Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Prove that the sample mean is the best linear unbiased estimator of the population mean \(\mu\) as follows. (a) If the real numbers \(a_{1}, a_{2}, \ldots, a_{n}\) satisfy the constraint \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{i}=C\), where \(C\) is a given constant, show that \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{i}^{2}\) is minimised by \(a_{i}=C / n\) for all \(i\). (b) Consider the linear estimator \(\hat{\mu}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{i} x_{i}\). Impose the conditions (i) that it is unbiased, and (ii) that it is as efficient as possible.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sample mean \(\hat{\mu} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n x_i\) is the best linear unbiased estimator of \(\mu\) because it minimizes \(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2\) and satisfies the unbiased condition.

Step by step solution

01

Statement of the Problem

Given real numbers \(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n\) must satisfy the constraint \(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i = C\), we need to show that \(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2\) is minimized when \(a_i = \frac{C}{n}\) for all \(i\).
02

Set Up the Minimization Problem

Use the method of Lagrange multipliers to minimize \(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2\), subject to the constraint \(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i = C\). The Lagrange function is defined as: \[ L(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n, \lambda) = \sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 + \lambda (C - \sum_{i=1}^n a_i) \]
03

Compute Partial Derivatives

Calculate the partial derivatives of the Lagrange function with respect to each \(a_i\) and \(\lambda\): \(\frac{\partial L}{\partial a_i} = 2a_i - \lambda = 0 \)\(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} = C - \sum_{i=1}^n a_i = 0\)
04

Solve the System of Equations

From \( 2a_i = \lambda \), solve for \(a_i\): \( a_i = \frac{\lambda}{2}\)Substitute into the constraint \(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i = C\) to get \( \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\lambda}{2} = C \), which simplifies to \( n \cdot \frac{\lambda}{2} = C\)Solve for \(\lambda\): \(\lambda = \frac{2C}{n}\)Thus, \(a_i = \frac{C}{n}\)
05

Define Linear Estimator

Consider the linear estimator of the population mean, defined as \(\hat{\mu} = \sum_{i=1}^n a_i x_i\). Use the condition that \( \hat{\mu} \) is unbiased and efficient.
06

Impose Unbiased Condition

For \(\hat{\mu}\) to be unbiased, \( \mathbb{E}[\hat{\mu}] = \mu\). We have \( \mathbb{E}[\hat{\mu}] = \mathbb{E}[\sum_{i=1}^n a_i x_i] = \sum_{i=1}^n a_i \mu = \mu \sum_{i=1}^n a_i \)Since the sum must equal \(1\), \(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i = 1\)
07

Optimize Efficiency

To achieve maximum efficiency, minimize the variance of \(\hat{\mu}\). Note \( \text{Var}(\hat{\mu}) = \sigma^2 \sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 \)From part (a), this variance is minimized when \(a_i = \frac{1}{n}\). Thus, \(\hat{\mu} = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{n} x_i = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n x_i\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

sample mean
The sample mean is the arithmetic average of a set of observations. If you collect data points, such as \( x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n \), the sample mean is found by summing all data points and then dividing by the number of data points. Mathematically, it is represented as: \[ \bar{x} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \]
This calculation provides a single value which represents a central point of the data. It is frequently used in statistics to estimate the population mean. This estimator is crucial because, under certain conditions, it performs exceptionally well with respect to bias and efficiency.
population mean
The population mean, denoted \mu, is the average of all values in a population. Unlike the sample mean, which is computed from a subset of the population data, the population mean encompasses every data point within the entire population. For large data sets or when collecting the whole population's data is feasible (which is often impractical), the population mean can be directly computed:
\[ \mu = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N x_i \]
Here, N represents the total number of observations in the population, and \mu provides a true average value for the population. The population mean is a fixed value, in contrast to the sample mean, which may vary depending on the sample taken.
Lagrange multipliers
Lagrange multipliers are a strategy used in optimization to find local maxima and minima of a function subject to equality constraints. In our specific problem, we wish to minimize the sum of squares of \( a_i \) subject to the constraint \( \sum_{i=1}^n a_i = C \). The Lagrange multiplier technique creates a new function called the Lagrangian, which incorporates this constraint:
\[ L(a_1, a_2, \, \ldots, a_n, \lambda) =\ \sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 + \lambda(C - \sum_{i=1}^n a_i)
\]

To find minimizing values, we take partial derivatives with respect to each variable (both \( a_i \) and the Lagrange multiplier \( \lambda \)), set them to zero, and solve the resulting equations.
unbiased estimator
An unbiased estimator is a statistical estimator that, on average, gives the true value of the parameter being estimated. In other words, the expected value of an unbiased estimator equals the parameter it estimates. For our linear estimator \( \hat{\mu} = \sum_{i=1}^n a_i x_i \), it is unbiased if
\[ \mathbb{E}[\hat{\mu}] = \mu \]
\(Here, \mathbb{E}[\hat{\mu}] \) is the expected value of \hat{\mu} and should be equal to the population mean \( \mu \). In the context of our estimator, the condition that ensures it is unbiased is
\[ \sum_{i=1}^n a_i = 1 \]

