth-first search— guarantees that atO(V.E)most iterations will be needed.

In a particular network G = (V, E) whose edges have integer capacities ce, we have already found the maximum flow f from node to node t. However, we now find out that one of the capacity values we used was wrong: for edge (u, v) we used cuv whereas it should have been cuv. -1 This is unfortunate because the flow f uses that particular edge at full capacity: f = c.

We could redo the flow computation from scratch, but there’s a faster way. Show how a new optimal flow can be computed inO(|V|+|E|) time.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free