At an international "peace' conference a large number of delegates are seated
around a circular table with each delegation sitting near its allies and
diametrically opposite the delegation most bitterly opposed to it. The
position of a delegate is denoted by \(\theta\), with \(0 \leq \theta \leq 2
\pi\). The fury \(f(\theta)\) felt by the delegate at \(\theta\) is the sum of his
own natural hostility \(h(\theta)\) and the influences on him of each of the
other delegates; a delegate at position \(\phi\) contributes an amount
\(K(\theta-\phi) f(\phi)\). Thus
$$
f(\theta)=h(\theta)+\int_{0}^{2 \pi} K(\theta-\phi) f(\phi) d \phi
$$
Show that if \(K(\varphi)\) takes the form \(K(\varphi)=k_{0}+k_{1} \cos \psi\)
then
$$
f(\theta)=h(\theta)+p+q \cos \theta+r \sin \theta
$$
and evaluate \(p, q\) and \(r\). A positive value for \(k_{1}\) implies that
delegates tend to placate their opponents but upset their allies, whilst
negative values imply that they calm their allies but infuriate their
opponents. A walkout will occur if \(f(\theta)\) exceeds a certain threshold
value for some \(\theta .\) Is this more likely to happen for positive or for
negative values of \(k_{1} ?\)