Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Find the value of the game specified by the following payoff matrix.

00110121111110011203111103210211

(Hint: Consider the mixed strategies (13,0,0,12,16,0,0,0)and )(23,0,0,13))

Short Answer

Expert verified

The value of the game is-1 by reducing dominance. Otherwise, without a reduction solution for this payoff matrix is not possible.

Step by step solution

01

Payoff matrix

The payoff matrix had rows and columns that make a move for winning. Row and columns have a mixed strategy to win the game. By observing the opponent’s moves, strategies are predicted. The average payoff is represented as follows,

i,jGIj.P[Rows,column]=i,jGIjxiyj ......(1)

02

Calculation of the game value

The given payoff matrix is more significant, with eight rows and four columns. The larger matrix is reduced by the dominance of the probability of rows and columns.

Sum the row and column values, and delete the rows and columns with the least values.

00110121111110011203111103210211220042220806

The reduced matrix after deleting the dominance is 1110

The row min max of the matrix 1110is -1, The column max min of the matrix is -1.

rowminmax=columnmaxmin-1=-1

The above value is denoted as, Gij=-1 ......(2)

From the given mixed strategies 13,0,0,12,16,0,0,0and 23,0,0,13,

13+0+0+12+16+0+0+0=123+0+0+13=1

Substitute the values of mixed strategies sums and the value of Equation (2) in Equation (1).

i,jGIj.P[Rows,column]=i,jGIjxiyj(-1)13+0+0+12+16+0+0+0.23+0+0+13=1=i,jGIjxiyj

Solving the above equation,

i,jGIjxiyj=-1

Therefore, the value of the game is -1 by reducing dominance. Otherwise, without a reduction solution, a payoff matrix is not possible.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

There are many common variations of the maximum flow problem. Here are four of them.

(a) There are many sources and many sinks, and we wish to maximize the total flow from all sources to all sinks.

(b) Each vertex also has a capacity on the maximum flow that can enter it.

(c) Each edge has not only a capacity, but also a lower bound on the flow it must carry.

(d) The outgoing flow from each node u is not the same as the incoming flow, but is smaller by a factor of (1-U), whererole="math" localid="1659789093525" u is a loss coefficient associated with node u.

Each of these can be solved efficiently. Show this by reducing (a) and (b) to the original max-flow problem, and reducing (c) and (d) to linear programming.

The pizza business in Little Town is split between two rivals, Tony and Joey. They are each investigating strategies to steal business away from the other. Joey is considering either lowering prices or cutting bigger slices. Tony is looking into starting up a line of gourmet pizzas, or offering outdoor seating, or giving free sodas at lunchtime. The effects of these various strategies are summarized in the following payoff matrix (entries are dozens of pizzas, Joey’s gain and Tony’s loss).




TONY




Gourmet

Seating

Freesoda

JOEY

Lower price

+2

0

-3


BiggerSlices

_1

-2

+1

For instance, if Joey reduces prices and Tony goes with the gourmet option, then Tony will lose 2 dozen pizzas worth of nosiness to Joey.

What is the value of this game, and what are the optimal strategies for Tony and Joey?

Give an example of a linear program in two variables whose feasible region is infinite, but such that there is an optimum solution of bounded cost.

Question: Duckwheat is produced in Kansas and Mexico and consumed in New York and California. Kansas produces 15 shnupells of duckwheat and Mexico 8. Meanwhile, New York consumes 10 shnupells and California 13. The transportation costs per shnupell are \(4 from Mexico to New York, \)1 from Mexico to California, \(2 from Kansas to New York, and \)3 and from Kansas to California. Write a linear program that decides the amounts of duckwheat (in shnupells and fractions of a shnupell) to be transported from each producer to each consumer, so as to minimize the overall transportation cost

Moe is deciding how much Regular Duff beer and how much Duff Strong beer to order each week. Regular Duff costs Moe \(1 per pint and he sells it at \)2 per pint; Duff Strong costs Moe $1.50 per pint and he sells it at per pint. However, as part of a complicated marketing scam, the Duff company will only sell a pint of Duff Strong for each two pints or more of Regular Duff that Moe buys. Furthermore, due to past events that are better left untold, Duff will not sell Moe more than 3,000 pints per week. Moe knows that he can sell however much beer he has. Formulate a linear program for deciding how much Regular Duff and how much Duff Strong to buy, so as to maximize Moe’s profit. Solve the program geometrically.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free