If an estimator consistently hits the true parameter value, it offers more reliable and accurate inferences.
variance minimization
Variance minimization involves finding an estimator that not only is unbiased but also has the smallest possible variance among all unbiased estimators. For our linear estimator \( \hat{\mu} = \sum_{i=1}^n a_i x_i \), the goal is to minimize \( \text{Var}(\hat{\mu}) \), noting that the variance of a sum of independent variables (with equal variance) is given by:
\[ \text{Var}(\hat{\mu}) = \sigma^2 \sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 \]
Using the result from part (a) of our problem, we know that \(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2\) is minimized when each \( a_i \) equals \( \frac{1}{n} \). Hence, this combination yields the lowest variance for \hat{\mu} while ensuring it is still unbiased.
This leads to the conclusion that
\[ \hat{\mu} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \]
is not only unbiased but also the most efficient (minimum variance) estimator of the population mean.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experiment consists of a large, but unknown, number \(n(\gg 1)\) of trials in each of which the probability of success \(p\) is the same, but also unkown. In the \(i\) th trial, \(i=1,2, \ldots, N\), the total number of successes is \(x_{i}(\gg 1)\). Determine the log-likelihood function. Using Stirling's approximation to \(\ln (n-x)\), show that $$ \frac{d \ln (n-x)}{d n} \approx \frac{1}{2(n-x)}+\ln (n-x) $$ and hence evaluate \(\partial\left({ }^{n} C_{x}\right) / \partial n\) By finding the (coupled) equations determining the ML estimators \(\hat{p}\) and \(\hat{n}\), show that, to order \(N^{-1}\), they must satisfy the simultaneous 'arithmetic' and 'geometric' mean constraints $$ \hat{n} \hat{p}=\frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} x_{i} \quad \text { and } \quad(1-\hat{p})^{N}=\prod_{i=1}^{N}\left(1-\frac{x_{i}}{\hat{n}}\right). $$

The function \(y(x)\) is known to be a quadratic function of \(x\). The following table gives the measured values and uncorrelated standard errors of \(y\) measured at various values of \(x\) (in which there is negligible error): $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} x & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ y(x) & 3.5 \pm 0.5 & 2.0 \pm 0.5 & 3.0 \pm 0.5 & 6.5 \pm 1.0 & 10.5 \pm 1.0 \end{array} $$ Construct the response matrix \(R\) using as basis functions \(1, x, x^{2} .\) Calculate the matrix \(\mathrm{R}^{\mathrm{T}} \mathrm{N}^{-1} \mathrm{R}\) and show that its inverse, the covariance matrix \(\mathrm{V}\), has the form $$ \mathrm{V}=\frac{1}{9184}\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 12592 & -9708 & 1580 \\ -9708 & 8413 & -1461 \\ 1580 & -1461 & 269 \end{array}\right). $$ Use this matrix to find the best values, and their uncertainties, for the coefficients of the quadratic form for \(y(x)\).

On a certain (testing) steeplechase course there are 12 fences to be jumped and any horse that falls is not allowed to continue in the race. In a season of racing a total of 500 horses started the course and the following numbers fell at each fence: \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrrrrrr}\text { Fence: } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 \\ \text { Falls: } & 62 & 75 & 49 & 29 & 33 & 25 & 30 & 17 & 19 & 11 & 15 & 12\end{array}\) Use this data to determine the overall probability of a horse falling at a fence, and test the hypothesis that it is the same for all horses and fences as follows. (a) draw up a table of the expected number of falls at each fence on the basis of the hypothesis; (b) consider for each fence \(i\) the standardised variable $$ z_{i}=\frac{\text { estimated falls }-\text { actual falls }}{\text { standard deviation of estimated falls }} $$ and use it in an appropriate \(\chi^{2}\) test; (c) show that the data indicates that the odds against all fences being equally testing are about 40 to \(1 .\) Identify the fences that are significantly easier or harder than the average.

According to a particular theory, two dimensionless quantities \(X\) and \(Y\) have equal values. Nine measurements of \(X\) gave values of \(22,11,19,19,14,27,8\), 24 and 18 , whilst seven measured values of \(Y\) were \(11,14,17,14,19,16\) and 14. Assuming that the measurements of both quantities are Gaussian distributed with a common variance, are they consistent with the theory? An alternative theory predicts that \(Y^{2}=\pi^{2} X\); is the data consistent with this proposal?

A population contains individuals of \(k\) types in equal proportions. A quantity \(X\) has mean \(\mu_{i}\) amongst individuals of type \(i\), and variance \(\sigma^{2}\) which has the same value for all types. In order to estimate the mean of \(X\) over the whole population, two schemes are considered; each involves a total sample size of \(n k\). In the first the sample is drawn randomly from the whole population, whilst in the second (stratified sampling) \(n\) individuals are randomly selected from each of the \(k\) types. Show that in both cases the estimate has expectation $$ \mu=\frac{1}{k} \sum_{i=1}^{k} \mu_{i} $$ but that the variance of the first scheme exceeds that of the second by an amount $$ \frac{1}{k^{2} n} \sum_{i=1}^{k}\left(\mu_{i}-\mu\right)^{2}. $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Combined Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free